Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conyers on flag burning: "Once we decide to limit freedom of speech,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:53 PM
Original message
Conyers on flag burning: "Once we decide to limit freedom of speech,
Edited on Wed Jun-22-05 09:54 PM by MelissaB


House approves amendment to protect U.S. flag



..snip

Opponents warn the amendment would alter the Bill of Rights to exclude an expression of free speech. It "elevates a symbol of freedom over freedom itself," Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., said. "Once we decide to limit freedom of speech, limitations on freedom of the press and freedom of religion may not be far behind."

Link: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-06-22-flag-burning_x.htm?POE=NEWISVA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. The gov has been trying to pass that since the 60's. It plan does not
belong in the Constitution. Besides, desecrating a flag is self-penalizing. People who desecrate the flag tend to get beat up.

I remember in the 60's a union working in NYC beat up a hippie that had the flag sewed on his/her jeans. Now I go into stores, and there are slacks with the flag on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm nervous about this one.
Here is another quote from the article:

Those on both sides of the issue say this may be the year. Vote counts by the Citizens Flag Alliance, which supports the amendment, and the American Civil Liberties Union, which opposes it, show the Senate could be only two votes shy of the 67 needed to send the measure to the states for ratification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. I love that man!!!
:loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya:

Everytime I reach a point where I think that I can't possibly love him any more than I do, he does something wonderful or says something wonderful and I end up loving him even more!

:loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Me too!
He's great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
21. How long before hate radio hosts spin this into something
like "Conyers support flag burning"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raiden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Brilliant! What a guy!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. It would be an absolutely unenforcible law.
What if they burn a flag with only 49 stars, or inversed stripes, or a homemade flag that looks like crap. Eventually it is going to come down to either permitting it all or cracking down on any anti-governmental speech.

It can't be enforced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. but it would be a great excuse for arrests at protests
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. They'll be finding burned flags littering the highway
Are they going to ban cross-burning too?

MoPaul had a great idea- burn the CONFEDERATE flag

burn THIS flag chumps!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x3924411

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
22. What if I paint an image of the flag on fire & march around with that?
Edited on Thu Jun-23-05 03:53 AM by Pachamama
Would I be guilty of "flag desecration"? Would even possessing the image of the flag being desecrated be punishable by law? And if so, where does it stop? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merbex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. I am convinced that certain politicians like Conyers, Kennedy,Byrd
reach a certain point in their career when THEY JUST DO THE RIGHT THING

Is it because they are a certain age,have no asperations for higher office and they say WTF I'm here,I might as well do good and live up to my conscience,my belifs and the oath I took

We need more like them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnoopDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. 'limitation on freedom of religion"...?
Would that mean that 'they' would force a religion on me?

That will be the day. If anybody ever mandates that I 'follow' a religion - that will be the day I 'protect' myself...always.

Being agnostic, to have someone force me to believe is the 'invisible man' would be the day I... I.... I guess I would leave America.... Just like our founding fathers.... Escape religious prosecution.

Or, I guess enforce the Constitution of the United States of Americs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. If flag burning Is okay is Bible burning or Torah burning or
Quran burning okay?

Could someone explain the difference to me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Flag burning began as a PATRIOTIC protest -- saying the flag was 'soiled'
... by the acts of a government that ran contrary to the ideals the flag stood for. (A 'soiled' flag must, by law, be disposed of by burning.)

Thus, burning the American flag is a protest against government corruption and treachery. In promulgating this amendment, elected officials are, in effect, consecrating themselves! They're reacting to a protest against corrupt government, not an insult to the nation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. That's true, and that's what sells it to the fundies and neocons.
You think they don't know that further limits on speech are going to come the second we step on the slippery slope?

They are hoping for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. Transient symbols.
Does this apply to all past and future flags of the U.S.? To the confederate flag which was once the flag of parts of the U.S.? To stickers and decals and other symbols of the symbol? Will this apply to the new flag of Jesusland?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. And also
the way to properly get way of a flag is to burn it. It's disrespectful to just throw it away. And what about all the tshirts, bandana's, bears etc? That's also disrespectful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. SYMBOLS over Freedom. Give up your FREEDOM for a SYMBOL.
Only in America can so many be so fucking stupid.

Please don't have to learn the hard way, America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeCajun Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. As if these people would elevate a Cross over Jesus' moral teachings! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. I have yet to talk to anyone in support of banning flag-burning...
Edited on Thu Jun-23-05 02:38 AM by Hobarticus
It's such a non-issue. I bet this will go over badly.

You've got Bush wandering the highways and byways like a crazed hermit, blathering about Social Security being on the verge of collapse...and Congress is worried about tripe like this? How can the GOP shreik about one thing, and do another?

This isn't a priority. People aren't stupid, they can smell grandstanding a mile away. This is the next "Big Brother" act to blow up in their faces.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrlandoGator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Eh, I ran into a few people at work who are 100% in favor of it.
They think this law is about flag burning and not about limiting rights of expression.

By the way, how can you have a constitutional amendment that:

a) Is worded so vagely that it could never possibly be enforced, and
b) Is in diametric conflict with the First Amendment?

People, keep in mind that this is the second proposed amendment byt the Republicans to limit our freedoms. The only other such amendment was the 18th (alcohol prohibition), and it was repealed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. "First Amendment, Schmirst Amendment..."
"Let's bust us some hippies!"

Nonsense. I'm with ya...if it makes the books, it won't last long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. If this one makes it to the Constitution it will never be repealed.
It would be impossible to enforce, and easy as hell to find loopholes around, but it would never get repealed.

To do so would bring a wave of righteous indignation like no one has seen before. And all because people don't understand the meaning or freedom of speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrlandoGator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. It's "unrepealable" just like "under God" in the Pledge.
Edited on Thu Jun-23-05 06:57 AM by OrlandoGator
Anyone who tried to repeal the Amendment would be labeled a "flag burner" and ostracized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC