|
They haven't ben taught any intellectual self-discipline. They may or may not have learned some form of intellectual discipline, economics, psychology, whatever, but no SELF-discipline.
They haven't been taught that the first thing you do with a belief structure is criticise it. All human brains have this habit of producing garbage, but most people don't get to grips with the implication that *their* brain might be producing garbage, they're usually much more concerned with trying to avoid other people they feel alienated from "cutting and pasting" new ideology into their belief structures.
People who actualy sit down and think "Okay, what do I *think* about politics" always end up as liberals because they have learned to criticise their own beliefs, and right wing thinking is just chock full of nursery rhyme thinking, sing-song, meaningless "morality" that doesn't have anything to do with anything outside the author's head, feel-good sound-bitish aphorisms and stuff that's just plain factually wrong, usually thorugh a total lack of interest in reality.
Right wing fuckwits just absorb whatever ideology makes them feel good about themselves and don't even notice that they believe self-contradictory things because they've never been taught that the contradictory things in THEIR heads are as bad as the contradictory things they can see in other people's heads, if they can see them at all. There *are* right wing people who can analyse belief structures but they keep falling into stupid repetetive cyclic self-reinforcing pseudologic because the basic PURPOSE of their analysis isn't about finding the truth, it's about WINNING, they never analyse THEMSELVES, the most important step.
To them, politics is a tribal game, a game of who's winning, it's not about establishing the truth or coming to some kind of consensus. It's about what they look like, not what IS. That's why they love TV so much, it's all fantasy.
If you're going to analyse a problem, the first thing you do is make sure your tools are in good shape, and your brain has to absorb information in an open minded way to get good results. The reason all their arguments fail is because they don't have the Western Scientific Tradition drummed into their heads when they're kids. Truth really isn't a big deal for them. I came to this realisation when I saw someone on TV saying the reason he opposed evolution was that he "didn't like the idea" that he was descended fom an ape, as if reality was a big video game designed to make him feel comfortable about himself rather than something seperate from him that he had to relate to objectively.
You have to exclude sources of bias when you're analysing something. The biggest source of bias is always yourself.
So they just collect beliefs that fit their image of themselves as if it was stamp collecting or a sort of social club and if it comes out hypocritical, who cares? So long as their RW buddies still drink the Kool-Aid with them thy don't *care*.
In some ways they are far more like the primitive mob they subconsciously (or sometimes quite consciously) accuse the left of being than they realise...
|