Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Niger Documents--a murky affair

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 02:53 AM
Original message
Niger Documents--a murky affair
First off, here's a good consolidation of what is out there:

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/wot/iraq/forged_niger_documents.html#1%20%20%20%20%20%20%20How%20the%20documents%20were%20obtained.

The documents were obtained in late 2001 from the Italians. They suggested that Saddam tried to acquire 500 tons of uranium-oxide.

I assume everyone knows how ridiculous and simple the forgeries were. One letter was on the wrong letterhead, references were made to Niger's obsolete 1965 constitution, and signatures of officials, who were in some cases no longer in power, had been poorly forged. The main import of the forged documents is even more ridiculous. All of the output of "yellow-cake" in Niger comes from two French-owned mines in Niger. All of the output is pre-sold to power companies in Spain, France and Japan. 500 tons is a ridiculously large amount that could not shipped out on the sly without anyone noticing. An IAEA official is quoted as saying the forgeries were so bad that his "jaw dropped". Another said inaccuracies were found "after a few hours of going at it with a critical eye".

The IAEA had requested the Documents since September 2002, around the time Colin Powell asserted the evidence in a closed door hearing at the UN. They did not receive them until February 2003.

THe US and the British had this information for many months. It consisted of childishly forged documents. They had to know the documents were false.

So how does this fit in with any discernible political strategy? The documents are turned over to the IAEA just in time for them to be declared fraudulent before the war, yet there is no noise made in the media about their presence in the SOTU address. So why use fraudulent documents in a nationally televised speech and turn them over to the IAEA to be discredited? This shows that Bush had an expectation the false nature of the documents would be ignored in the media. Why did Bush expect to get away with this, and how did he get away with it for so long? It seems he was set up to fight this war and then fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. DU knew before the war too
Wasn't the inaccuracy of the Niger documents a dicussion before the war? So many knew about this and their attempt to connect 9/11 to Iraq and more.
This could be a set up but like Gergen said - these people live in an echo chamber. The hubris of the neo-cons and the administration is what made these people think they would get a pass on their propaganda. The media has worshipped Bush since he stole the election so why would he think anything would change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yeah... but yall are just a TINY, fringe, whacko, internet, echo chamber
:evilgrin:

that should be a regular feature, like the 'top ten idiots', how bout the top ten 'trends'... could have fun with that, no? :shrug:

i just hope these fools don't let another '911' or WORSE happen to save themselves :scared:

i only saw rummy on mtp and he certainly appeared to be STRUGGLING mightly to hold back his TRUE PERSONNA - a short, arrogant, patroning, bully - he was in a literal wrestling match with himself on live teeVee, with all the hand wringing.

these folks are our worst fears come true, strangelovians have got the helm and are forcing confrontations of a nuclear scale and greater with everyone we disagree with.

what a nightmare i hope it is over SOON :bounce:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The good news though
Can you imagine Bush-Condi-Rummy going on TV trying to sell another war? Who would believe them now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC