Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which pundits used the "Everyone knows * lied" defense?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 01:41 PM
Original message
Which pundits used the "Everyone knows * lied" defense?
Besides andrea mitchell? And do we have that on video? I mean I am outraged that they can say this with a straight face, and I have to be honest, I have been sleeping so much better now that DSM seems to be getting improved notice, and I have not followed the media whores so closely in recent weeks. So again, who are the bastards and are we going to conduct a media blast to turn those words back at them?!

How dare they make him out to be some sort of honest,courageous, straight shootin', rootin'-tootin' good guy, when he is really a friggin' idiot, that thinks he is tough by sending our young people to die! I want all of those that said this, are we keeping track of this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. At least you didn't use "journalist'
when referring to Andrea Mitchell.


Keith’s Barbeque Central
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, since she married Greenspan
she's probably in love with her niche in Washington society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. There was some inference in Andrea Mitchell's article,
Edited on Sat Jun-18-05 01:49 PM by BleedingHeartPatriot
It sounded "off", see what you think.
Kind of, we knew we was going to do it, no matter what he said"

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1547518#1547550

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, WE knew
but no one wanted to believe us.

Feeling vindicated yet?

No?

Maybe we'll feel better when the public outcry sends the rats scurrying to their holes. Watch out Rush, O'Lielly, Coulter, and the rest of you. You're at least as responsible as Bush and his cronies.

We know who you are and we'll not forget that you helped "catapult the propaganda."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm in total agreement with you slor!
"How dare they make him out to be some sort of honest,courageous, straight shootin', rootin'-tootin' good guy"

I don't know which ones actually said this, but will start to search for media clips.

And, I'm also thinking that we should all be focusing on bringing the fact that children are being raped at Abu Graib (?sp) to the whole world's attention. THIS CANNOT GO ON! We must demand the gov't investigate this! If there are video tapes, as has been reported, we must demand these!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beowulf Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. A Repub talking point
This is an administration talking point, that it has been U.S. policy to seek the removal of Sadaam since the mid-90's. A nice way of tying Dems and Clinton to current actions.

And that's the difference. We're not talking policy, we are talking about methods used to achieve policy. This is an extremely dishonest way of conflating the two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's it! thanks for clarifying policy vs. method of "removal"
in dealing with these talking points. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC