I'm a DUmmy, and PROUD of it!!!!!

[CatWoman]

I see the latest nickname the unimaginative morans have tried to label us with is DUmmy, or DUmmie.

I'll be their DUmmie, or as Val Kilmer's Doc Holliday said,"I'll be your huckleberry".

[proud patriot]

1. He was so great in that role

"I'll be your huckleberry"

[CatWoman]

2. !

:hi:

[MarianJack]

7. Should Have Gotten the Supporting Actor Oscar For That!

"I've got 2 guns, one for the both of ya'!"

[proud patriot]

39. Most definately , I agree

;-) I'm going to start using it , I think

[MemphisTiger]

3. Who cares what those brainwashed freaks think

I'd rather be a DUmmie than a FReeper

[WillyT]

6. Now, Now... Let's Get Our Freaks Straight Here...

Freak = Good



FREEK = anti-american, anti-christian, freeper scumbags, or... Bad



:hi::evilgrin::hi:

Hey Cat!!!

:bounce:

[King Coal]

4. LOL! Can you imagine Meandog talkin' smack to CatWoman?

I'm laughing so hard I can barely type. LOL!

[mike_c]

5. what I don't understand...

...is the UTTER OBSESSION "they" have with DU. I mean, they follow us like a soap opera, fer cryin' out loud.

[DemonFighterLives]

9. They are starving for ideas

Maybe even they are burning out on repeating the rovian talking points.
Oh the name really hurts freeps! :silly:

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

13. It's what happens when you remove masturbation as an option

their members are too tiny to even pee with so they have to obsess about something else

[mike_c]

22. please don't ever do that again...

...when I have a mouthful of coffee! (cleans monitor) :rofl:

[lala_rawraw]

14. I can bet the response to this, no joke

Watch them say: "because you are a soap opera". Or something equally unoriginal.

I understand their obsession. They are soulless, unethical, and un-American, so their obsession is par for the course.

Of course there is also the fact that, once again, given that they will never take a moment of their time to do anything productive, honest, or that might help someone else, they are left with equivalent of "don't burn our flag or our stem cells" genre. It is a lot more simple and does not require real sacrifice for them to scream about intangible things, but you will never see them making that same effort for something tangible.

Stem Cells = important
Starving Children = nope

Flag burning = moral outrage
Constitution burning = don't care

Support the Troops in war = always
Support them when they are back from war = never

You see, this type of brain death and single thought reality does not give them much else to do other than to either watch soap opera's or label everything a soap opera so they can watch it.

[Sparkly]

42. I think they're constantly looking for excuses

for maintaining their death-grip on rightwing lies. They need scripts (from Rove to Rush to Fox, in that order) to make excuses and come up with rationales. Examples:

"Duh, yeah but the recession started under Clinton!"
"Duh, yeah but tax cuts always increase revenues!"
"Duh, yeah but everybody thought Saddam had WMDs!"
"Duh, yeah but Kerry faked his wounds!"
"Duh, yeah but we've liberated those people!"

The list goes on forever.

I think they hear something in the news (on rare occasions) that sparks a little cognitive dissonance, and they go, "Huh? There must be some excuse for that." (Except they think of it as an "explanation.")

So they wait uncomfortably until Rove/Rush/Fox provides it. Then they parrot it. Then they run here to see how it's playing, feeling "smart."

[Submariner]

8. Thanks FREEPS

We enjoy the attention by the FREEP under-class...or in most cases, the no class.

[stevedeshazer]

35. Uncle Dad!

[lala_rawraw]

10. Hey, any name is better

Than the actual truth of who/what they are. I am not even sure what name is appropriate for people who:

1). Support torture
2). Exploit 9/11 for political reasons (dear idiots, if you are reading this, don't even attempt to faux react to my statement... unlike most of you, I actually do own 9/11.)

3). Support exploitation of faith for political purposes
4). Will fight for a stem cell, but not for a living person
5). Will fight for a stem cell, but not support our troops (dear idiots, again, no faux reaction please because in order to support our troops, you would have to NOT support an administration who, among other things, forces injured troops to pay for their own food while in hospital)

6). Burn the Constitution
7). Believe in a king and lords, not in a Republic/Democracy
8). Racist (Dear idiots, don't throw Janice Brown the "daughter of a sharecropper" crap at us, the woman for reasons only her psychiatrist probably knows opposes the Civil Rights Act)

9). Are so Christian that people like G. Gordon Liddy and Bush represent their moral values (lmao, sorry still laughing here)

10). Are so brain dead that they don't realize that the people in office now are not Republicans, Democrats or anything remotely American.

Obviously, their is a great deal more and much worse. So being called a dummy by faux Americans who watch faux news and are faux Christians is like a badge of honor.

[Cleita]

11. I'm a liberal DUmmy

and proud of it. I had to oneupmanship you CatWoman. ;-)

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

12. There is a poster over there who I am certain is lying about his kid being

hurt in Iraq. I think we should start a site investigating this internet fraud being perpetrated on good trusting conservatives who fall for any patriotic story no matter how big a lie it is.

[lala_rawraw]

16. No, that is not right I think. You cannot know that...

For sure and to say that is not ethical. Sorry:(

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

18. At least as ethical as them challenging Andy

Sorry..if Andy is a liar then so is that person..and they certainly have appeared on all the Andy threads..they deserve our investigation

[lala_rawraw]

21. One has nothing to do with the other

and their unethical brain dump need is not what we are about. I don't like games like this and, you have a parent who may in fact have a child over there and that is nothing to laugh at.

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

23. That parent supports the war...

when they challenge Andy's credibility, they put their own at stake

[Gannon Man Date]

32. "That parent"

is one of the few on that site who stuck up for Andy.

Now who's credibility is at stake?

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

41. Who cares about facts?

Isn't that the point? They made his life into a spectacle. Until that person posts his kid's personal information and let's me call the military to insure that what they said is correct they have no right to the benefit of the doubt.

Oh..and didn't you just blow your cover?

Oh and to all your dirtbag friends and their thread about my post

[lala_rawraw]

34. Again, I don't find a

"this" for "that" approach appropriate when dealing with life or death issues. Parents with children in the war, much like the soldiers, need to hold on to something to justify the loss or possible loss. They cannot simply just say "my child died for nothing." For some, that is far too difficult and they are as much victims as everyone else. Others have been able to say that and come out against the war. Perhaps they are stronger or have better coping skills.

The point is, that is hitting below the belt and not appropriate at all.

[merh]

26. LOL

Thank you for the laugh. :rofl:

[Modem Butterfly]

44. That guy's a pathological liar

Geological consultant turned Special Forces trainer turned injued Somali vet turned former Mexican drug dealer turned gas station owner, dating a woman who is, IIRC, a cross between Beyonce and Halle Berry, drives a Hummer, has a one-eyed war hero daughter named Jazz who, as he put it, has "big fun bubbles". This guy has more unbelievable stories than Usenet.

:eyes:

SA is certainly pathetic and probably pretty sick, too. But he lost my sympathy with Fun Bubbles.

Edited to add:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=105x3178196#3179738

Also, he claims to have had sex with a DUer. Roophies are a hell of a drug.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1393007/posts?page=10#10

[EFerrari]

15. Good one! You made me laugh.

(Dummy or Dummie? Someone should tell them about the invention of the printing press and the formalization of the English language. But, that might be traumatic.)

And the thing I most lub about DU is our sense of humor/humore/humour.

:silly:

[Name removed]

17. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Name removed]

19. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

20. GOOD ONE!

[Sparkle]

30. LOL!

:thumbsup:

[CatWoman]

24. now that I have your attention

FUCK YOU, ASSHOLES

[BigBearJohn]

25. LMFAO in my best TWEEDY imitation: Ha!

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

[Name removed]

27. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[CatWoman]

28. yet they vehemently deny that

bunch of copy catting cretins.

[catmandu57]

29. Well, I like DUmmie

Usually I pay no attention to threads concering these "people", but, I like the ie ending.

[mogster]

31. I am a Crash Test DUmmie

I hurl myself at obstacles of moran nature.

Verbally... :evilgrin:

[NMMNG]

33. Better a DUmmy than a member of Freak Republic

Better to stand for freedom and free thinking than fascism and represson.

Better to stand for love and tolerance than hatred and divisiveness.

Ironic they should call us dummies when they are the ones who can't spell or utilize grammar worth a damn :dunce:

[LittleClarkie]

36. I'm not

I'm reminded of Richard Pryor in Africa. He looked around and said to himself. "Do I see any niggers?" He answered himself, "No." "Why?" "Because there aren't any." And that's when he stopped using the word himself.

I am not a DUmmie.

[lala_rawraw]

37. Holy cow... so someone sent me a link

To a post in the bowls of moral inequity and brain collapse, otherwise known as Cult Uranus, and I went to check it out. Okay, so not that makes to visits there and two visits to Freak parade.

The link there was to this thread here. Now here is what I found really disturbing about those people. They actually talk about particular posters here as though they know them. I kid you not, like some obsessive psychotic un-fan club: stalkers in other words. Really very freaky. I am sure most of you know this, but it seems I just learned this today. I knew they refereed to specific people all the time in some way or another. But the devotion and obsessiveness of it all is really disturbing.

Can anyone actually name a single poster there or know their personality based on tracking their posts?

The other thing that really proves my point about moral bankruptcy is as follows:

Note how at DU in my post above with regard to a parent of a child at war, I defend the parent and the right of that parent (regardless of who they are) to psychologically deal with this mess in any way they need to. I do not judge them and I don't much like when others do judge them.

Yet if you go to the link of this conversation there, you won't see that mentioned. It is completely omitted. Interesting, no? So not only do they hate, but even when someone sticks up for one of them on principle, they cannot see past their own hate.

Unreal. By the way, their comments about a 9/11 survivor (won't list her name here, but someone who I know and respect) are way out of line and prove once again how little these people regard the victims of 9/11. And they have the indecency to call us unpatriotic. I would love to meet one of them at ground zero and have them tell me and other 9/11 survivors, to our faces (not hiding behind a nickname) just how we are "overreacting".

[CatWoman]

38. I know exactly what you mean

It's some freaky shit.

Those people are nuts.

[lala_rawraw]

40. Speed...

DU, this is in response to something on a different board because I have no way of communicating with that poster in particular and some in general, but I need to say some of this. So please do not jump in, I just want to leave these message, not have an argument about it with anyone. Thank you:

Speed:

I did see your post just now, but it was buried in "rounding up people to put in camps" kind of thing so it confused me. This silly cross board posting is just that silly, feel free to IM me at larisastranded if you wish to converse. The below is not for you, but others having a 9/11 trash session.

RANT SESSION (start)

To the "others" who think I simply "lived" in NYC. I don't think you have any ethical right to make assumptions about what happened to me and mine on 9/11. It is, just as the whole parent comment, not appropriate and beneath any real ethical standard. I need not go into my experience in a public forum to satisfy curiosity and that does not mean my experience is somehow, as a result, diminished. When I say "I own 9/11" what I mean is, every person who lived in NYC near ground zero and in general, lost someone on those flights, or lost someone at the Pentagon owns 9/11 to some extent, but it is their tragedy.

The NATION AS A WHOLE FORGOT THE VICTIMS and as a result, cannot claim any sort of ownership of what has become a localized tragedy.. and here is why (just a few gripes from us "un-Americans" and "un-patriotic" victims of 9/11):


1). Victims of 9/11 had to hold vigils begging the US government to convene and investigation. BEGGING, CALLING, sending letters, you name it. Why? How is this ethical to make them have to fight for what should have been a national priority?

2). Osama's family in the country and the Saudi royals were all flown out of the country within days, without being questioned, or detained. Now I did not get this from a movie, really, I actually read (silly me). This is fact!!

3). The victims filed a case against the Saudi family in part for extradition purposes. James Baker steps into to defend NOT the victims but the Saudies... why? What about the victims who cannot afford such a high paid attorney?

4). And my favorite is that instead of brining to justice the bastards who attacked us, their families, and financiers... our President "fixed the facts around the policy" to settle an old debt with someone else who had nothing do to with any of it. Where is the justice?

So please do spare me the display of nationalism and cult like support of a war that has nothing to do with the people who died here, on this soil, in your own country.


Now, they want to build office buildings over a grave site, how about that? Did any of the 9/11 victims get to sit in on this planning of the need to build over graves?

End of Rant

[NMMNG]

43. I know what you mean

I've only seen a few of their threads from links here. I don't know any of their screen names, nor would I be able to place any of the personalities with the names. However one thing struck me as I read post after post...nearly every one was filled with intense vitrol. These people are all mean, hateful, angry people.

Not the sort I would want to associate with.