Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Video) Tony Blair interview on Today Show, asked about Downing St. Memo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:14 AM
Original message
(Video) Tony Blair interview on Today Show, asked about Downing St. Memo
<<SNIP>>
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8141077/



Katie Couric: Before your election, a controversial memo surfaced which showed that seven months prior to the invasion of Iraq, the head of British Foreign Intelligence warned you that President Bush wanted to remove Saddam from military action and the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy. He went on to write, quote, "The case was thin." Given the fact that most of us agree that Saddam Hussein was a bad guy, were you involved in any way, shape or form in beefing up or embellishing intelligence to justify the war?

Blair: Do you know, we've had about four different inquiries into this in the and they've all come to the same conclusion that the intelligence was used in good faith. After that was written, we went to the United Nations, we gave Iraq a last chance to comply with U.N. resolutions. We knew there was a post-September 11th we knew we had to take a different attitude toward WMDs .

Couric: In hindsight, would you have done anything differently?

Blair: Well, I think I would have handled some aspects differently, as I've said, in Britain, I think now in terms of presenting the intelligence, for example. You wouldn't have got into all this stuff about fixing this or fixing that because…

Couric: Or manipulating.

Blair: Yes. Because people … the trouble in politics is that everyone always wants to search for a conspiracy. That is the great search that always goes on. Sometimes it isn't like that, in fact, most of the time it's not like that.

Couric: Are you under a lot of pressure to bring your troops home?

Blair: Well, there are people who say that but I don't think so really. I think the British people aren't quitters and there is a sense and reason, because if Iraq goes right, the whole of the Middle East is a different place. Therefore our own security in America, in Britain, in Europe is improved. If it goes wrong, by contrast, we are all in trouble.

<</SNIP>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Or manipulating"...that sounded like a Freudian slip, to me.
I watched that this morning and I did a double-take when he said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. I have a strong stomach,
but I can't watch Katie. No way. I'd have trouble watching her if she was a judge in the Hague, sentencing Bush and Blair, THAT'S how much I can't stand her. Well, maybe just then, I'd take some tums first, and watch..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I hear you
but sometimes you have to find your inner strength, and watch :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Blair actually confirms the Minutes with this statement...
:After that was written, we went to the United Nations, we gave Iraq a last chance to comply with U.N. resolutions."

They manipulated the intelligence to try and convince the UN to join them in an invasion they had already decided upon rather than going to the UN in hopes of having a solution short of an invasion. The manipulation of the facts was done for a two-fold purpose: To try and get the UN to provide 'cover' for their intentions and to pull the wool over their own citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Wait a minute, if I remember right, Saddam DID cooperate.
He allowed the inspectors back in. They didn't find anything. Bush and Blair said they're there, Saddam is hiding them. Blix said no, they're not there. so then Bush and Blair attacked to prove they were there.

Anyone else remember it that way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. They invaded because that was ALWAYS the plan, well before
the UN even sent the inspectors back in, well before they even went to the UN. Their reason for invading was always regime change NOT WMDs and the 3 memos found, so far, show that very clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundancekid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. thank you! that's EXACTLY the point and the inference to be drawn,
the "manipulation" never stopped, and the deployments were well on their way with funds Congress had appropriated for other purposes -- hell, even Tommy Franks let loose with THAT one ... f*ing lying bastards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Even the fact that they are asking the question is a good sign
It's finally starting to catch fire in the MSM. Keep those emails, phone calls and LTTE's going. They are making a difference. When GE-owned NBC starts asking about, something unusual is definitely happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC