<<SNIP>>
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8141077/Katie Couric: Before your election, a controversial memo surfaced which showed that seven months prior to the invasion of Iraq, the head of British Foreign Intelligence warned you that President Bush wanted to remove Saddam from military action and the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy. He went on to write, quote, "The case was thin." Given the fact that most of us agree that Saddam Hussein was a bad guy, were you involved in any way, shape or form in beefing up or embellishing intelligence to justify the war?
Blair: Do you know, we've had about four different inquiries into this in the
and they've all come to the same conclusion that the intelligence was used in good faith. After that was written, we went to the United Nations, we gave Iraq a last chance to comply with U.N. resolutions. We knew there was a post-September 11th we knew we had to take a different attitude toward WMDs .
Couric: In hindsight, would you have done anything differently?
Blair: Well, I think I would have handled some aspects differently, as I've said, in Britain, I think now in terms of presenting the intelligence, for example. You wouldn't have got into all this stuff about fixing this or fixing that because…
Couric: Or manipulating.
Blair: Yes. Because people … the trouble in politics is that everyone always wants to search for a conspiracy. That is the great search that always goes on. Sometimes it isn't like that, in fact, most of the time it's not like that.
Couric: Are you under a lot of pressure to bring your troops home?
Blair: Well, there are people who say that but I don't think so really. I think the British people aren't quitters and there is a sense and reason, because if Iraq goes right, the whole of the Middle East is a different place. Therefore our own security in America, in Britain, in Europe is improved. If it goes wrong, by contrast, we are all in trouble.
<</SNIP>>