Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jesus died of blood clot: Israeli researcher

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 05:06 AM
Original message
Jesus died of blood clot: Israeli researcher
An Israeli researcher has challenged the popular belief that Jesus died of blood loss on the cross, saying he probably succumbed to a sometimes fatal disorder now associated with long-haul air travel.

Professor Benjamin Brenner wrote in The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis that Jesus's death, traditionally believed to have occurred three to six hours after crucifixion began, was probably caused by a blood clot that reached his lungs.

Such pulmonary embolisms, leading to sudden death, can stem from immobilisation, multiple trauma and dehydration, said Brenner, a researcher at Rambam Medical Centre in Haifa.

"This fits well with Jesus's condition and actually was in all likelihood the major cause of death by crucifixion," he wrote in the article, based on religious and medical texts.

A 1986 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association mentioned the possibility that Jesus suffered a blood clot but concluded that he died of blood loss.

But Brenner said research into blood coagulation had made significant strides over the past two decades.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/Science/Jesus-died-of-blood-clot-Israeli-researcher/2005/06/08/1118123893311.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. More likely He died of shame, knowing...
Edited on Wed Jun-08-05 05:19 AM by rfranklin
what assholes through the ages would do in His name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. lol!
You are so right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think he died of heart failure....

in fact, I'm pretty sure of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. LOL an Israeli scientist tries to describe how Jesus DIED
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. Ding, dong the myth is dead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well, first off, I think that they should concentrate on
Finding out if Jesus actually lived or not. Outside of the Bible, there are no known references to Christ actually having walked the Earth. No Roman records, no independent confirmation of Christ is available. We simply have to take the word of a book that if rife with internal contradictions.

Secondly, they might want to do some shoring up of the story that Christ actually died on the cross. There has been a growing controversy about this for the past twenty years.

Third, it is impossible to determine at this late date what Christ tied of. Body is long gone, no autopsy was performed.

This is just an exercise in mental gymnastics, worthless and useless, but rather ironic in sorry sort of way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. I don't know about this blood clot theory
but it is very unlikely that Jesus died on the cross after just 6 hours. More likely, Jesus was not dead when he was taken down from the cross but when he recovered 3 days later, the idea that he had risen from the dead made for such a great myth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Flaming Red Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. Isn't that what the police usually claim as cause of death
after they beat or suffocate someone and they're found dead in their cells hours later. The suspect died of natural causes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC