Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deliberate Deception—Bush & Iraq: How Much More Evidence is Needed?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 10:14 PM
Original message
Deliberate Deception—Bush & Iraq: How Much More Evidence is Needed?
http://www.opednews.com/dalton_052505_more_evidence.htm


By: Jack Dalton


That the single most serious decision which anyone calling them self the president can make is the decision to go to war, is beyond question. That George W. Bush & Company were formulating plans to invade Iraq even prior to 9/11 is also beyond question; at least for those willing to spend the time looking at the wide body of available evidence.



Paul O’Neill, who was Secretary of the Treasury until Bush replaced him, was very clear when he stated that invading Iraq was on the table from the first day Bush took office. Richard Clarke who was the “Terrorism Czar” was also replaced by Bush. Writing in his book, “Against All Enemies” he is very clear in explaining how the only thing Bush wanted to discuss, or hear, was invading Iraq.



The recent articles by Juan Cole, “The Lie That Led to War” and Robert Parry’s article, “For Bush, Iraq Lies are Fundamental” detailing the trail of BushCo deceptions that ultimate led to this war of choice and the slaughter of over 100,000 Iraqi’s with untold wounded in mind and body; as well as over 1800 Americans dead and up to 85,000 seeking medical care—these are numbers far in excess of what the Pentagon is reporting.



None of this is new information. What is new are the memos recently released which give additional confirmation to the simple fact, Bush & Co wanted to invade Iraq and nothing was going to stop them.

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great op-ed!
It has been bookmarked. And what is more disgusting is that Clinton was the victim of a political witch hunt and the only thing they could pin on him was that he lied about a consentual, private affair with another adult. Now, this op-ed lays down very effectively all the evidence of Bush's lying but we nothing about impeachment. I don't if I am angrier at the general public for accepting his lies or for the Dems for not attacking him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. When the evidence is overwhelming,...
,...yet the criminals are still on the loose,...the system is clearly broken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-05 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-05 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. and when do the Democrats stand up and say . . .
"Hey! You lied to us! You KNEW there were no WMDs, and you assured us there were! You had this war planned months for years! You duped us, and we allowed ourselves to be duped!

"But no more! We can no longer support an illegal war that was started and continued based on fabricated evidence. And we demand a full investigation to uncover the true facts about why we went to war -- and the lies that took us there."

the Democrats should do what's RIGHT instead of what's expedient, i.e. continually enabling BushCo because -- well, I don't know why the hell they do it! . . . but I DO know that public opinion is turning against the war and will continue to do so . . . and by becoming the anti-war party, the Democrats for once could get AHEAD of public opinion and become opinion LEADERS . . . something they haven't been for a very long time . . .

but . . . to paraphrase the scarecrow . . . "If we only had a brain" . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindoctor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-05 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Its not the brain thats missing
Its the balls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC