Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's refer to red states as Bush states.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:26 PM
Original message
Let's refer to red states as Bush states.
That's all they are. 'Red states' too often is used to connote 'family values' and 'morality' while 'Blue states' means 'urban decay.' At least, that's the prevailing political wisdom that Republicans would love to keep around. But really, there are plenty of Democrats in Bush states, and plenty of Republicans in Kerry states. Our job is to convince people of every state that the Democratic party stands for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Or we could just stop repeating the GOP's propaganda for them.
Of course, that wouldn't be anywhere near as much fun as sitting around patting ourselves on the back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Exactly, Why not stop reinforcing Bush's Mandate myth?
Wouldn't that be more productive for the Democratic party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Yeah, being productive is not a priority around here anymore.
I'm not sure what we're all about at DU anymore, but it's definitely not practical political action anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why not "idiot" states? You need to be an idiot to vote for Bush, no?
Unless you are a corporate CEO, that is.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Did you read my post?
I live in one of your "idiot states", does that make me an idiot? If I want to get my neighbor to vote Democratic, should I tell her she lives in an "idiot state?" You have entirely misses the point of my post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. No, but you should explain to them why you would describe their
behavior (voting for bush) as "idiotic"....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. We do need to start taking morality seriously.
Unfortunately, that is another problem. The Democratic party is not pro-people enough. But it is certainly better than the GOP, and that's why we need to shed this image that we only stand for the folks in Kerry states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Social security, health care, anti-war, head-start are not "pro-people"?
Edited on Tue May-24-05 01:57 PM by oasis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. It is, and it is a good start.
A lot of people would argue that other things like the bankrupcy bill are not pro-people. I did not mean it as a blanket statement, just that we have room for improvement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. With Halliburton and the Carlyle Group pushing U.S. foreign policy it's
hard to know the truth about "the issues of the world".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Being anti-War in relation to Iraq
Not absolute pacifism, but recognizing that the Iraq War was based on lies and we have lost well over 1600 US military and upwards of 100,000 Iraqi CIVILIANS in the last 2+ years of war. How do you feel about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. Anti-Iraq invasion does not = absolute pacifism
Absolute faith in any government means you turn a blind eye to the issues of the world with that thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Did you realize this is the Democratic Underground website?
bye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
30. Arthur C Clark on morality:
"The greatest tragedy in mankind's entire history may be the hijacking of morality by religion."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Talking "morality" and "patriotism" is what Rethugs do best. Dems will
never win that public relations battle. It all comes down to framing the argument.

It's up to individual citizens to take the time to get informed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Not being fiscally conservative is all you're pissed at bush for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. The DEM *party* doesn't stand for me in my state.....
....had two Senators here who voted almost straight down the line for the RIGHT...Mary Landrieu and John Breaux two DINO's from HELL...don't even try to convince me otherwise...the proof is there...and that lame ass attempt to stand with her party last night on Nightline...*retch* :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. I ain't giving Bush anything. They lied, cheated and STOLE to get votes.
Edited on Tue May-24-05 01:39 PM by blm
Their fascist cronies bought up most of the media and most of the voting machines to enable BushInc's powergrab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
holboz Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. Most states are purple, aren't they? Let's work with that
Edited on Tue May-24-05 01:58 PM by holboz
I remember those maps that came out after the election that showed most states were "purple states" and neither red or blue. Maybe we need to start talking in shades of purple instead of outright red and blue. Lilac to Violet. I don't know.... it might be a good way to frame Dems for 2006 and 2008. After all, most Americans are in the center of the political spectrum, most are fed up with the current state of things, and those are the people DNC needs to reach out to.

Then again, it's all futile if Dems keep rolling over and bending over in the face of Rethugs' threats. I think there needs to be a New Democratic Party comprised of spirited folks like those of us here at DU who are hoppin' mad with the way things are going on both sides of the isle and are desparate for action and change.

(Just my two cents worth)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rniel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. While we're at it
The Republican party should from now on be only referred to as "The Natural Born Killers" Has a good ring to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. People must die in order for war profiteers to get rich. It's God's will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. BTK Party: Bomb, Torture, Kill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
22. Huh? Calling them Bush states conveys the sense that Democrats stand for
them, while calling them Red States does not?

Sounds like you're digging yourself into a deeper hole by conceding that those states belong to Bush.

Why not just stop playing into the Republicans desire for polarization and extremes by not acting like there's a divide with clearly drawn lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Well, holboz had a better idea (purple states) a few posts up.
Anyway, I'm disappointed that people here want to call them the slave states, or the idiot states. I'm not asking for polarization.

You are right in that 'Bush states' is not the best idea, but it carries less connotation than 'red' and 'blue' do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I'd rather be called a Red state than a Bush state
Bush is the far extreme right of the Republican party ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. Why give him *ownership*?
No state was totally republican; there were lots of blue and purple counties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
29. Let's not.
Don't buy into the false "Red State" versus "Blue State" dichotomy. I live in TEXAS--& my US rep is Sheila Jackson Lee. My state senator & rep are also Dems. (Too bad about the US Senators.)

Here are some alternate views:

www.princeton.edu/~rvdb/JAVA/election2004/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC