Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why I consider this a victory

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
returnable Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 12:23 PM
Original message
Why I consider this a victory
Edited on Tue May-24-05 12:28 PM by returnable
It's really quite simple:

The minority party forced the ruling majority into making a compromise THAT THEY DIDN'T HAVE TO MAKE.

Frist had the votes to kill the filibuster, but his party backed down. They held all the cards and could've jammed through all of these nominees while telling the Dems to just shove it. But they flinched and now their base is going haywire.

You may not like the terms, but I'll take a one-run victory over a blowout loss every time.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. exactly!
:applause: :applause: :applause:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, We May Never Know Who Had The Votes
Edited on Tue May-24-05 12:26 PM by Beetwasher
I'm taking a wait and see. NYT is declaring this a BUSH victory though. I say fuck the NYT, but there it is.

A Modest Victory for Bush, but More Tests Lie Ahead
By RICHARD W. STEVENSON
Published: May 24, 2005


WASHINGTON, May 23 - President Bush won enough from the bipartisan compromise on judicial nominees on Monday night to claim a limited victory, but he now faces a series of additional tests of his political authority, with the stakes extending to the fate of his second-term agenda.

On the plus side for Mr. Bush, the bipartisan agreement among 14 centrist senators expressly called for up-or-down votes on three of his nominees to federal appeals court seats, all but ensuring their confirmations, though it left in limbo the fate of two more.

By explicitly exempting from the agreement two additional judges opposed by Democrats, it did not meet Mr. Bush's oft-stated demand that all his nominees get a vote, and it did not foreclose the possibility that Democrats could block an eventual nominee to the Supreme Court, a matter of intense concern to the White House. The split-the-baby outcome, moreover, did little to resolve a rolling series of challenges to Mr. Bush that in coming days and weeks could do much to set the tone for his second four years in office.

On Tuesday, the House is to vote on a bill that would defy Mr. Bush and lift restrictions on federal financing of stem-cell research, legislation that stands a good chance of passing.

--snip--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Guess What
Frist still has the votes to kill the filibuster, all that this deal really does is give Bush his judges, and denies the American public
the chance to see that the Republican party truly desires a one party
government.

And not all of the Repub base is going haywire, Dobson considers the
Repubs who were part of this deal as traitors and backstabbers, while he still supports Frist. He will now use his considerable power and access to funds to get those
7 Repubs out of office.

We didn't win, all this deal did was to postpone the inevitable, in other words it was a tie!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC