Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

As Deals\Treaties Go Historically, How Do You Rate The Filibuster Deal ???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:54 PM
Original message
As Deals\Treaties Go Historically, How Do You Rate The Filibuster Deal ???
A post I saw in another thread compared it to Neville Chamberlain, and "Peace In Our Time."

Made my heart drop.

Anybody have a different comparison?

:shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PowerToThePeople Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Et tu Brute!
Edited on Mon May-23-05 10:57 PM by PowerToThePeople
We playing nice guy, no big fight. We will get royaly fubar'd again..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unless There Is Something They're Not Telling Us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Growing weary of the wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Mark of a Good Compromise
is that everyone feels slightly dissatisfied. The Pig freepers are cryin' in their beer.

Feels like the system worked to me. Best we could have hoped for. Frist has egg on his face, and the filibuster lives on, for the big fight ahead on Supreme Court nominees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Sorry. Disagree. Rove/Bush/Frist won-out in the long of it.
And we have 3 + more years of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
makhno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. This isn't time for compromise
The Republic is fucked when you have people like Owen getting serious consideration from both parties for a lifetime judgeship. Things must be brought to a head now, while dissent - by citizens or political representatives - is still permitted.

And the pig freepers .. I wouldn't trust their political acumen more than I trust their intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Understand, but . . . 2-3 Supreme Court Justices to Come
This was about the Court, the Supreme Court. The centrist Pub's and Dem's proved THEY can filibuster a deal too. Since I don't particularly want to see Ken Starr or Ted Olson on the Court, I feel like damage control is better right now than ideological purity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. so basically you think
that ceding all current and future judicial nominations below the SC level is a good deal, based on the hope that the fascist cabal will keep their Word Of Honor and not nuke the fillibuster when the SC shithead nomination comes up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. You Overstate
I didn't say we should cede all the appellate courts below the Supreme Court. I have to practice in front of those assholes! I just think sometimes ya gotta give to get. The fifth circuit will get a fascist judge from Texas. The Ninth Circuit will get Janice Rogers Brown, who is pretty conservative but at least reads the briefs.

Unlike Clarence Thomas, who stares out the window during oral argument.

I believe in the system, 'mon. We can't give it away to the Pugs. If we ever do, it's British Columbia time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
makhno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It's not so much ideological purity, IMHO
But rather a demonstration, maybe futile, maybe not, that the Republican party has gone too far with its radical agenda by attempting to short-circuit existing constitutional protections. If nothing else, it would have cost the Republican leadership significant political capital to get the required number of votes on the filibuster issue. As an astute poster pointed out elsewhere tonight, if Frist had the votes, we wouldn't be talking about compromise tonight. Thus, a Democrat-driven compromise was unnecessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. My opinion of the deal goes up if there's more to deal than publicized
If, for instance, dems got those moderate republicans to agree to vote against Brown, at least, then we'd have something.

I have to say, dems shutting down congress because the pugs wanted to change the rules could have been viewed as an admirable position. After all, pug representatives wanted to change ethics rules for DeLay and this was generally unpopular. Further, public polls indicate that getting rid of the fillibuster was not favored. And everybody loves the underdog...

So I think the dem position was stronger than we think, and hopefully they extracted something more worthwhile out of the deal than "We'll not fillibuster this time if you let us keep the fillibuster a while longer and we probably won't use it anyway." At least one of the radical nominees has to go down, then we can say that the dems did their job and opposed unreasonable, unqualified candidates.

Brown is such a bad candidate, like Bolton, that most republicans must be embarrassed to have to defend the adminsitration's pick. So maybe it wouldn't have been so hard to convince 5 or 6 to vote nay. My prediction: Owens gets through, barely, and Brown doesn't make it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Louisiana purchase.
Edited on Mon May-23-05 11:20 PM by FrenchieCat
The Dems are the French in this one ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. Ever heard of the "Bladensburg Races"?
In the War of 1812, the British Army was marching towards Washington. The Maryland militia came out to stop them at Bladensburg. Both sides lined up. The British artillery opened up with a few rounds and the militia turned and started running almost without firing a shot. The Redcoats chased them all the way to Washington and burned the city.

The Democrats were the militia in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC