Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Victory is in the eye of the beholder...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:45 PM
Original message
Victory is in the eye of the beholder...
My .02 cents

My initial thought was that if the Republicans offered a compromise, they did not have the votes. They were running a bluff. In that event, the Democrats should have stuck by their guns. However, that is only true if Frist was in on the negotiation. If this compromise was forged in spite of Frist's efforts, I would call it a Democratic victory of sorts. But, in the sense of who pulled the most chips off the table when the game was over, the Republicans won. They got judges they never should have gotten. That's called a bird in the hand. We got a promise of sorts to allow filibusters under "extraordinary" circumstances - that's called a bird in the bush.

However, since victory is in the eye of the beholder, I think it would behoove us to call this a "victory". Perception is reality. If the Repubs think they lost, for Gods sake, let's not dissuade them. :) Yes, we won! The American people won. The right-wing agenda lost! It's a good day for America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. You're right, kentuck. They got something real, we got air.
:woohoo:

Can't live without air!




:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. That's Crackin Me Up, LOL !!!
:woohoo::woohoo::woohoo:
:woohoo::woohoo::woohoo:
:woohoo::woohoo::woohoo:

:rofl:

And I agree Kentuck!

If perception is reality...

WE WON BIG-TIME !!!

:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. You got that right brother. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Brownshirts are Crying on Free Republic
One really has to wonder what kind of Amerika those pricks want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Teeeeeeehhhhhhheeeee heee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyepaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. You know what,
I think that is probably the best thing I've heard tonight. I am gonna blast my (few) right-wing friends with BS about how the Dems won big. That tactic works great for the pukes--they start with arguments MUCH weaker than calling this deal a Dem win and stick with it NO MATTER WHAT.

It's time we do the same.

In your face Frist!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Frame it as a "victory for America"...
That will really get their goat. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Somebody wise said..
"time would tell on just who was the big winner today".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. We just saw the revolt of the moderat repugs, Frist might have
been told to agree with this, he refused based on what he said in his statement on the floor tonight. The mod repugs , with Warner working with Byrd behind the scenes, revolted and Frist was left chopped at the knees. His political aspirations are toast. He lost big time, the extremist righties are out of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. So Frist said he did not agree with the compromise??
That's interesting. However, I don't think this harms his political aspirations. The right-wing still chooses who will be the Repub candidate. He will still be their darling - perhaps even moreso, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Frist lost control of his team. Repugs are agreeing with the dems.
Edited on Mon May-23-05 11:14 PM by caligirl
Frist won't get a SC nom thru, or Scalias or Thomas appointed to the CJ spot without exposing the real motive of this fight. Since 80% of the American people supported keeping the filibuster, and Frist and Bush wanted to end it just to stick an extremist judge on the SC or get their bought and paid for judge in the CJ spot. 80% of America is going to exact a price for this sooner or later. The consent of the governed is the only way a gov't can govern in a democracy. Or does Frist and Bushco want to tell 80% of America they no longer are governed but rather dictated too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Effect on 2006
Frist may well have been dealt a deathblow in his presidential fantasy. This is a good thing.

On the other hand, are Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi (God bless 'em) merely "curators", or are they revolutionaries who can see us to a new majority in the House? (Taken from an article I just read in Atlantic.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. I couldn't agree more. It was a bad deal - UNLESS
Edited on Mon May-23-05 11:08 PM by johnaries
Frist really had the votes. In any event, as others have said if the far right Repukes think they lost I see no reason to disagree with them. If they have taught us anything, it's that if you say something enugh times the sheeple will believe it - no matter how crazy it is! Plus, we're already starting to see the implosion of the GOP with the cons v neo-cons. Hopefully, this will help that implosion happen a little quicker!

edit to add - recommended. Let's get one more recommendation - I think this belongs on the Greatest Page!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kainah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. OTOH
Just last week, Reid offered an up or down vote on 4 of the nominees. They got three and while they are three terrible judges, 3 still beats 4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. It was a compromise, we retain the right to filibuster
within reason. We give up and allow three judges, but we have opportunities still open when a vacancy comes up on the US Supreme Court and this could be very soon. We may also find we have moderate Republicans more willing to work with us and against President Bush.

IMO, we won and I agree that we should allow people to perceive it in this way. I was not at all sure if it came down to a vote that we would have won. I think that was why Harry Reid was taking our message to the public explaining our position. It may also not have been well received with the public if we had a senate slow-down caused by dems. The repubs could have used this against us big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. The Wingnuts Were Balls To The Walls
Very true, perception is so important here...and maintaining that ability to shut down their nominee for the Supreme Court is a victory.

Frist/Dobson were sure they had the votes going into this morning...or so that's what he was saying to his coven. They expected a full showdown and Reid dispatched ala Daschele. They figured the power of the dollars (Frist/McConnell control the campaign dollars and/or can help fund a primary challenger) would crack the whip.

The fact there's any deal is a victory for the Democrats as the story had been framed in the corporate media that it was the Democrats who were "obstucting" this process. Now that there's a deal, that dog won't hunt anymore. And any change by Frist...or non-acceptance, destroys any credibility with moderates and independents.

Yep...I'm spoiling to tear these bastards apart as much as anyone here, but let's let them think they've lost and over-reach again...and you know they will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. "A bird in the Bush."
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. LOL ..Well Said
:D :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
19. James Dobson is going to punish the Republican seven
by heavily funding a theocrat to run against them in the primaries. You can put money on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC