Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is filibuster saved for good or can they get rid of it later?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:32 PM
Original message
Is filibuster saved for good or can they get rid of it later?
With a Supreme Court nominee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. next Congress
it's gone for this one. In the meantime they should reinforce the rules to end debate, and make it impossible for the President of the Senate to change them unilaterally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't know. The Senate is an on-going body.
The Congress changes every two year with everybody newly elected or reelected. The Senate is 1/3 change every two years -- so it's considering on-going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. it's still divided into two-year Congresses
each with two sessions. It's my understanding that the nuke ban extends through the end of this Congress.

http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/one_item_and_teasers/Years_to_Congress.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. they can get rid of it in the next fabricated 'crisis'
let's lose any pretense that this was a 'victory.' we've been living under a coup d'etat and the cruel overlords are just worried about waking up the masses. irrevocably changing one branch into a rubber stamp would've definitely woke up americans, or at least put such a vice on them that this nation would buckle beyond recovery.

whatever, just trying to avoid the inevitable without actually putting up a fight. wake me when americans actually care about ridding us of our despots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Frist said in his speech he would be watching closely and could
bring it back if he doesn't like how things are going. However since the mod repugs and dems just sliced him off at the knees, and Cheney and bush and their neo con fascist Fristian extremism he doesn't have the clout anymore. his sadness you may have seen as he spoke was the deflating political career of a serial neo con Fristian abuser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. He can bring it back all he wants
if Warner & Co. don't support him he's out of luck.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Right. Frist was just given his looser tag. His way is out, the centrists
are taking back their party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. They only need to turn one of the signatories
and they have 50 + Chenney. And remember, the bar has been lowered. Nominating any of the Terrible Three (or their fellow travelers) would not be an exceptional circumstance.

All we have gained is a respite that will not last out this Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
makhno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Very good point - the bar's been lowered
The Dems gave three extremely conservative judges a lifetime appointment. These are representatives of the hardest line in pro-corporate, anti-citizen legal thought. The Dems will simply not be able to invoke the "exceptional circumstances" for any raving lunatic right-wing appointment anymore, as the precedent for what's common (the opposite of exceptional) has been set tonight. The leftist equivalent of these judges would be Noam Chomsky with a JD.

It's a long-term defeat. One might argue the short-term public perception points gathered by either party, but the Democrats really dropped the ball on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I don't think mod repugs would have gone this far if they planned to
Edited on Mon May-23-05 10:58 PM by caligirl
let these judges thru. I doubt they get the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
makhno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I don't think any Republican senator
has it in him/her to vote down an appointee that is so important to their party and president. Remember, those people do not have a political agenda based on what we, regular folk, call "values", moderate, radical or other. They have an individual agenda framed by the need to secure financial support from the corporate interests that are bankrolling every single campaign in this country, while balancing this out with the moral stance of their core electorate, which unfortunately happens to be largely conservative.

If the "moderates'" puppet masters will like these judges - and there's no reason for them not to - expect an up vote, with maybe a couple of Republican dissenters for show and a Democrat or two voting in support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. We saved it if we get out there, show people the memo and let it
Edited on Mon May-23-05 11:03 PM by BullGooseLoony
be known that our right to filibuster is fully retained. It is at OUR discretion, not theirs.

The problem is they're spinning it. We have to get in front of that and let people know what they agreed to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. That appears to be the beauty of this deal .... Fristfuck is dead in the
water. Not going to take it away now...that is merely an idle threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC