Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stripped Down, Basic, Quick Poll On GD Sentiment About "The Deal"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:19 PM
Original message
Poll question: Stripped Down, Basic, Quick Poll On GD Sentiment About "The Deal"
Do you approve or do you not approve?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nankerphelge Donating Member (995 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. they caved
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. But most DUers think the Dems won, though...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. GD Thinks We Lost But GDP Thinks We Won! Interesting!
Edited on Mon May-23-05 08:26 PM by DistressedAmerican
and counting of course!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
41. And the Lounge sits on the fence and has another beer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. 12 votes is "most"? I always thought there were more people here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. well, for now at least... usually these trends tend to keep up... nt
Edited on Mon May-23-05 08:28 PM by arcos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I've noticed that as well. Unless passionate lobbying turns the tide!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Now it seems to be getting closer!
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. We will rubber stamp Owens & Brown
..in return for the rethugs "word" that they will not nuke us in the future....BULLSHIT!!!

The rethugs have already shown that they cannot be trusted, I'd put up our retirement $$ to say that they will nuke us when it comes time for Supreme Court nominations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. The Moderate GOPers Just Flexed Their Muscles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. That's the only ray of sunshine -- kinda
These Senators created something of a counterweight to the radical rightwing, and that's good. Maybe they can get enough attention AND traction to drag the Senate back into some semblance of sanity. In any case, it'll be interesting to watch what, if anything, they do from here.

Otherwise, tho, I have a heavy heart. Seems like we're never, ever, EVER "winning" anything fully and completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. We need to let them know
they did the right thing! Whether it be a Democrat or a moderate Republican doing it, a bitch-slap to the religious right is always a good thing! Now, if we could get them to vote "No" on those 3 judges....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. What is "Moderate" About Owens and Brown?????
Edited on Mon May-23-05 08:54 PM by AndyTiedye
I'll believe there is such a thing as a moderate Republican in DC
when I see them voting against these Neanderthols.

Now if they get their "up and down vote" and get VOTED DOWN,
that would Change Everything!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. I wish they would have not let up on them, the Repubs are destoring our
nation and right to it

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gothmog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Compromise means noone is happy
This is a good compromise in that noone is happy. We gave up something but we got a great deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
35. Yes, but they're unhappier than we are. So, in fact, we won. Right?
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
48pan Donating Member (957 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm Disappointed
The Republicans would have been shown for the fascists they are. Too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NWHarkness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is a victory for us
Think of the big picture, people. We have to swallow a couple more right wing judges, and in return, we drive a tremendous wedge right through the heart of the GOP coalition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. What if they end up on Scotus? That was the point after all!
If we have lost on the Scotus point we are finished. THAT is the big picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. They won't end up on the Supreme court.
Not in Bush's term anyways.

Republicans already shot themselves in the foot with social security, and now this. The good thing is that they can still shoot themselves in the foot with this again later down the road.

How many federal judges are there? I don't think three will make much difference in the scheme of things. We can counteract conservative judges in a couple of years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. 3 of 8 instead of 6 of 8 - who caved?
Okay, so they gave 'em 3 of 8 - seems like pukes lost!

"Negotiators are hoping to craft a deal that would allow some nominees to be confirmed while leaving others behind. One plan would allow final votes on Owen, California Supreme Court Justice Janice Rogers Brown and former Alabama Attorney General William H. Pryor, as well as Michigan nominees Susan Neilson, Richard Griffin and David McKeague. The nominations of William G. Myers and Henry Saad would remain stuck."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050520/ap_on_go_co/filibuster_fight

Part of Deal
Owen
Brown
Pryor

Not part of deal
Neilson
Griffin
McKeague
Myers
Saad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. There may be more info slipped out in the next day or two.
For now, the impact on Frist's political future -- and maybe McCain's -- and certainly ours -- is significant.

I voted 'approve,' conditionally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'd approve except for the fact that you can't trust those bastards.
Sure they seem pissed but anyone who accepts the Republicans word on anything is bound to be disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. How is this a compromise?
Edited on Mon May-23-05 09:10 PM by aint_no_life_nowhere
Tomorrow, if the "extreme circumstances" option is raised, Frist can always rally his minions for another go at the nuclear option. The only reason that the Republicans cut this deal was to make their party look like moderates. They were falling out of favor with the American public for trying to bully through their program. The majority of Americans are getting scared of the idea of a one-party system. This is going to be spun as a desire of Republicans to compromise and moderate their extremism, without moderating or compromising anything. The Republicans haven't given up anything and Owens, Brown, Pryor and Bolton are going to get rammed down our throats.

This is like Hitler taking Czechoslovakia, telling Chamberlain he would stop his plans for total dominion after this one single "...compromise...".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. The Same Kind Of Language That Let Us Claim We Had UN Approval
for Iraq. While The rest of the world could claim that they never authorized a thing. Hey! Everyone can agree to that!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. They would shoot themselves in the foot trying to pull it again.
The war in Iraq is going against them.
The economy is against them.
Social Security is against them.
The sane ones probably don't want to get painted as liars on top of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. It doesn't make the Republicans look any more moderate
than the Democrats. Remember, this was a BIPARTISAN compromise, not necessarily a bad thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
23. nay (hey, I was the 100th!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
24. There is no deal.
The filibuster remains.
It remains the prerogative of the individual senator.
Any questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
26. Hey, they all get to keep their benefits and paychecks
They all won...as for us, we'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Truest Thing I Have read All Night!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peachhead22 Donating Member (798 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
29. I'm presently on the fence...
...I need to hear more of the details. Not really the reported details, but the deeper, perhaps unwritten details.

-Dobson is pissed. That's a very good indicator.

-Frist's Presidential ambitions just got waay more complicated. A good thing.

-Lindsey Graham is indicating one of the three judges won't pass an up or down vote. A really good thing. Plus it'll piss off Rove and Shrub and further piss off Frist and Dobson.

-If we pushed it and lost we'd have been royally screwed. The current nominees would look like moderates compaired to the clowns Bush could have shuffled through.

-The reported language sounds alot like "you can keep the filibuster only if you don't use it". Not good. "Extraordinary circumstances" could mean a million things or it could mean 'under no circumstances'. I'm hoping to hear more detail in the coming days.

-Shrub himself is gonna probably try to screw up the deal soon by nominating someone really off the wall. He'll try to get a rise out of the Dems. It'll be illuminating to see how the 'Pubs in Congress react.

-That the nuclear option wasn't totally and permanently taken off the table is by far the worst part of it IMO. I suppose it's unrealistic to hope that nixing the nuke option was kinda one of those unwritten things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
30. I'd probably have to go with "disapprove"
As a compromise, I think this one wasn't horrible. My problem is part of me thinks this was an issue we shouldn't have compromised on in the first place. Like Social Security. I guess I would rather have seen the Democrats stand on principle and lose than compromise in this situation, because I felt like what happened amounted to the Repugs trying to do something totally unprecedented and extreme and the Dems offerring them a number of concessions to calm them down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
31. Anything that makes...
...religious wacko cry defeat is worth it.

See this thread for more details: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x3714881
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
32. Didn't someone once announce to the world he was a uniter?
Who was that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
33. Fence-sitting for the moment,
although I think the "deal" is better than the alternative "nuclear option." I like that more moderate Republicans were able to take Frist down a notch or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
36. Fence sitting - I don't think it was a good deal, but I'll wait and
see what the spin works out. Since the worst 3 are getting the nod, I'm assuming the Dems thought Frist had the votes - so maybe it is a good deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chlamor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
37. Get On The Offensive!
Heading in the Wrong Direction- The Deal Sucks but too many are satisfied with crumbs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyepaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
38. The F'ing cowardly rat bastard shits of Democrats caved one more goddamn
time.

I however will behave as if I think we won. It is now time to go on "Operation Confuse." Plus if we say it enough people might start believing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nittygritty Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
39. This compromise
is just a temporary straw dam to hold back the flood of Bush nominations pressing against it: all the repugs have to do is give it a swift kick.

It would have been better in the long run for the Dems to not compromise, thus expediting a blatant example for the masses of the encroaching fascist takeover and lack of respect for the Constitution. All the Dems had to do was shut down Congress for an instant media blitz.

Now all they've done is slow the bleeding for a minute...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
6000eliot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
40. Because we were facing such popular opposition on such a hugely
popular decision. I think the centrist Dems let the Repukes off the hook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
42. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Califooyah Operative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
43. i'm confused; is it approve/dis. of 'the deal' or of sentiment abou the de
al?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. The Deal Itself...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
45. Disapprove nt
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC