Newsweek, the Quran and the "Green Mushroom", FAIR Alert

[G_j]

FAIR-L
Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting
Media analysis, critiques and activism

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2519

May 19, 2005

ACTION ALERT:
Newsweek, the Quran and the "Green Mushroom"
Following the real rules of modern journalism

Newsweek ran a sensational claim based on an anonymous source who turned out to be completely wrong. While one can't blame the subsequent violence entirely on this report, it's fair to say that credulous reporting like this contributed to a climate in which many innocent Muslims died.

The inaccurate Newsweek report appeared in the magazine's March 17, 2003 issue, on the eve of the invasion of Iraq. It read in part:

"Saddam could decide to take Baghdad with him. One Arab intelligence officer interviewed by Newsweek spoke of 'the green mushroom' over Baghdad--the modern-day caliph bidding a grotesque bio-chem farewell to the land of the living alongside thousands of his subjects as well as his enemies. Saddam wants to be remembered. He has the means and the demonic imagination. It is up to U.S. armed forces to stop him before he can achieve notoriety for all time."


Unlike a more recent Newsweek item (5/9/05), involving accusations that Guantanamo interrogators flushed a copy of the Quran down a toilet, Newsweek has yet to retract the bogus report about the "green mushroom" threat. The magazine's Quran charge has been linked to rioting in Afghanistan and elsewhere that has left at least 16 dead; alarmist coverage like Newsweek's about Saddam Hussein's nonexistent weapons of mass destruction paved the way for an invasion that has caused, according to the best epidemiological research available (Lancet, 11/20/04), an estimated 100,000 deaths.

Newsweek was right to retract the Quran story--mainly because the magazine claimed to have "sources" for the information, when Newsweek's subsequent descriptions of how it acquired the story mention only a single source. But it's far from clear that Newsweek's source was inaccurate in saying that U.S. investigators had uncovered abuse of a Quran in the course of a recent investigation; similar allegations have repeatedly been made by former Guantanamo prisoners (Washington Post, 3/26/03; London Guardian, 12/3/03; Daily Mirror, 3/12/04; Center for Constitutional Rights, 8/4/04; La Gazette du Maroc, 4/12/05; New York Times, 5/1/05; BBC, 5/2/05; cites compiled by Antiwar.com, 5/16/05).

Denials by the U.S. military that such incidents have occurred mean little; when any government holds prisoners in violation of international law, and denies them access to independent counsel or human rights groups, assertions by that government about how the prisoners are being treated can be given little weight. Eric Saar, a former U.S. Army sergeant who served as a translator at Guantanamo, has accused the Pentagon of engaging in organized efforts there to deceive outsiders: Citing a new book by Saar, the Washington Post reported (4/29/05) that "the U.S. military staged the interrogations of terrorism suspects for members of Congress and other officials visiting the military prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to make it appear the government was obtaining valuable intelligence."

It's certainly not the case that the Pentagon has been so attentive to Muslim sensitivities that such treatment of a Quran would be unthinkable. The Pentagon's deputy undersecretary for intelligence is Lt. Gen. William Boykin, who is notorious for suggesting that Allah was "an idol" and saying that the United States' enemies were led by "Satan," and would "only be defeated if we come against them in the name of Jesus." It was Boykin who reportedly ordered the coercive interrogation methods used at Guantanamo to be used at Iraq's Abu Ghraib as well (London Guardian, 5/20/04).

It has been repeatedly said--including by Newsweek itself, in its initial apology (5/23/05)--that the magazine's source erred in saying that the Quran incident was contained in a report for the Pentagon's Southern Command. In fact, the original report said that the incident was "expected" to be in the report--an expectation that could have easily been altered by the fact that the explosive allegation became public.

Newsweek's retraction of the Quran story, contrasted with the lack of any correction of its "green mushroom" claim and other similarly erroneous WMD coverage, is quite illustrative of the actual rules--quite different from the ostensible rules that are taught in journalism school--that govern contemporary journalism:

* Anonymous sources are fine, as long as they are promoting rather than challenging official government policy.

* It's all right for your reporting to be completely wrong, as long as your errors are in the service of power.

* The human cost of bad reporting need only be counted when people who matter are doing the counting.

ACTION: Please contact Newsweek editors and ask them to review the magazine's WMD coverage, and urge them to hold it to the same standards they applied to the Quran story.

CONTACT:
Newsweek
Phone: [phone]
mailto:[e-mail]

As always, please remember that your comments have more impact if you maintain a polite tone.
----------
Your donation to FAIR makes a difference:
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=103

Feel free to respond to FAIR ( [e-mail] ). We can't reply to everything, but we will look at each message. We especially appreciate documented examples of media bias or censorship. And please send copies of your email correspondence with media outlets, including any responses, to [e-mail] .

You can subscribe to FAIR-L at our web site: http://www.fair.org . Our subscriber list is kept confidential.
FAIR
[phone]
http://www.fair.org/
E-mail: [e-mail]

---

[Karenina]

1. Superb.

Simply superb.

[G_j]

3. at least two of us think so

:shrug:

[G_j]

2. Breaking: Red Cross Told of Quran Disrespect

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/wire/sns-ap-red-cross-guantanamo-quran,1,1989458.story?coll=sns-ap-world-headlines

Red Cross Told of Quran Disrespect
By SAM CAGE, Associated Press Writer


GENEVA -- The international Red Cross told U.S. authorities about allegations that American personnel at the Guantanamo Bay detention center showed disrespect to Islam's holy book, the Quran, a spokesman said Thursday.

Delegates from the International Committee of the Red Cross informed U.S. authorities, who took action to stop the alleged abuse, said spokesman Simon Schorno. He declined to specify the nature of the incidents.

"We're basically referring in general terms to disrespect of the Quran, and that's where we leave it," Schorno told The Associated Press. "We believe that since, U.S. authorities have taken the corrective measures that we required in our interventions."

About 15 people died in clashes with security forces in Afghanistan last week after Newsweek reported that U.S. interrogators had flushed a Quran down a toilet at the prison camp for terrorist suspects at the U.S. military base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The magazine later retracted the story.


..more..

[bpilgrim]

4. NEWSWEEK is a DISGRACE

http://images.globalfreepress.com

peace

[Frederik]

5. I loved it

wonderful.

[Just Me]

6. *LOL* good grief!!! Cherry-pickin' retractions, too!!!

The neoCONs may not "own" media,...but they sure as hell CONTROL IT!!!

The censorship is absolutely stunning!!!! DAMN!!! :grr:

[G_j]

12. & to hear Rs screaming outrage

as if they have some deep concern over truth telling is such a sick joke. The entire world knows they are full of it and more than half of America knows it too.

[LynnTheDem]

7. EXCELLENT! Superb black humor based on total fact.

* Anonymous sources are fine, as long as they are promoting rather than challenging official government policy.

* It's all right for your reporting to be completely wrong, as long as your errors are in the service of power.

* The human cost of bad reporting need only be counted when people who matter are doing the counting.

[DoYouEverWonder]

8. They nailed it.

now for the rest of the lies that the M$M has been spreading for their masters at Bu$hCo, how many lives have lost because of those lies?

[G_j]

10. shows all the 'hysteria' and 'outrage' over the Newsweek article

for what it is, another smokescreen. Notice also that the rest of the corporate media has played right along.

[G_j]

11. to clarify

I am not forgetting the anger over this in the middle east. But the hypocrisy of those RWingers screaming about this as if they cared about lives lost 'over there' knows no bounds.
Where has the outrage been as a hundred thousand Iraqis were slaughtered? Does anyone seriously believe this article has damaged America's image more than Bush's policies? No. I don't think more than a handful of the stupidest of freepers even believe that.

[Poiuyt]

9. For that matter, when is Bush going to apologize for all the mistakes HE'S

made? Yellowcake uranium, mushroom clouds, you know the ones. They've led to a lot more deaths that Newsweek's Quran story

[G_j]

13. kick