Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WHY did Pentagon issue a Gitmo memo on the Koran in 2003!?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 01:12 PM
Original message
WHY did Pentagon issue a Gitmo memo on the Koran in 2003!?
In a memorandum dated January 19, 2003, the Pentagon issued a detailed set of rules regarding the proper handling of the Koran at Gitmo (see this article from WaPo):

U.S. Long Had Memo on Handling of Koran

By Robin Wright
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, May 17, 2005; A03

More than two years ago, the Pentagon issued detailed rules for handling the Koran at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, requiring U.S. personnel to ensure that the holy book is not placed in "offensive areas such as the floor, near the toilet or sink, near the feet, or dirty/wet areas." (boldface added)

The three-page memorandum, dated Jan. 19, 2003, says that only Muslim chaplains and Muslim interpreters can handle the holy book, and only after putting on clean gloves in full view of detainees.

The detailed rules require U.S. Muslim personnel to use both hands when touching the Koran to signal "respect and reverence," and specify that the right hand be the primary one used to manipulate any part of the book "due to cultural associations with the left hand." The Koran should be treated like a "fragile piece of delicate art," it says.

The memo, written a year after the first detainees were brought to Guantanamo from Afghanistan, reflects what U.S. officials said was a specific policy on handling the Koran, one of the most sensitive issues to Muslims. The Pentagon does not have a similar policy regarding any other major religious book and takes "extra precautions" on the Muslim holy book, officials said.

________________

**Certainly this memorandum begs the question, why did the Pentagon feel the need to issue such a memorandum, at that time, in that amount of detail, and specific to Gitmo?**  

The memorandum was issued about a year after the first detainees were brought to Guantanamo.

The memorandum is three pages long, with the gist being "don't defile the Koran."  But instead of a short admonition, the memo goes into detailed, specific procedures, even describing with which hand the Koran should be held and how it should not be turned over when being wrapped in a towel.

The WaPo article above states that the Pentagon "does not have a similar policy regarding any other major religious book".  

Are we to believe that someone at the Pentagon spontaneously (and without precedent) decided, while wading through the blizzard of torture memos floating around, that the Pentagon should officially develop and distribute a three-page policy on the proper handling of the Koran so as not to offend the religious sensibilities of detainees at Gitmo?  

Why did the Pentagon feel the need to issue such a memorandum, at such a time, and in such detail?  Why would it be necessary?

Res ipsa loquitur. "The thing speaks for itself."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Foresight is their strong point, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh snap! You got it. They got THIS right, after all their other ERRORS?
yeah right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. notice how the Pentagon memo actually mentions "toilet"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, they didn't include the envelope that was addressed to
Mr. Wink Wink and Nudge Nudge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. yes - whatever you do, don't do this, bc it will really upset the detainee
(Heavy sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordmadr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. For the same reason any other safety related procedure is ever
implemented when someone hasn't had a bit of foresight...because some dumb ass messed up.

Having served in the U.S. Navy, we had these safety nets on our 5 inch gun system that blocked the crawl area into the upper part of the gun. This area is frequently accessed in order to perform routine maintenance on the gun system. There is a safety switch attached to the net that shuts down the power and dumps hydraulic pressure when the net is opened. Why you might ask, is this safety feature in place? The answer would be because some poor slob who wasn't thinking crawled up there while the gun was running and was promptly made into a pancake mush by the loading arm.

Olaf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. "WHY did Pentagon issue a Gitmo memo on the Koran in 2003!?"
Could it be the Koran-desecration inspired hunger strike at Gitmo in 2002?

What'd I win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. If only someone would have given them the soldiers name and the
stall number, they would have moved heaven and earth to stop any desecration, right?

Feh. The answer is they are LIARS, and BAD LIARS at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC