Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

REPORTERS RIP BUSH SPOKESMAN OVER NEWSWEEK MESS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
greatbubba Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 04:40 AM
Original message
REPORTERS RIP BUSH SPOKESMAN OVER NEWSWEEK MESS
REVENGE OF THE SITH PRESS: REPORTERS RIP BUSH SPOKESMAN OVER NEWSWEEK MESS

http://www.drudgereport.com/flash3mi1.htm

Mainline reporters moved into battle mode today during a White House press briefing -- as one of their own outlets continued to hemorrhage over a now retracted story!

Afghanistan's government said Tuesday that NEWSWEEK should be held responsible for damages caused by deadly anti-American demonstrations after the magazine alleged U.S. desecration of the Quran.

The White House said the United States' image abroad had suffered irreparable damage by the story.

But it was the press's turn to fight back as Bush spokesman Scott McClellan opened his briefing to questions.



Q With respect, who made you the editor of Newsweek? Do you think it's appropriate for you, at that podium, speaking with the authority of the President of the United States, to tell an American magazine what they should print?

MR. McCLELLAN: I'm not telling them. I'm saying that we would encourage them to help --

Q You're pressuring them.

MR. McCLELLAN: No, I'm saying that we would encourage them --

Q It's not pressure?

MR. McCLELLAN: Look, this report caused serious damage to the image of the United States abroad. And Newsweek has said that they got it wrong. I think Newsweek recognizes the responsibility they have. We appreciate the step that they took by retracting the story. Now we would encourage them to move forward and do all that they can to help repair the damage that has been done by this report. And that's all I'm saying. But, no, you're absolutely right, it's not my position to get into telling people what they can and cannot report....

Q Are you asking them to write a story about how great the American military is; is that what you're saying here?

MR. McCLELLAN: Elisabeth, let me finish my sentence. Our military --

Q You've already said what you're -- I know what -- how it ends.

MR. McCLELLAN: No, I'm coming to your question, and you're not letting me have a chance to respond. But our military goes out of their way to handle the Koran with care and respect. There are policies and practices that are in place. This report was wrong. Newsweek, itself, stated that it was wrong. And so now I think it's incumbent and -- incumbent upon Newsweek to do their part to help repair the damage. And they can do that through ways that they see best, but one way that would be good would be to point out what the policies and practices are in that part of the world, because it's in that region where this report has been exploited and used to cause lasting damage to the image of the United States of America. It has had serious consequences. And so that's all I'm saying, is that we would encourage them to take steps to help repair the damage. And I think that they recognize the importance of doing that. That's all I'm saying.

Q As far as the Newsweek article is concerned, first, how and where the story came from? And do you think somebody can investigate if it really happened at the base, and who told Newsweek? Because somebody wrote a story.

MR. McCLELLAN: I think Newsweek has talked about it. They took it --

Developing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ariellyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. The media wakes up...whodathunkit?
:shrug:

Bravo to the journalists. So few of them are left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatbubba Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agree!
I thought all the journalist of today were nice word (hookers) I guess not some still have some balls in them. No offense to anyone I am just sick and tired of all the kiss ass reporters who kiss bush for everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paul Dlugokencky Donating Member (409 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. "this time, it's personal"
Maybe some of them are starting to finally feel that their profession, as they knew it or thought it was, has become a joke.



http://www.cafepress.com/kickindemocrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I think most reporters have known this for awhile, but haven't been
Edited on Wed May-18-05 06:12 AM by Clark2008
able to do anything about it and keep their livelihoods.

Maybe they've been fighting from the inside for awhile, but we don't know about it, because the "gatekeepers" (some editors and the publishers, producers and corporate shills) have been keeping their stories watered down.

I rather suspect that the types of people who choose reporting as a profession (and I was one for 12 years, so I'm one of those "types") are, by and large, head-strong and feisty.

Sure, they could throw up their hands and quit (I left to raise a son - reporting is hardly condusive to single-parenting. I didn't leave from frustration) or they could stay and fight and fight and fight and eventually break through.

We've seen some who have left come forward recently and, now, I think we're starting to see the break-through of those who have stayed and fought.

I know it would piss me off, royally, if some shill like Snootie McMoonface tried to tell me how to do my job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. scotty-dog
will be handing out a list of pre-approved one-source annonymous people.

I'm reminded of an old commercial when I watch the daily spews - is it real or is it memorex -- in this case it's "is it propaganda or a soon-to-be-retracted story?"

the MSM has shown their teeth in the past, but in the end they just sit down and drink their kook-aid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. A question for you Scotty....
Do you think Afghanistan is pissed off because the story is manufactured, or is it pissed off because it is a real story which harms the image of the U.S?

A little truth or dare here. I think after the lies you have pulled and not answered the Iraq memos, without a Jeff Gannon to sugarcoat your testiculur fortitude you could at least be up and straight with the American press.

Beam me up scotty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Also
the demonstrations in Afghanistan were not connected to the story, according to general Myers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Hi LightningFlash!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. NEWSWEEK's own editor was on MSRNC yesterday morning...
rolling over and playing dead for the bush junta*. He is staying on message. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. Very gratifying. But do they have any...
...intention of following through? Is this the point where they are FINALLY saying they've had enough of being stenographers?

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. i love the combativeness for the sake of the truth.
but couldn't she{you'd think she knew} have gotten to the fact that others have reported the same thing for a long time?

it's not an uncorroborated story.

the pentagon previous to this hasn't moved to put the fire out, why now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flammable Materials Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. Enjoy it while it lasts.
It won't last long.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. Who is the reporter Scotty calls by name: "Elisabeth" --
Bumiller???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. Well, it's ridiculous to blame a squib in a magazine for the rise in,...
,...anti-Americanism. We all know who asserted that faux charge of guilt,....the very ones who bear the guilt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. Unfortunately, if Jell-O is the only thing you've been served for 5 years
and then someone suddenly hands you a banana, it looks pretty firm. I can understand how that banana could be perceived as a spine, but at the end of the day it isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alexisfree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-05 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
16. we need ...........a
Edited on Wed May-18-05 10:02 AM by alexisfree
MEDIA REFORM!!!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC