Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Armstrong Williams report, did you all see it??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 12:21 AM
Original message
The Armstrong Williams report, did you all see it??
Why Armstrong Williams Wants Us To Forgive and Forget
Feature Submitted by Bob Burton on Wed, 05/11/2005 - 08:23.
Topics: U.S. government | public relations | media | education
There's an old PR trick that if bad news can't be suppressed, its release should be stalled until late on a Friday afternoon or just before a holiday break. It's a trick that served the U.S. Department of Education well when, late on Friday April 15, it released its Office of Inspector General's damning final report into the $240,000 Armstrong Williams contract to promote the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation.

The strategy behind the late Friday afternoon news dump is simple: most media outlets will be squeezed for space to cover a late-breaking story, looming deadlines will ensure harried journalists don't have time to get much further than the executive summary, and by the time Monday rolls around, it will be seen as stale news by editors with the attention span of a gnat.

Reading the 20-page report, which was prompted by Greg Toppo's exposé on the Williams contract in USA Today, it's easy to see why the Education Department wanted to bury it. The report chronicles the deception, bungling and mismanagement behind the Williams contract.

While newspapers such as the Washington Post, L.A. Times, New York Times, and USA Today covered the Education Department report, most of the finer detail went unreported. (Surprisingly, none added a link on their websites to the actual report.)

More...

http://www.prwatch.org/node/3632

And here is the report, so very under-reported:

http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oig/a19f0007.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. The late Fri release is nothing new.
I used that for years in the business community. If you have good news, you release it Mon or Tues. If it's bad, you release it Fri afternoon...and as close to 4:30 as possible.

We need to promote this $250,000 info starting Monday AM in every outlet we have! You know most of the cable news is monitoring the blog sites and reporting on them too, so lets just DO IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. "harried journalists " ???
Yeah, like they're soooo worn out from transcribing press releases?

The Saturday programs on the Cable "News" Channels are amazing. It's like there's no news on Saturday. It's all 'public interest' nonsense.

Every week-end I wonder why the supposedly 24/7 "news" channels shut down every Saturday and Sunday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Did you see the GAO's May 12th report regarding VNRs as propaganda?
Edited on Mon May-16-05 12:59 AM by Carolab
http://www.gao.gov/atext/d05643t.txt

This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-05-643T
entitled 'Video News Releases: Unattributed Prepackaged News Stories
Violate Publicity or Propaganda Prohibition' which was released on May 12, 2005.

<snip>

"HHS and ONDCP both commissioned and distributed prepackaged news stories and introductory scripts about their activities that were designed to be indistinguishable from news stories produced by private news broadcasters. In neither case did the agency include any statement or other indication in its news stories that disclosed to the television viewing audience (the target of the purported news stories) that the agency wrote and produced those news stories. In other words, television-viewing audiences did not know that stories they watched on television news programs about the government were, in fact, prepared by the government. We therefore concluded that those prepackaged news stories violated the publicity or propaganda prohibition."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Same thing with pink slips.
Edited on Mon May-16-05 01:24 AM by NightOwwl
The company gets rid of you on Friday, hoping that by Monday you will be nothing but a dim memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC