|
Because they have tuned their message to resonate with what more voters perceive to be in their own interests.
Our job is to give our message the same resonance. That does not mean changing our message, or - God forbid - "republicanizing" it. It means showing how what we promote can help a majority of Americans live the kind of life they want.
Despite caricatures to the contrary, what most people want is not a McMansion and a Cadillac, but instead, job security, a sense of fairness in public policy, evidence that they are protected from enemies abroad and criminals at home, and as little interference in their private lives as is compatible with society's best interests. They want to know that older people and the disadvantaged are taken care of, and they wish to be free from fear that they are one major illness away from catastrophe.
These things are all more likely to result from progressive policies than conservative policies. However, no amount of whining, finger-pointing, and Rove conspiracy theorizing will accomplish the needed changes in perception. We have to lead by reinforcing a positive, credible, and visionary message. We need to sound like we believe our message is strong enough to defeat theirs, and not make excuses about MSM, secret Skull and Bones cabals, PNAC, and the rest. I'm not saying these things should be ignored, but every political movement in every era has always faced obstacles. Contests between political opponents are trials of strength -- strength of ideas. We should behave as though our message *is* stronger and able to withstand whatever potshots those chumps take. Momentum is a curious beast. It works against you before it works for you. Only the persistent can tame it.
Bin Laden himself said it: when people see a strong horse and a weak horse, by nature, they will like the strong horse.
Let's be the strong horse.
|