Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Judge Who Exonerated Cheney is on Exxon Payroll

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
chlamor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 08:36 PM
Original message
The Judge Who Exonerated Cheney is on Exxon Payroll
This judge needs to be removed from his position. Conflict of interest is the polite term used to describe this. It's better name is collusion and corruption



Judge who exonerated Cheney is on the payroll of Exxon

Original link: http://www.legitgov.org/news_cheney_task_force_judge_051005.html

10 May 2005 23:00 GMT. Updated: 13 May 2005 18:00

U.S. court dismisses Cheney energy task force case 10 May 2005 2:56 PM ET--A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday threw out a lawsuit that sought details about Vice President Dick Cheney's 2001 energy policy task force that critics say secretly formed policy favorable to the industry.
The unanimous ruling ordered a federal judge to dismiss the lawsuit by the Sierra Club environmental group and the watchdog group Judicial Watch that sought to learn about contacts between task force members and industry executives.
"We hold that plaintiffs have failed to establish any duty, let alone a clear and indisputable duty, owed to them by the federal government" under the law in question, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Judge A. Raymond Randolph wrote in the 13-page ruling.


Judge A. Raymond Randolph - eh?
Let's look him up. Appointed by George H. W. Bush in 1990. Pal of Microsoft in the celebrated anti-trust case of 2001.
Judges poised to rule on Microsoft 31 May, 2001, 22:10 GMT 23:10 UK --Microsoft's fate hangs in the balance as a Court of Appeal considers whether to overturn the break-up order. A ruling is thought to be imminent and BBC News Online's Kevin Anderson in Washington takes a look at the judges making the decision...
In 1998, two judges on the appeals court ruled that Microsoft did not violate a consent decree when it bundled its Internet Explorer web browser with Windows. In that case, Judge Stephen Williams, appointed by Ronald Reagan in 1986, and Judge Raymond Randolph, appointed by George Bush in 1990, ruled that Microsoft did not illegally "tie" the browser to its market-dominant operating system.

And SAY! what do you know?

He is with the George Mason University
Law and Economics Center - funded by Exxon!

George Mason University, Law and Economics Center has received $115,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
Say Hey! Its good being a judge!

Additional source: Antitrust Law & Economics Review Vol. 25, No. 2, Judicial Seminars: Economics, Academia, and Corporate Money In America --by Nan Aron, Barbara Moulton, and Chris Owens '6 Mornings Per Week' "Although closely affiliated with GMU , the Law and Economics Center is run independently and is supported entirely by private donations. Corporate interests provide a significant share of the Center's funding. In 1991, for example, when the Center spent $380,000 in 'direct' expenses for federal judges' seminars, 31% of the Center's total income of $967,917 came from corporate contributors. These donors included corporate giants Exxon, General Motors, Bethlehem Steel, ITT, and Pfizer, Inc., the General Electric and Mobil Foundations, and the Monsanto Fund. Most of the remainder of the Center's 1991 budget (65%) came from independent foundations, including Olin, Bradley, and Scaife, which have been key players in efforts to mold a jurisprudence more favorable to business interests. The Center's basic 'economics institute' for federal judges is held once a year, spans a two-week period and is designed to familiarize participants with the fundamental tools of microeconomic theory."

http://www.legitgov.org/news_cheney_task_force_judge_051005.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why is this a surprise to anyone with a pulse?
Cheney went duck hunting with Fat Tony. What more needs to be said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't that illegal?
Oh... wait. They're reTHUGs. Nevermind....

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. So when one of these treasonous assholes finally get nailed...
And using the BushCo. methodology for obtaining valuable information for National Security, can we send them to Gitmo to be tortured into providing names of all BushCo. & Right Wing Traitors to this Nation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firenze777 Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who needs activist judges
when u have bought and paid for judges? And corporate media that today focused on sainthood for the late pope and human billboards.....no mention of Blair's memo, or the president being clueless about the plane, or Bolton's sexcapades.....or....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC