Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Abu Ghraib - One Year Later and No Accountability

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 07:12 PM
Original message
Abu Ghraib - One Year Later and No Accountability
Well, I've been tracking information on various cases of abuse in Abu Ghraib and other locations for a year now. We've since learned that the White House orchestrated a "torture memo" that redefined torture into very narrow terms in an attempt to isolate the administration from wrongdoing in the prisons in Afghanistan, Guantanamo Bay, Abu Ghraib, and elsewhere.

We've seen then-Attorney General John Ashcroft stammer and evade questions from the United States Senate and fail to provide the Senate Investigative Committee with the paperwork and justification requested.

We've seen the results of the administration's plans to torture prisoners in Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib. The information obtained has been questionable and the outcry from Iraqis and others around the world is evident partly in the fierceness of the resistance in Iraq and in the fear and doubts in the hearts and minds of average Iraqis who now despise the occupying forces and the puppet government that was put into place (and still largely exists.)

We've seen this administration criticize other countries, including Iraq, for committing abuses toward prisoners but yet this administration still denies any involvement in the widespread torture going on under its own direction.

We've also learned more detail of the process known as rendition wherein prisoners are sent to other countries to be tortured and abuse, thereby, presumably, removing them from any culpability.

When this administration came into power it was under the guise of restoring honor and integrity to the White House in the wake of the Clinton adminstration (and the near-impeachment of Clinton). What we've seen, however, is the complete opposite of that promise. This administration has waged a war on the truth and all but destroyed the integrity of the office of the President of the United States of America.

Our media has also been complicit in all of this by failing to be critical of the administration and its policies. Instead, it has cowered in fear of being kicked out of the White House press corps. Well, unless you're a gay prostitute that writes for ethereal news sites. But, we can't fully blame the reporters. They're only doing what they're allowed to do under the conservative ownership of the media companies. And that ownership is becoming less and less in number due to media conglomeration.

What can we expect for the next year? Well, imo, we're seeing signs of spines growing in members of the House and Senate, particularly a few key Democrats but even some moderate Republicans. We're also seeing the effect the internet can have on news via the blogosphere and online fora such as this one.

It's my sincere hope that this administration finally comes clean with the American people and the world and admits it's failures and it's dishonesty. But, I'm also a realist so I won't be holding my breath. I fear impeachment may be nigh, esp. if the Democrats regain control of the House and/or Senate in 2006. Will that fix things in this country? Doubtful. It would likely cause more instability in our already fragile economy but it would bring the criminals to justice.


We can only hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. You know....
...they had the attorney for what's his face.. Lynndie England's ex-lover, on Hardball.

Listening to him, I just got this horrible feeling that he (yes, HE.. the attorney) was protecting the upper echelon and not his client(s).

It seriously made me wonder who he was truly representing.

Matthews pretty much said that he was astounded that no one (Sanchez, etc.) took one bit of heat.

The lawyer just made some wimpy statement to the tune of :shrug: "that's because THEY weren't involved, yada, yada, yada..."

He didn't seem to be on the up-and-up. If it's attorneys like him representing the prison staff, I can see why Sanchez and Pentagon Officials were let off the hook scott free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. THERE WAS ACCOUNTABILITY...two women and one man took the
blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's not accountability...that's scapegoating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I know, I know....I as being facetious. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe this new book will kickstart some investigations and indictments
Soldier lifts lid on Camp Delta
For the first time, an army insider blows the whistle on human rights abuses at Guantánamo

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1479040,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC