Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think I figured out why religion dominates the media now.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 03:58 PM
Original message
I think I figured out why religion dominates the media now.
I mean, I know generally why it dominates the media. But I've been wondering, why the dramatic shift since the election?

Well, what dominated the media from 9/01 until 11/04? Iraq, war and terrorism. Everywhere you looked and listened, the media was talking about militarism. For comparison, from '98 to '00 all the media talked about was buying stocks...and people bought stocks...and people stayed in stocks even when insiders were bailing out. (I have a friend who was going to sell her shares when they were high before the crash, but she saw an interview with a woman on MSNBC who criticized other women from being too cautious and selling when they should be holding -- having cable cost her much more than just her monthly cable bill).

Talking about stocks all the time helped make some people rich, but it didn't help Republicans win the election in 2000. What helped them win the election in 2004 was the fact that the media stopped talking about capital markets (and Enron and World Com and Arthur Anderson) and they started talking about militarism.

What are the most conservative institutions in American public life? The military, marriage and most churches. What helps Republicans win elections? Reaffirming conservative institutions -- ie, encouraging people to look at the world through the lenses of conservative institutions.

For whatever reason, the media has let go of Iraq and has moved on to religion. Perhaps they see Iraq running its course? Perhaps they know that the next Republican candidate for president will not be associated with Iraq the way Bush is (only Cheney and Rumsfield could run on Iraq).

I think the shift in focus to religion is a conscious effort by the media to promote a mood in America that affirms conservative themes, values and models for seeing the world -- it's an attempt to create resonating thought processes that get people to vote Republican and it's consciously substituting Iraq with Religion.

The major media will never strike notes like, say, workers rights, the University, class and opportunity which would help resonate progressive models for perceiving the world. (Could you imagine if all the stories in the news were about those things? Wouldn't it be nice?) However, all the bloggers and podcasters and others do have the power to encourage progressive models for seeing the world...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AValdoux Donating Member (738 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ratings
The media is driven by ratings. I think the proper way to describe it is "corporate media". It is for the corporation, by the corporation and in the best interest of the corporation. It has nothing to do with journalism any more. I also call it 'info-tainment'. Religion is the new buzz word. Bush worship has passed, as did militarism, Clinton bashing, etc. They are just appealing to their established ratings base. The 24-hour news channels absorbed the old 'Current Affair' viewers. Now they can watch whenever they want and pretend they are knowledgable. No more tabloid stigma. Look at the advertisers and you will know who watching. It is no longer referred to as "The Press", media is the accurate word for it.


AValdoux
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I don't think ratings explains why the media was obsessed with
the stock market and Clinton from 98 to 2000, with Iraq from 2001 to, literally, election day 2004, and now religion.

I think it's about framing and I think it's obvious whose interests are served by the "buy stock/Clinton bad/terror everywhere/religion everywhere" frames.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tex-wyo-dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. If you remember in the days after the election...
all the pollsters were claiming that it was "values voters" that pushed ** over the top and that values was the top issue people voted on. I believe a short time after that it was found that that really wasn't the case due to poor or misleading polling questions, but the media hung onto that assumption.

What it all boils down to is that religion and it's role in our society is a huge distraction and is the ultimate wedge issue that has Rove written all over it. I've suspected for a long time that the U.S. media is being steered to concentrate on these highly divisive and consuming issues, and away from the deteriorating condition in Iraq and the administration's disastrous foreign policy as a whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think the script was written before the misleading poll questions were..
...written.

I think that the poll questions were designed to get the result they did and was part of the plan to create the religion frame for 2005-2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC