Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So the Repugs love to tell us that no new oil refineries...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
tekriter Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:38 AM
Original message
So the Repugs love to tell us that no new oil refineries...
have been built since about 900 years ago because of those damned enviro-whackos...

but can anyone tell me how long it's ACTUALLY been? Anyone have some evidence of new refineries built in the last decade or 2??

Got a lotta freepers to shut up here...need ammunition!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Some ammunition
I don't know when the last refinery was built, but I did some research on refinery output last week.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=3568621&mesg_id=3568621


I averaged the weekly output of gasoline for the first quarter of 1995 and compared it to 2005.

The 1995 weekly average output is 7,334,538 barrels per day.
The 2005 weekly average output is 8,458,583 barrels per day.

We're producing 1,124,045 MORE barrels per day on average than we were 10 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. There is no shortage of gasoline...
I have yet to see any pumps shut down or lines of cars waiting at the gas stations. So how can anyone say that there is a shortage of refineries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. there has been no new refineries
built in years....but one has to have supplies to feed them. i heard that statement from dummy and wonder if he is completely clueless..yup he is is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. The US oil industry agreed not to build more refineries.
Building more would have up driven supply, lowering price/profit. This came out during the phony gas crisis and the Enron scandal. It wasn't the environmentalist, it was the capitalist manipulating supply to up their profit.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Two things
Years ago, Standard Oil was broken up into several companies to break up their monopoly. In the last few years, they're all merging together again, "to better compete". Yeah bullshit.

For the last 10-15 years, these newly merged companies have been shutting down refineries all over the place. Now, all of a sudden, gee whiz, we don't have enough refining capacity. Better throw out all them pesky environmental rules and regulations, so we can get more gas to the 'murkin people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. They will also be immune from bearing any responsibility
for their actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. yup -I think it went
from 400 refineries down to 123(although those 123 have been expanded to increase output)but it clearly leaves the power in fewer hands. (I heard these numbers but haven't independently verified them yet).

But, there are about 5 majors right now and I predict it will soon be 3 as the monopoly comes back together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here's what I heard
This comes from one of the peak oil pages. I don't recall which one (sorry). Oil companies stopped building refineries because the existing one could handle all the crude we could get and building new ones would be a waste of time because there would be no additional crude to put into them.

Envinronmental rules or not, big oil would build refineries IF they wanted to build refineries. We've all seen that sort of thing happen in other industries. The fact that haven't built refineries is because they don't see any money in building refineries unless there's more crude coming, and at this point (84 millin barrels a day coming out of the ground) there's probably never going to be much more than that.

It's sort of like standing in the middle of a desert and saying "The reason we have no lumber is because the environmentalists won't let us build lumber mills." So the pres decides to build lumber mills. Only where are the trees in the desert that can be sent to the lumber mills? The "we need more refineries" bullshit is just more flim flam. That won't solve the gas price problem. In fact nothing will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. The oil companies know all about Peak Oil...
They cannot see sinking any of their obscene profits into new refineries when they know the oil will not last long enough to pay for their construction and start-up costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. Found this:
There hasn't been a major new refinery in the United States since 1976, and experts say none is on the horizon. Refineries are expensive, and nobody likes having a big, smelly refinery near his or her back yard.

But another reason you won't see any refineries springing up soon is that oil companies like things the way they are: Their refineries are operating near capacity, so they sell practically every drop of fuel they make.


http://www.pcps.org/pdf/FASB_Conditional_ARO_Obligations_ED_TIC.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. Its much cheaper to expand existing refineries
There havent been any new refineries built since the 70's - and there hasnt been a need for them yet. It is much cheaper and more cost effective for oil companies to expand and renovate existing refineries. We have been able to expand our capacity without building new refineries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3waygeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
9. Can't help you there...
Everything I've read indicates that the last new refinery in the US was built in 1976. I've never seen any data regarding the expansion or closure of existing refineries, so I don't know how refinery capacity has changed over the last 30 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Hi 3waygeek!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. Don't fall into their trap. Just defend our doctrine of conservation and
Edited on Sun May-01-05 10:59 AM by mtnsnake
our research into alternative energy sources, and you'll have all the ammo you need. Don't let them put you on the defensive on something where there's nothing to be ashamed about. Be proud that we are "enviro-whackos".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. Eviron-whackos? Really?
Then why did they shut the largest US refinery in California last year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. Tell them
If they wanted one during the 8 years Bush was governor of Texas, what would Bush have done. Answer everything needed to make it happen.

Second point: Off-shore refineries. These are being built for the same reason companies move manufacturing off-shores. Cheaper labor and cheaper building costs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. I think the oil co's actually want to limit the # of refineries.
They use that as a tool to justify price gouging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
15. Tell its the free market, and to go back to Russia if they don't like it.
Refineries were OVERBUILT. Refining wasn't profitable because of too much capacity and not enough demand. Result: low prices for gas and oil endproducts. Now, demand is just catching up, prices are rising, and refiners are making their first profits in years.

So Repugs, being the first to talk economics and the last to understand it, think that somebody is going to build refineries to PREVENT high prices, that the industry is going to purposely go back to teh era of too much capacity for them to make a profit, just to keep prices low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC