Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cracks in decaying shell of Chernobyl reactor threaten second disaster

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 09:00 PM
Original message
Cracks in decaying shell of Chernobyl reactor threaten second disaster
By Andrew Osborn in Moscow
28 April 2005


A leading Russian scientist has claimed that the sarcophagus entombing Chernobyl's broken nuclear reactor is dangerously degraded and he warned that its collapse could cause a catastrophe on the same scale as the original accident almost 20 years ago. >>>snip

Earlier this year Julia Marusych, the head of information at Chernobyl, admitted on Russian TV that the sarcophagus was in appalling condition: "The construction is unstable, unsafe, and does not meet any safety requirements."

The sarcophagus was hastily thrown together after the explosion as a desperate attempt to contain the world's worst nuclear accident. Many of the workers who toiled on it have since died of cancer and the sarcophagus itself began showing signs of serious stress in the early 1990s.

Built to last 50 years,experts were forced to reduce its recommended lifespan to just 20 years meaning a replacement is due in 2006.

http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/story.jsp?story=633671
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, let's put nuclear reactors all over the US. We can handle any
problem. If they could run SUV's off this stuff they would be built in every state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Built to last
Edited on Sat Apr-30-05 09:14 PM by IChing
50 years the cover was,
boy, planed obsolescence, or just the best technology, that money can buy at the time?
Good thing our education system or economy is not in trouble here. But we know the future don't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. There is no comparison between U.S. and Soviet reactors.
The concrete sarcophagus suffered budget issues though. Someone has to pay for it, and they have to raise the funds fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-05 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. You don't get it
You think that the American educational economic society can last as long
as compared to the Soviet society, to support someone that economically has to build control something after a collapse of an economic/ political system,

Of course that could never happen here? Right? You and the US are too smart for that,
Right?
built a cover to last, how long? So you trust the new faith base scientific education
that is being promoted in this country? We are talking about how long, that this conscious aware, non "homer" worker, is there? We should pay for this education?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Pravda reported on this a few days ago its disturbing
and nobody is doing anything!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC