Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can you be discriminated against for being divorced?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:03 AM
Original message
Can you be discriminated against for being divorced?
I know it doesn't happen, but could it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. It could if fundamentalists reinforce the old stigmas
that there was something bad about you, immoral, if you got divorced.

I'm divorced, so I've wondered the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teenagebambam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. Are you kidding?
With all the divorced Fundies running around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Fundies' love of sinning is exceeded
only by their love of upbraiding one another for said "sins."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zerex71 Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think so.
But then again, I'm one of the ones who might be considered discriminatory. Not in actual practice with regards to things like salaries, housing, etc. because I'm not in a position to discriminate on those things, but someone who's been divorced, in my book, is still (a bit) tainted. That's my opinion, of course, your mileage may vary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gpandas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. how perfectly shallow you are! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I am desperate to know
how a person who is divorced is tainted. Please expand on that a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zerex71 Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
42. I knew this was going to happen.
So, I will explain it as best I can while remaining doubtful that any of you will understand what I'm driving at.

I've been single now forever. Sure, I've had some relationships, maybe two that really left an impact on me, the rest being just transitory stories. So that's my story.

But also, there is a very strong feeling of liberating empowerment in being single, and in watching people get all giddy entering into marriage for what seems these days more like the ceremony and the clinking glasses and the Chicken Dance than it is for sitting down, understanding what a lifelong commitment means, and understanding that the thing's got to be rock-solid, otherwise you're going to end up divorced or at the very least, have some serious problems.

My point is that I take pride in the fact that I have not allowed myself to be suckered into any situations just because it was the thing to do, I was weak, or anything like that. I'm sure that a lot of people think when they are getting married that the marriage act alone just automatically solves any problems that might arise. Fact is, it won't. Caveat emptor applies here more than anywhere.

I expect in people the mature understanding that you have to be keenly attuned to the other person, to be skeptical in a good way, and trust your intuition about the suitability of that person (or in knowing oneself good enough) to marry. Commensurate with that is the understanding that this should be the person you'd like to have as your mate, best friend, lover and lifelong partner if marriage is to retain that sort of sanctity (as opposed to the overblown 'sanctity' touted by the Wrong).

It is not a sufficient excuse for me to hear people blame divorce on some tangible act i.e. "he shtupped his secretary". My question to those people is, How did you not see he was the kind to do that? Unless one's feelings are blind to such a thing, and I have to say, people don't just suddenly do things without any warning.

Of course, there are a number of people to whom one could be married for twenty years and then find out they've been cheating/molesting/axe murdering people, but then I ask, How blind does a person have to be? Have you ever heard of asking questions or forcing accountability?

I don't have a lot of sympathy for divorced people these days -- and herein lies the taint -- because this culture produces a feeling of disposability about everything. Don't like your spouse? Ahh, just get a new one. That kind of mindset -- going into something as weighty as marriage with the idea tucked away in the back of one's mind that "well, if it gets so I can't handle it, I can always get out via a divorce" -- only promulgates the notion of laziness, of not working, or committing to something.

In point of fact I am effectively married to the Muse of music. But you know what? No matter how hard music's been for me, no matter how humbled or asskicked or sad I've been by it, I still stick it out, because I know that committing to something, dealing with its problems, and working these things out are how you're supposed to relate to something -- not bail because "ehh, it's tooo harrrrdd" (said in whiny voice).

Like abortion, I think divorce should only be used as a last resort -- not as an "out".

Could I like a divorced woman? Sure, and I probably have. Could I love one? Quite probably? Would I marry one? Doubtful -- and it's because I'm not there to be someone's "second choice" once they figured out they screwed up with the wrong guy. I'm worthy enough of being someone's first choice when they are exquisite enough to realize "hey, this guy's better than all the abusive, slothful, no-culture-having shlubs out there, someone who'll be there for me through thick and thin, values me like the person I want to be valued for, and will love me with all his capabilities", not thinking about porking some slut at a bar on a business trip out of town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Do you have a rule that women you date should be virgins?
or is it ok if they've had sex before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Love Bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. I can hardly wait to see what paragon of virtue you find to marry
If you can indeed find one. Good luck. The rest of us fallible humans will just have to cope with what we can find.

I hope when you ask women out you at least find out ahead of time if they've been divorced so you don't waste their time. Truth in advertising, and all that.

Someone once told me to be careful who you judge because very often a person becomes that very thing they condemn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. I don't believe the question of sympathy was asked
it was discrimination. Being a fallible human being and not omnipresent you really can't make judgment on each and every case of divorce and nor should you.

Yes, its true, sometimes folks make the mistake of marrying someone who goes on to diddle someone else. Are they guilty of bad judgment because they should've known better? I believe that is your thesis. Perhaps, but more likely they are guilty only of trusting someone. It is a necessary component of having a relationship.

Trusting someone leaves you open to violations of that trust. You take pride that you have never made that mistake. I find that so sad on so many levels.

Good luck to you, Sir, in your quest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #42
52. "Tainted". Hmm. Reminds me of a friend's definition of "taint"
He said the perineum was the "taint" - 'cause it t'aint ass and t'aint pussy!

You, on the other hand, are just ignorant. People change. Sometimes they change in a way neither of them could foresee which makes them completely incompatible. So, because they were foolish enough to once be in love and believe that neither of them would ever change, in your opinion, they should both remain together, miserable, just to honor some piece of paper?

Sorry, don't agree with that, no way, no how. I personally have never understood why a marriage contract is always assumed to be lifelong anyway - I think it should be renewable five-year terms. I certainly don't think anyone under 30 should be allowed to marry "for life." People change. People SHOULD change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. tainted?
explain, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Wow! Please explain "tainted"
There are many reasons people get divorced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. Woo hoo! I'm tainted!
:bounce:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Here's to being tainted
:toast: :toast: :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. we could all start our own little tainted group, eh?
:woohoo: :toast: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Taint me anytime, baby!
:woohoo: :bounce: :woohoo: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
50. Me Too!
rather than still be married to a cheater/abuser/alcoholic...
Actually, my marriage tainted me, not my divorce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Count me in
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
43. Nah.
You're just a taint. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. Tainted Love, ooooooh!
Touch me baby, taint me!!!

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. It happens in the catholic church--no wafer for YOU!
Course, if you aren't famous, who's gonna know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillowTree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
21. As a matter of fact...
....that's completely untrue and a widely-held misunderstanding about the Catholic Church.

Divorce does not disqualify a Catholic from receiving any of the Church's sacraments except Matrimony, and that is restored if the Church grants an annulment. It is only if a divorced Catholic remarries outside the Church without benefit of an annulment that access to the other sacraments are denied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
49. Well, remarriage was implied, I probably should have so stated
If you are the "victim" of the breakup, the injured party, you are fine, so long as there's no remarrying sans permiso. But if you abandon your marital duties to go play in the field of the bored, then technically, you are off the rolls.

In actual fact, there's no way they can tell you by your scarlet D, unless you are in a small nosy parish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
55. My mom is Catholic and her marriage is not recognized by the Church
Because her husband (also Catholic) was married for 3 yrs and divorced prior to their marriage instead of having that marriage annulled.

What is sad is that she cares and she still wants to get that marriage annulled and then have a church ceremony so it will be recognized. They've been married for 22 yrs now...

Even sadder is that MY marriage is recognized by the Church, since it was a first marriage for both, no prior children and we married in a church - but I don't give a rat's ass. The only validation I need that my marriage is *sound* is from my husband. It makes me sad for her since it obviously bothers her.

Is it true discrimination though? I dunno. She's Catholic by choice, and that's a tenet of Catholicism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm discriminated against because I'm single / never married
Does that count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU9598 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kinda
You could be discriminated against due to a divorce, but it is not illegal discrimination. Just like being gay - yes, you will be discriminated against but unless there is a state law or city ordinances in effect it doesn't become illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. I do know that a divorced person cannot be a pastor in certain xtian
churches. One of my friend's brother had a mid-life career change (from stock trader to Lutheran minister), ended up getting a divorce (his wife was used to the money), and ended up losing his job because he got divorced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. Give it time
Edited on Wed Apr-27-05 11:09 AM by BattyDem

Since pharmacists are fighting for the right to "discriminate" against certains types of medication based upon their religious and moral views and doctors are fighting for the right to discriminate against gay people (in Michigan) based upon their religious and moral views, I can't help but wonder how long it will be before other people, including employers, will be allowed to discriminate against anyone they choose ... based upon their religious and moral views. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. nah, genie's out of the bottle
Edited on Wed Apr-27-05 11:13 AM by bunkerbuster1
Ronnie Raygun was President, Randal Terry heads the leading domestic-terror outfit, Newt Gingrich thinks he can be the next President.

All divorced, and plenty more where they came from.

"christians" believe in choice--for their menfolk, when something younger and slinkier comes along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. True, but they could discriminate against divorced women ...
but not against divorced men. That would be so typical of them! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. That was the way of it originally
The batchelor or widowed guy was a fixture int he workplace. Those were the euphamisms we used then.

But a woman was expected to get married again, to have her husband look after her, and not get a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. It's not a protected class under the ADA or any state laws I know
So theoretically, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Actually, in Wisconsin:
http://www.dwd.state.wi.us/er/discrimination_civil_rights/publication_erd_6160_pweb.htm

Protected Classes Year WI
Adopted Federal
Laws

Marital Status Status of being married, single, divorced, separated or widowed.
1982
N/A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. Legally, in most areas -- no.
I'm not sure if "marital status" is a protected class federally, but it is in most states.

However, plenty of people have built-in biases, and won't vote for/rent an apartment to/hire someone who's of a different race/disabled/divorced -- and there's really not much you can do, since it's hard to prove. Especially with hiring -- usually, an interviewer can give a perfectly legitimate reason for not hiring someone; you have to prove a pattern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
18. Yes, It DOES Happen
I've been discriminated against for being divorced, for being disabled, for being indigent, for being Christian, for being female, for being anti-corruption, for being young, (and later, for being older), for being... well, even just for BEING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
19. damn well better if we can discriminate against gays per bible
Edited on Wed Apr-27-05 11:16 AM by seabeyond
they had better be getting more consistant. divorce is right next to gay and many many more places thru out

you know how many divorced baptists there are, i am just amazed. two three marriages
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. great quote --Joe Scarborough
"There are some people out there who are Christians...who believe that homosexuality is a sin. You know what? I'm a Christian. I do believe that it's a sin. You know what else? I believe divorce is a sin. Guess what? I've been divorced. Guess what? Jesus talks about divorce a lot more than he talks about homosexuality. I don't know why people obsess over it so much, but they do. Wait a second, I do know why they obsess over it. Because they get votes bashing gays."
--Joe Scarborough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. yes, was amazing watching him spew this
Edited on Wed Apr-27-05 11:36 AM by seabeyond
truly, for his obtuse and looking hte other way as he preaches, for him to have concluded this, i thought wow. bill maher. yes i heard. and just right

another thing that has to start being said, against abortion, wear condoms dudes. we have a lot of men telling women to have their babies, they are producing without accepting a single responsibility. we have religions telling of the sin of woman that choices yet not a word to the males.

this is the absurdity in these moral judging issues, and why this is law this is not..........cannot work

yes i was surprised with scarsborough and so true. tried to back out once it dawned on him what he said, as maher jumped on it

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. I'm still shaking...
I can't believe I agree with most of what Scarborough just said ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. lol lol it was a mouth dropping open moment, n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #19
51. Jesus Said Nothing About Gays
other than "Love your neighbor".
And for divorce, The Bible says it's ok in the case of adultery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Biology Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
22. Absolutely!
Especially if you are a male. I've got a 50/50 court ordered shared custody arrangement. Get a call from a school nurse that your kid is sick? Oh - your the Dad and divorced? I need to speak with the mother. Oh, your kid is injured and in the emergency room? Where's the mother for permission?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. woma here, i hear ya...........pisses me off
my brother trying to keep up with daughters grades and schoolin and was in the court order. man he had to fight

you are right and this is bullshit. one of the things us women have to jump on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
29. In the South your are discrimanated for everything if you arent a bible
Banger..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. That is simply not true. I'm from the South and I live here.
Please, no Southern bashing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In_The_Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
32. It happens and it's wrong !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
36. I was told that my Allstate car insurance cost would go up
because of my divorce. This was in Georgia.

They had a rule that if you were under 25 the rates were higher for singles than married people. But, if you get divorced and you were over 25 and a woman, then your premium went up. WTF?

I immediately switched companies.

I'm with one of the three top rated companies in the USA now.

My agent was and is a Democratic State Representative.
Isn't that ironic, don't ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Singleterri Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. Just about all insurance companies give better rates
to married couples no matter what the age. I doubt it had to do with you getting divorced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #36
54. I think that's because you went from married to single
Not divorced, per say. Most companies offer discounts for more than one driver, like they do for more than one vehicle. I know that when we dropped a vehicle once on a policy, our rate went UP which made no sense. More to insure one car than two? But there you have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murphymom Donating Member (443 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
39. One indirect way
A lot of times when people break up, especially if it's an especially acrimonious divorce, it can shoot their credit rating to hell. Especially if there is squabbling over who is responsible for certain bills, or one person gets "taken to the cleaners" in the divorce settlement.

These days they check your credit rating not just for loans, but for things like job applications where I don't think it's really relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Singleterri Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
40. It isn't practical
With 50% of all marriages headed for divorce it just wouldn't work. Although I wouldn't want a divercee giving me marriage advice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. You don't think you could benefit from learning about someone
else's mistakes? Maybe someone who has been divorced is able to recognize what (if anything) they did wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
48. It would be kinda hard to do that, since most adults in the U.S. are
divorced, aren't they? Don't you have to be a minority to be discriminated against?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-05 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
53. Married people are a privileged class
One can be discriminated against for anything, including privilege.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC