Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Byrd kicking ass on CSPAN - is this a replay?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:35 PM
Original message
Byrd kicking ass on CSPAN - is this a replay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. From early this morning!
He did kick bootay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What's the occassion??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. looks like a small room - dunno who's there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Judicial Confirmation Process
http://inside.c-spanarchives.org:8080/cspan/cspan.csp?command=dprogram&record=543312468

Judicial Confirmation Process
Center for American Progress
Washington, District of Columbia (United States)
ID: 186438 - 04/25/2005 - 1:25 - $45.00

Byrd, Robert C., U.S. Senator, D-WV
Ornstein, Norman J., Resident Scholar, American Enterprise Institute
Gerhardt, Michael, Professor, College of William and Mary, Law
Podesta, John, President and CEO, Center for American Progress

Senator Byrd and others will speak about the role of the filibuster in protecting minority rights and providing a counterweight to presidential power. They will argue that invoking the "nuclear option" to eliminate Senate rules that require a supermajority vote to end debate on judicial nominees would impair the constitutional system of checks and balances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ironpost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. He who speaks the truth, kick bootay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Great! Go Byrd!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC