|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 05:38 PM Original message |
What if the Secret Service is telling the truth about Gannon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
1. If Bolton is as abusive and bad as they say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'm more concerned about the other salacious sex story at 1600 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 06:57 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. I wonder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
satya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
3. Or maybe the WH neocons aren't really worried about terrorism because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orwell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 06:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Bingo n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libertypirate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. What if Bush doesn't like bald heads, he just likes rubbing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
6. You might revisit Rawstory's documentation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 06:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I thought the SS job was to clear these people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 06:45 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. No. They're cops, they don't issue invitations. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 06:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. What was he doing there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 06:52 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I would think so. Why was this guy in our White House? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 07:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. What was he doing there and for whom was he doing it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 07:09 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. This isn't looking good for the Empire, is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dddem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 07:52 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 06:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
15. I don't know and that's an important question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
16. I don't think it was a matter of security...with them, there are insiders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 07:18 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. The only way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
17. It wasn't a security lapse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
19. compare his record and his access to the WH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 08:03 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. WHY don't they have a record of WHO G/G visited while in the WH? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 08:27 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. depends on whose Willy you're talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
20. dsc brought up the question of this presidency and that is, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
21. The real story is that a Male Prostitute for Hire was accepted by the SS.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dddem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 08:04 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. I suspect he had access in other places |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 10:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Yes...sadly he probably did and that's why it goes nowhere. But, if folks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brettdale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 10:30 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Life support needed for this story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
26. One wonders just which Busheviks Gannon was "pitching" to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brettdale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-05 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
29. wouldnt Moore or Stewart be getting invovled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 08:42 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC