Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I heard a good argument for the estate tax

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 04:50 PM
Original message
I heard a good argument for the estate tax
Edited on Sun Apr-24-05 04:55 PM by TheFarseer
Repubs are fond of calling it the death tax, but you are not paying a tax because you died. Your children are paying a tax because they received income i.e. the inheritance. The problem is that we tax some income at this rate and some at this other rate. What difference does it make if it's a paycheck, from a savings account, dividends or inheritance? It's all income. Just as their is a standard deduction for normal income, there should be a special deduction on inheritance(say 2 mil?) to keep family business together and extend that to everyone even if they don't have a business just to be fair. But at the end of the day it's just income and if they want to say "that's double taxation" so is sales tax, so is property tax, so is the gas tax, so are alot of things, so shut up and pay your taxes if you think this country is worth supporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Even the estate tax isn't a double tax.
Edited on Sun Apr-24-05 04:57 PM by Inland
Most estates, large one's anyway, consist of stocks, real estate, and other capital.

As you know, the appreciation on capital isn't paid until it is sold, ie, the "capital gains tax". No sale, no tax.

When a person dies, the appreciation is, under law, wiped out. There aren't any capital gains paid. It's the best deal in taxes.

So Bill Gates starts with shares of Microsoft worth, say, practically nothing. He dies with shares worth one billion. His estate sells them for one billion. He (or his estate)pays precisely ZERO capital gains taxes on the billion.

If the estate tax applies, it is the ONLY tax on the billion. Eliminate the estate tax, and Bill's heirs get ONE BILLION DOLLARS of income that NOBODY has paid ONE PENNY of tax on.

The Estate tax is a half assed attempt to recapture the huge giveaway to capital moving down a dynastic empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yes, exactly
did you see that this morning also? Can't even think of what I was watching now but that was another of the guy's points. I'm just so sick of rich people's money is untouchable and everything we do has to be for the good of the stock market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. The bigger point is that all money is taxed over and over again.
You pay a tax when you earn money and then when you spend it. Double taxation is a completely bogus concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. the money is unearned income.. pay the same i do if i won the Lotery 30%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Lotta income is not taxed at 30%
Thats just their withholding.

Lotta income is tax as regular income (which will admittedly be a high marginal rate)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. If I inherit income, I don't pay taxes on some amount of it. I
think it's about $250,000 now. So I can inherit that and not pay income taxes.

What the new laws do, in increase that amount. So if my parents have wealth and are wealthy, I can maintain that wealth. So income from wealth is less taxed than income. The person who starts a busincess and succeeds is taxed more than the person who inherits.

I know the arguments. In my area, homes are averaging $500,000. So you a child moves in to take care of a parent and when they die they can't keep the home. Same thing with a family farm. The children have to sell the farm to pay the taxes. A better way to handle those problems is to exempt the first million or so from taxes of a home left to a child or a farm left to a child. It is wrong to exempt all inherited wealth from taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Farms are EXEMPT from Estate Taxes!!!
"Selling the farm to pay the taxes" is right wing propaganda!!!
-- farms pass to heirs without paying inheritance taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. famers who are being honest with themselves know
who the real friend of the farmer is and it's sure as hell not the republicans. I could rant for hours on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Compare it to the lotteries - either state or genetic.
One way or another you win a boatload of money, but the Republicans only want the state lottery winners to pay taxes.

What Republicans are really about is taxing "work" and not taxing everything else. Does that not turn the whole thing on its head? People who make money by sitting around and doing nothing won't pay taxes and people who go to work everyday will. They are GREEDY, SELFISH and ELITIST. "Only little people pay taxes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Completely right, republicans don't value hard work
That's only a line of BS they spout to justify cutting programs that help the poor, disabled and other down-on-their-luck types. They value wealth, connections, how loud you can talk and well you can cheat. If one guy invests in Yahoo in 1995 and sells it to a 2nd guy in 1999 the first guy is rich and the 2nd guy is cleaned out. In no way, shape or form did the first guy "work harder" I don't begrudge rich people their wealth but they shouldn't begrudge paying the lions share of the taxes when they have the lions share of the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scruffy Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. Here's what happens with estate taxes . . .
Right now, each person gets an exclusion of $1.5m from federal estate taxes, NOT INCLUDING any amount you leave your spouse. If you have done your estate planning correctly, you and your spouse can EACH leave $1.5m of assets to other people and there will be no federal estate taxes due.

Also, right now, there is a "step-up" in basis, which means that if you have stock that you paid $10,000 for . . . if it is worth $50,000 at your death, no one pays income taxes on that $40,000 increase in value. Your heirs get to use the current value (the $50,000) as its new basis, and only pay income taxes if they sell the stock and get more than $50,000 for it.

If the current estate tax is repealed, it is expected that the step-up in basis will also be repealed, which means that your heirs would have to consider your original $10,000 cost as THEIR basis . .. and if they sold the stock at any time for $50,000, they would pay taxes on the $40,000 increase.

Repealing the estate tax AND repealing the step-up in basis will hurt ordinary people much more than the estate tax in its current form.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. #1 with spiriling out of control deficits you don't continue to cut taxes
#2, this tax cut benefits VERY few people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scruffy Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. The CUT itself benefits very few . ..
but the repeal of the step-up in basis will affect anyone with investments, including real estate. It will also make record-keeping and accounting a real nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's good for society
Countries that have no estate tax wind up with a useless cafe class of ultra-wealthy oligarchs. Who was it that was calling the elimination of the estate tax the "Paris Hilton tax cut"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. The whiny crybabies are probably pissed that the dearly departed
Edited on Sun Apr-24-05 07:28 PM by SoCalDem
had too many heirs.. Think about it.. Gramps starts a great business and it supports his entire family, sends all the kids to college.. They all grow up and have great careers, and now Gramps dies...Who of them will give up the career and run that business?? Maybe ONE person might want to, but then how do the others "get their share"?? Someone has to buy them out?? If it's a large business, who's got the cash laying around??

Usually the business, land, farm, home, whatever it is, MUST be sold so that the "division" can take place...

It's about the greed... All the heirs want their share,, they are not lamenting the loss of the business or farm.. They just do not want to pay taxes on the proceeds of the sale of the asset.

If Gramps had sold it when he was alive, HE would have had to pay capital gains taxes..no??

If a family asset continues in its original form, and employs people or produces something, I could see not taxing the heirs, but when it's dumped for the cash, they should pay taxes on the windfallo...just as if they won a lottery prize.. It IS a lottery win, in a sense.. The Gene Pool Lotto..


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC