Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds' weather information could go dark

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DustMolecule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 09:46 AM
Original message
Feds' weather information could go dark
<snip>
Do you want a seven-day weather forecast for your ZIP code? Or hour-by-hour predictions of the temperature, wind speed, humidity and chance of rain? Or weather data beamed to your cellphone?

That information is available for free from the National Weather Service.

But under a bill pending in the U.S. Senate, it might all disappear.

The bill, introduced last week by Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., would prohibit federal meteorologists from competing with companies such as AccuWeather and The Weather Channel, which offer their own forecasts through paid services and free ad-supported Web sites.
<snip>

More: http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/news/epaper/2005/04/21/m1a_wx_0421.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. That sounds like a bad, bad idea for everyone but the companies
that sell weather information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Santorum never fails to amaze
Everything he does pisses me off. What a gaper...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here's why..
President of AccuWeather is Dr. Joel N. Myers. Here's his political contributions....

Santorum is bought and paid for...

<http://www.newsmeat.com/fec/bystate_detail.php?st=PA&last=myers&first=joel>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. My 1st thought: "oh, I guess AccuWeather paid him off"
So now instead of Rick Santorum (R-Walmart), we can also use Rick Santorum (R-Accuweather)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DustMolecule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. This just makes me soooooooo mad
Someone posted yesterday about how stupid we all are to pay for things that we have gotten for free! Isn't providing weather data using satellites and such that the taxpayers have already paid for part of the 'service' that a government provides to its citizens?

From the article:

"I believe I've paid for that data once. ... I don't want to have to pay for it again," said Scott Bradner, a technical consultant at Harvard University.

He says that as he reads the bill, a vast amount of federal weather data would be forced offline.....

....A spokesman for Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., said the bill threatens to push the weather service back to a "pre-Internet era" — a questionable move in light of the four hurricanes that struck the state last year. Nelson serves on the Senate Commerce Committee, which has been assigned to consider the bill.

"The weather service proved so instrumental and popular and helpful in the wake of the hurricanes. How can you make an argument that we should pull it off the Net now?" said Nelson's spokesman, Dan McLaughlin. "What are you going to do, charge hurricane victims to go online, or give them a pop-up ad?"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC