Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Next Attack on the Courts: Cut Their Funding

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 06:04 AM
Original message
The Next Attack on the Courts: Cut Their Funding
Just in case they can't swing impeaching judges they don't like, the Pharisee Right is brewing up a Plan B :banghead:

From the LA Times:

2 Evangelicals Want to Strip Courts' Funds: Taped at a private conference, the leaders outline ways to punish jurists they oppose
By Peter Wallsten, Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON — Evangelical Christian leaders, who have been working closely with senior Republican lawmakers to place conservative judges in the federal courts, have also been exploring ways to punish sitting jurists and even entire courts viewed as hostile to their cause.
-----
Frist and DeLay have not publicly endorsed the evangelical groups' proposed actions. But the taped discussion among evangelical leaders provides a glimpse of the road map they are drafting as they work with congressional Republicans to achieve a judiciary that sides with them on abortion, same-sex marriage and other elements of their agenda.

"There's more than one way to skin a cat, and there's more than one way to take a black robe off the bench," said Tony Perkins, president of the conservative Family Research Council, according to an audiotape of a March 17 session. The tape was provided to The Times by the advocacy group Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

DeLay has spoken generally about one of the ideas the leaders discussed in greater detail: using legislative tactics to withhold money from courts. "We set up the courts. We can unset the courts. We have the power of the purse," DeLay said at an April 13 question-and-answer session with reporters.
-----more-----
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-strategy22apr22,1,799431.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. And I know evangelicals who would be appalled at what's going on.
Oh well.

The price of conformity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. This evangelical sure as hell is.
There they go again confusing the "E" word with konservative fundies. What college did these chimps go to anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. point of clarification, if you would . . . just what IS an evangelical?
I mean, what do those who refer to themselves a evangelicals actually mean by that term? . . . those who aren't extreme right wing fundies, that is . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Evangelical means a Protestant denomination
that derives its teachings from the Gospel. What the konservative fundies have done is take over the word, creating the implication that there are many more of them than there really are. With the help of a lazy media this happens all the time. There was a report a few years ago stating there were 70 million Evangelical Christians in this country. No one in the media is making the distinction between mainstream E's and the konservative fundies who make up a small subset of Chrisitanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Let me get this straight. Withhold funds to certain circuit courts whose
past rulings the religious wingnuts disagree with? Close the doors? Burn the dockets? Plaintiffs lose money, property, lives? Defendants sit in jail indefinitely without bail for unproven crimes? People are forced to do out-of-court settlements? Attorneys sit listless at their desks?

I don't think so . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. And this is a scary thought
Because this is something, they could legally do. As per the constitution they could just do away with the lower courts they don't like, so it does not surprise me they are contemplating this as a line of attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scooter24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Such a move
Edited on Fri Apr-22-05 07:24 AM by Scooter24
would be political suicide for the GOP. It's hard to fathom that there would be a majority of politicians, even Republicans, to go along with this proposed measure.

Stripping a court, then restacking it, then press controversial issues into the newly created courts. Could you imagine the implications if this was done each time there is a Senate majority and a President of the same political party?

I would love for a copy of this audio tape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Ask and ye shall receive...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scooter24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. You are awesome!
Thank you :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC