Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TRANSCRIPT of Clark on NPR re: NAFTA and the Economy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 11:31 PM
Original message
TRANSCRIPT of Clark on NPR re: NAFTA and the Economy
Source: WBUR Boston and NPR's "The Connection" on 9/8/2003, starting from approximately minute 28:15 through minute 32:00, available at:

http://www.theconnection.org/shows/2003/09/20030908_b_main.asp

DTH

--

NPR: General Clark, I want to ask you for a sort of point-by-point idea of positions on domestic issues but I can imagine people listening and thinking, gosh he sure knows his Balkans, and he knows Iraq, and he knows the military and these are all really important, but what the heck does he know about somebody who doesn't have a job?

GWC: Well first of all, I've got two brothers-in-law and a nephew who are unemployed, and we've never had any unemployment in my family. So I know it personally, and I know it conceptually. I studied economics of course at the graduate level at Oxford, I taught economics at West Point, I am in business, so I understand theory of the firm from being on a number of boards of directors and in this economy struggling, I was an investment banker, I passed my Series 62 exam last year to do M&A activities with an investment bank in Arkansas, which I subsequently left. So I've got some practical hands-on experience in the economy as well as having some academic background on it and look, I mean, this economy is in trouble right now. You're in a structural situation that we've not been in before, which is the export of jobs. And every business that I know of is busy outsourcing, and they're not outsourcing from the east coast to Arkansas, they're outsourcing to other countries. Poland, Bulgaria -- not Mexico, they're going beyond Mexico -- it's India and China. They're looking for the lowest cost, not only manufacturing, but in many cases I.T. services. And this is a problem that we're going to have to face. This is not going to be cured by the business cycle alone, so what we're going to have to do is we're going to have to have more programs, too, things like employment tax credits, we're going to have to do things that will help small firms, where the bulk of the employment is created in this country, we're going to have help small firms raise equity, because the collapse of the IPO markets and venture capital over the last three years have just knocked the legs out from under small start-up firms that are trying to raise the money they need to survive. So there are a number of measures here.

NPR: We talk a fair amount about this on the program, we in fact did a series on it last week and listened to a lot of people raising serious questions about free trade, people who are perhaps in the textile industry in North Carolina saying, "Free trade has decimated our town, our county." I mean are you willing to wind things back far enough to say, "If free trade's not working, maybe we should take a second look at it?"

GWC: Well I think you've got to have FAIR trade, not free trade. So I think the first thing you've got to have is you've got to make sure that when you're willing to open up your markets that you're helping workers in other countries achieve the kind of labor and environmental benefits that people in this country achieve. You've got to have a program to do it and you've got to move systematically. We knew with NAFTA that there would be adjustments required, but in my experience we haven't funded and operated those adjustment mechanisms in the right way to protect textile workers on the East Coast and the Carolinas, or the garment workers that are manufacturing clothing let's say in Mississippi, and I've talked to a lot of people whose parents, whose mothers were there as seamstresses, in places, and lost their jobs and there is no other job. So we've got to really pay attention to the transformation of the economy when we -- free trade is not "free" in terms of its benefit to the economy. There's always the assumption that well, you're going to get comparative advantage, you're going to lower the cost, that's in everybody's net benefit. It is, in the long-term, but you've got to have the right kind of support structure in place for the individual human beings who are affected by the transformation so they can find other meaningful work. You know, this country has a law in place, it's called the Full Employment Act of 1946: it's the DUTY of the country to maintain full employment in this country. It's not a luxury, it's a duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you for this post
Another piece of the puzzle for me. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. That's Why I Posted It
So that people could see for themselves how great Clark is! :-)

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalash477 Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. thanks
another reason to vote for Clark--he knows his economics. we need a person in the white house who actually understands economies. Not a guy who just panders to unions or big buisness or some fat cats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I Agree, Clark Is Very Knowledgeable on Economics
I think that scholastically, he has the strongest credentials in the field.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. I heard on NPR this morning that he TAUGHT economics at West
Point. A Rhodes scholar, an economics professor, they can not touch him on the patriotism issue, I think we have a winner!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-03 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Indeed
People are blinded by his stars. He is also a very well-qualified candidate on the economy.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Hi kalash477!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fabius Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds pretty good to me.
Actually sounds a lot like Dean if you really listen to what's said and don't just use the Lieberman attack soundbites.

I'm thinking Clark will be one of our strongest candidates. I think the strongest candidates will continue to talk FAIR trade not just "free" trade and jobs. That alone could blow out Bush.

Clark: "You know, this country has a law in place, it's called the Full Employment Act of 1946: it's the DUTY of the country to maintain full employment in this country. It's not a luxury, it's a duty."

That's actuall a revolutionary statement, I didn't know that law existed!!!!
:)

I like this guy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. He gets it.
He's not a blind fool believer in the "invisible hand of capitalism" voodoo hocus pocus that Repigs spew to cover their tracks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. Cool! Dean = Clark on fair-trade
These two would make a great ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aneerkoinos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. Positive signs yes
But both Dean and Clark need whole lotta more educating on what fair trade really means: solving the debt problem of developing countries, installing currency exchange tax (Tobin tax), giving up agricultural subsidies that hurt farmers in the developing countries, making WTO more democratic, disbanding IMF and WB and replacing them with more democratic institutions, renouncing the orthodox economic theory alltogether, global democracy etc.

It's up to you, my American friends, to educate your candidates. Now is the time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. you are right
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronzo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yes sir,
I'll kick it up, I'm staying up early to catch the first word.

http://www.draftclark2004.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronzo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. World Class! thanks for the link.
30 minutes until the 'early bird' web cast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imhotep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. He sounds like Clinton
lots of words without a real answer to the question.
Weasel Clark just restates the problem, yeah we know what needs to be done so tell us the solution not politician crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. How much detail can you go into in a short interview?
This is a complex issue.

He stated "but in my experience we haven't funded and operated those adjustment mechanisms in the right way to protect textile workers on the East Coast and the Carolinas, or the garment workers that are manufacturing clothing let's say in Mississippi."

I'm sure a discussion of this statement alone would take quite some time.

With that said, I'd like to see him in a televised town hall meeting where he did this topic in detail so we could make a more fair assessment on how well he understands the issue and whether he has an idea of how resolve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
13. Excellent--he knows his policy
He has got this downpat. Fair trade, tax credits to prevent outsourcing, full employment act, increased SBA loans--this is good stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
14. BUt, he's a general! He is a one trick pony!
Just anticipating further comments--But, but, Clark doesn't have any experience with anything besides military stuff!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. So-so, Wesley
Let's see, he says "fair trade" so that puts him in the same place as Dean - I think even Lieberman is for "fair trade" isn't he? He admits outsourcing is a structural problem, good. But his solution is "more programs, too, things like employment tax credits, we're going to have to do things that will help small firms" - so he wants to cut taxes on business. So do Republicans. Everyone wants to cut taxes on "small business" - and what are these programs? Corporate welfare?

Very good he mentions the Full Employment Act of 1946 though. If the Clark campaign starts posting this interview everytimg someone questions his policies, what's the difference from the Dean campaign, where they post his *one* interview where he talks about fair trade, labor and environmental standards?

Okay, so Clark is better than a Republican, but he sounds like yet another neo-liberal here, and that was hardly a stinging indictment of NAFTA. Can we get some leadership from someone here? Is Kucinich really our only hope? Hello?

Clark will NEVER win the primary with wishy-washy crap like this. I hope he's about to give his big speech about corporate loyalty soon. Perhaps he'll take some leadership on the massive corporate welfare in the Pentagon budget?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
16. Where did you get the transcript DTH?
Edited on Wed Sep-17-03 08:02 AM by Clark Can WIN
I started typing one out myself and decided my typing skills are greatly reduced from 20 years ago or so.

do you have a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. I Typed It Myself
Took about 45 minutes, but I felt it was important. I feel pretty good about it, since parts of my transcription may actually end up in the FAQ. :-)

www.meetclark.com/faq

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
18. He's saying all the right things while not really saying anything...
Which is, sadly, what I have come to expect from anyone entering the political sphere these days.

He talks about "stopgap" measures such as unemployment tax credits and such, but all of this was debated with regards to NAFTA and Fast Track Trade Promotion Authority -- and, in fact, has done relatively nothing to help the plight of people directly affected by the flight of their industries to other countries.

He also fails to address issues like liberalization of financial markets (something that has proven DEVASTATING to developing economies) or HOW we might help developing nations achieve improvement in labor and environmental standards. Also missing is any mention of the crushing debt under which developing nations try to exist, along with the austerity measures implemented at the bidding of the IMF and World Bank.

One of the things I see as a problem is not that business is given too little freedom in the current system, but rather that it is given too much. While small businesses should have a climate in which they can flourish, transnational businesses should be penalized for any violation of basic environmental standards or human rights. In this case, he's making the wrong emphasis of how to stimulate the economy -- possibly having something to do with his time spent in ventures such as theoretical economics and investment banking, and being too far removed from the plight of the average person who is living in extreme uncertainty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I was expecting more too
Clark sounds just like Dean here. This is the same song and dance about NAFTA and "free trade" that the Democrats have given us for 12 years now. Maybe he'll say something of substance on the issue soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. He's acknowledging the points that the protestors have pushed
In that respect, he's no different than many politicians out there. But it's not encouraging with him -- it gives the impression that he will have to be pushed on this issue, rather than having the political courage to act boldly to make trade truly fair.

I guess only time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC