Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Help please: Did the Raygun Administration stop Congress from....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Blue_Chill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 11:00 PM
Original message
Help please: Did the Raygun Administration stop Congress from....
Edited on Tue Sep-16-03 11:01 PM by Blue_Chill
passing a resolution condemning Saddam Hussein's use of WMD's back in the 80's? I just heard this on TV I want to know the details and possibly a link showing this.

Any info is appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LuCifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not to my knowledge
I've never heard of such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Chill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Condi Rice agreed that it happened on Nightline just now
If this is true then why hasn't anyone brought this up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuCifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hmm
I don't wanna go out on a limb here, but...could she be, uh, LYING!

Hell, Rummypoo now says what ANYONE with a BRAIN already KNEW: 9/11 AND IRAQ HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER! Godsakes, that man has LOST IT.

www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-3155404,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-03 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. It was called the "Prevention of Genocide Act", in 1988
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Prevention+of+Genocide+Act%22

http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/kurds/battle.html

(snip)

The Bill was called the Prevention of Genocide Act (download the Act). It would have imposed the harshest American economic sanctions against any country in twenty years. But Galbraith had to move quickly because Congress was about to adjourn and if he didn't get Senate and House Approval the Bill would die.

The sanctions bill won Senate approval in just 24 hours.

(snip)

President Ronald Reagan thought that Saddam would respond better to a carrot than a stick. He was prepared to use his presidential veto to kill the Bill. The House and the Senate haggled over it until Congress adjourned and the Prevention of Genocide Act disappeared.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm guessing that Blue_Chill has me on ignore. Could someone copy-paste
post #4 into a new post in this thread so that he'll see the answer to his question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'd do it
but he has me on ignore too :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Chill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. No I can still read your posts
I just try to read them before lunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. cool
making you ill is a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. why, don't you think it is possible to ignore you..........
without actualy putting you "on ignore"?

I am sure that BC would hate to miss the time you actually said something to him worth responding to.

Your endless baiting is a bore kiddo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Chill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. You are not on ignore!
I was asleep when you posted that. jeez!

Anyways thanks for filling me in on that. I had never heard of it before. You da man wonk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Isome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wonk thinks you have him on ignore...
But he wanted you to have this information and asked someone to cut & paste it for him. *Hello Wonk!*

Here is what he posted for you:


http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Prevention+of+Genocide+Act%22

http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/kurds/battle.html

(snip)

The Bill was called the Prevention of Genocide Act (download the Act). It would have imposed the harshest American economic sanctions against any country in twenty years. But Galbraith had to move quickly because Congress was about to adjourn and if he didn't get Senate and House Approval the Bill would die.

The sanctions bill won Senate approval in just 24 hours.

(snip)

President Ronald Reagan thought that Saddam would respond better to a carrot than a stick. He was prepared to use his presidential veto to kill the Bill. The House and the Senate haggled over it until Congress adjourned and the Prevention of Genocide Act disappeared.

more...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Also, House in '85 tried to put Iraq on State terrorism sponsorship list.


Shultz got them to drop it.



U.S. Diplomatic and Commercial Relationships with Iraq, 1980 - 2 August 1990
Prepared by Nathaniel Hurd.
15 July 2000 (updated 12 December 2001 by Nathaniel Hurd and Glen Rangwala).


1984
According to the Washington Post, the CIA began in 1984 secretly to give Iraq intelligence that Iraq uses to "calibrate" its mustard gas attacks on Iranian troops. In August, the CIA establishes a direct Washington-Baghdad intelligence link, and for 18 months, starting in early 1985, the CIA provided Iraq with "data from sensitive U.S. satellite reconnaissance photography...to assist Iraqi bombing raids." The Post’s source said that this data was essential to Iraq’s war effort.<17> The United States re-established full diplomatic ties with Iraq on 26 November,<18> just over a year after Iraq’s first well-publicized CW use and only 8 months after the UN and U.S. reported that Iraq used CWs on Iranian troops.

1985
In 1985 the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill to put Iraq back on the State terrorism sponsorship list.<19> After the bill’s passage, Shultz wrote to the bill’s sponsor, Rep. Howard Berman, cited the U.S.’ "diplomatic dialogue on this and other sensitive issues, " claimed that "Iraq has effectively distanced itself from international terrorism," and stated that if the U.S. found that Iraq supports groups practicing terrorism "we would promptly return Iraq to the list."<20> Rep. Berman dropped the bill and explicitly cited Shultz’s assurances.<21>


1986
The Defense Department’s (DOD) Under Secretary for Trade Security Policy, Stephen Bryen, informed the Commerce Department’s (CD) Assistant Secretary for Trade Administration in November that intelligence linked the Saad 16 research center with ballistic missile development.<23> Between 1985 and 1990, CD approved many computer sales to Iraq that go directly to Saad 16. CD approved over $1 million worth of computer equipment for sale to Saad 16 after Commerce received the above-mentioned November letter from DOD.<24> As of 1991 Saad 16 reportedly contained up to 40% U.S.-origin equipment.<25>

1988

The CD approved exports in January and February to Iraq’s SCUD missile program’s procurement agency. These exports allowed Iraq to extend SCUD range far enough to hit allied soldiers in Saudi Arabia and Israeli civilians in Tel Aviv and Haifa.<26> On 23 March, London’s Financial Times and several other news organizations reported from Halabja, located in Iraqi Kurdistan, that several days prior Iraq used CWs on Halabja’s Kurds.<27>



Note: This link also inlcludes 1988's Prevention of Genocide Act


more.....

http://www.cam.ac.uk/societies/casi/info/usdocs/usiraq80s90s.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. I remember when all this happened, I barely remembered the details however
so thanks for posting this information. I have book marked it for non DU arguments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Chill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Thanks
lol this thread is too funny. Everyone claiming I have them on ignore.

Here is my ignore list.







And that folks is my ignore list. get it? good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ignatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Reagan WH blocked the bill and in fact, the US continued to
provide Iraq with money and arms AFTER the gassing of the kurds. In 1989 George HW Bush signed a top-secret directive ordering closer ties with Baghdad and opening the way for $1 Billion in new aid to Hussein.


http://www.mahablog.com/2003.09.14_arch.html

Scroll down to articl dtd. 9-15-03, titled Bring Out Your Dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
17. This all happened the same time Reagan sent Rumsfeld to Iraq...
...for his little get together with Saddam. (anyone have the photo handy?) Rather than trying to stop Saddam, the Reagan/Bush administration were trying to improve relations with him. The Reagan/Bush administration were Saddams bestest of friends (Osama bin Laden was too, but that is another story) while the Kurds were being gassed. Both Iraq and Iran were using poison gas at the time. And there was also questions as to whos gas actually killed the Kurds. Iraqs, or Irans?

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. You know Don I often wonder if Rummy, who was president of Searle ,
a chemical company, back then was actually profiting from sales to the Iraquis. That certainly is their MO, but I have google searched before and could find nothing about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Here tis
Edited on Wed Sep-17-03 11:14 AM by alfredo
http://www.defenselink.mil/specials/secdef_histories/bios/rumsfeld.htm

I think it would be interesting to see if there was a golden handshake after his term is over.

Edited for the statement. was too quick with the mouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Thanks for that link. He definitely was at Searle when
he was sent to Iraq,and the famous handshake, took place. But I think the real goods on the guy would be if their was proof that Searle sold chemicals, ie, weapons of mass destruction to Husseing which would have directly profited Rummy. Maybe it did not happen,I think a good investigative reporter could find something there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Here are some links to get you started
http://cleveland.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=3547

<snip>The US government's Center for Disease Control sent shipments of germs to the Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission and other agencies of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. In 1986, it sent botulinum toxin and botulinum toxoid directly to the Iraqi chemical and biological weapons complex at al-Muthanna. Another example would be current Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on December 20, 1983 when he was Reagan's special envoy and president of bio/chem company GD Searle sold CIA engineered. He personally shook hands with Hussein to seal a deal that gave Hussein the very weapons the US government says he should not have. Thus criticizing Hussein for having this is a reflection of our government's use of hypocrisy to further its own political agenda.

Engaging in war for possession of such weapons is also arbitrary. According to the Pentagon, 12 nations have nuclear weapons programs, 13 nations possess biological weapons, 16 nations have chemical weapons, and 28 nations are armed with ballistic missiles. Possession of weapons has never been a real reason for war; it is applied arbitrarily to drum up emotional support when it is convenient for our government to use.

As for seeking nuclear weapons, that is questionable. Bush stated in a speech that he had acquired evidence that Hussein was trading for nuclear material from African nations. This evidence was given to the UN to help its inspections program. In March of 2003, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) showed the documents to be blatant forgeries. Furthermore, the IAEA director and UN weapons inspector Mohamed El Baradei stated to the UN Security Council on March 7, 2003, that there is no evidence that Iraq has a nuclear weapons program. As for the forged documents, that shows the US intelligence gathering on Iraq is either incompetent or intentionally sabotaged to gain false support for the war, much like the US government lied to gain support for invading Vietnam or Kuwait lied to Congress to gain support for the US invading Iraq in the last incursion against Iraq.

http://www.squidart.com/iraq_facts.htm

<snip>Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is the former head of G.D. Searle (now part of Pharmacia and Monsanto), a pharmaceutical company whose products include, among others, bioweapons components and anthrax vaccines.

In his January, 2003 State of the Union Address, Bush asked Congress for "$6 billion to quickly make available effective vaccines and treatments against agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, Ebola, and plague. We must assume that our enemies would use these diseases as weapons, and we must act before the dangers are upon us."


http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030128-19.html

(See above, where Reagan and Bush, Sr.’s administration authorized the sale of “poisonous chemicals and deadly biological viruses, such as anthrax and bubonic plague” to Iraq in the 80’s, sales facilitated by Donald Rumsfeld, then Special Envoy to Iraq.) -----

Rumsfeld was the head of G.D. Searle & Co. when he met with Saddam Hussein in the 80’s, as a Presidential Envoy to Iraq. During that time Rumsfeld was also working to secure a billion dollar pipeline scheme for the Bechtel Corporation in Iraq, which Hussein ultimately turned down because the deal was not favorable to Iraq. The Bush/Cheney administration now eyes Bechtel as a primary contractor for the rebuilding of Iraq's infrastructure. http://www.seen.org/pages/reports/crude.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
21. Thanks for bringing this up....this is one of the reasons
Edited on Wed Sep-17-03 11:40 AM by blm
that Dems were ALWAYS against Saddam and wanted him gone way back to the 80s.

Poppy Bush kept supplying Saddam behind congress's back. (Iraqgate)

Poppy set Saddam up with bio and chemical weapons and BILLIONS of our tax dollars. The Dems had good reason to believe Saddam still had those materials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC