Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Niger Uranium Documents Forged In U.S., Says Fomer Counterterrorism Chief

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 09:05 AM
Original message
Niger Uranium Documents Forged In U.S., Says Fomer Counterterrorism Chief
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/21704/
From Alternet: A former counterterrorism chief claims that the now discredited documents that showed Iraq trying to purchase uranium were fabricated right here in the United States.

Who Forged the Niger Documents?
By Ian Masters, AlterNet
Posted on April 7, 2005, Printed on April 8, 2005
http://www.alternet.org/story/21704/

Editor’s Note: This is an edited transcript of an interview conducted by Ian Masters with Vincent Cannistaro, the former CIA head of counterterrorism operations and intelligence director at the National Security Council under Ronald Reagan, which aired on the Los Angeles public radio KPFK on April 3, 2005.

- snip -

VINCENT CANNISTARO: The documents were fabricated by supporters of the policy in the United States. The policy being that you had to invade Iraq in order to get rid of Saddam Hussein, and you had to do it soon to avoid the catastrophe that would be produced by Saddam Hussein’s use of alleged weapons of mass destruction.

IAN MASTERS: Well, Ambassador Wilson publicly refuted the claims — particularly the 16 words in the President’s State of the Union address that the Iraqis were trying to buy significant quantities of uranium from Niger. That document, I understand, was fabricated ... it originally came out of Italian intelligence, I think SISME, or SISDE—I’m not sure which one.

It was SISME, yeah. ...

uring the two-thousands when we’re talking about acquiring information on Iraq. It isn’t that anyone had a good source on Iraq—there weren’t any good sources. The Italian intelligence service, the military intelligence service, was acquiring information that was really being hand-fed to them by very dubious sources. The Niger documents, for example, which apparently were produced in the United States, yet were funneled through the Italians.

Do we know who produced those documents? Because there’s some suspicion ...

I think I do, but I’d rather not speak about it right now, because I don’t think it’s a proven case ...

If I said “Michael Ledeen” ?

You’d be very close . . .

- snip -

MUCH MORE AT LINK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Whoa!
Was Ledeen at OSP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Ledeen's involvement was discussed here last summer
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=2128960

This was a long juicy thread on the Italian role in the dissemination of the forged documents that went extensively into Ledeen's connections with Italian military intelligence and his neo-fascist philosophy. It's well worth revisiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Funny how so many forged documents
come from the US and particularly Repukes - mmmm forged Niger documents, forged AWOL documents, forged Terry Schiavo memo

do they have a little forged document machine hidden somewhere on capitol hill?

how disgusting - and what kind of coverage will the MSM give this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. This interview was on April 3rd, and haven't heard much since then, so...
probably not much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. MSM reporters know of Langley Studios & CIA forgery factory - and never
say anything.

A CIA familiar person, saying that certain items are obviously coming out of Langley, will be countered by the fact that the CIA "will not confirm" and indeed the CIA will arrange interviews with civilian and foreign experts that will suggest that at the least it is "not proven" - and that to discuss a not proven item would be Un-American.

Overseas media will report on the controversy.

US media - a free press not controlled by the Right Wing GOP, they just act that way - will bury such stories. The children of the "bravest greatest generation" are not all that brave when it comes to losing part of the next pay increase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ironpost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Yea, they have a forged document machine
better known as karl "slime ball" rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. So many from Texas. Is this what Bush does on all his vacations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. cheney had his own govt set up, sto keep bush seperate
cheney created the documentation he needed to give to george to go to war. powell and tenet says, oh ok this is why we need to go to war

cheney created the documents he wanted.

we know all this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. Michael Ledeen ... pushing bush for more war ...
Edited on Fri Apr-08-05 10:10 AM by welshTerrier2
check out the article below written by Ledeen last month ... this guy does not believe in diplomacy ... he does not believe in "deep thinking" on foreign policy ... and he believes that the "ends justify the means" (i.e. it doesn't matter how you act in the world; it only matters if you "win") ... with views like that, it's not at all hard to believe that he forged the Niger document ... the guy helped push us into a war that's cost more than a hundred thousand lives, hundreds of billions of dollars, and the loss of US prestige and credibility ... he lied; soldiers died ... he was just doing "whatever was necessary" to justify invading Iraq ... and now he's pushing for military action in Iran, Syria and Lebanon ...

source: http://www.nationalreview.com/ledeen/ledeen200503170753.asp

All that may well be true, but even so, it (i.e. diplomacy) is the wrong thing to do. First of all, it enables the terrorists and their masters to buy time, and this is a moment of enormous risk for them. Every day they remain in power encourages them, and discourages the forces of freedom in their countries. When the people of Shiraz ask President Bush "why don’t you act?" they are reflecting this reality. Carpe Diem, Mister President.

But above all, the clever stratagem adopted by the administration ignores Machiavelli’s greatest lesson: Leadership is all about winning and losing, not about elegance and deep thinking. If we win the Europeans and lose the Middle East, we will have lost. But if we win the Middle East, the Europeans will hail us, as we see from their grudging tributes to Bush’s successful liberation of Afghanistan and Iraq. "If you are victorious," Machiavelli says in his uncompromising way, "people will always judge the means you used to have been appropriate."

Syria and Iran are tottering, and if they fall, the terror network will break into relatively impotent shards that we will be able to destroy. Forget about diplomacy, this is war. Every day we hear about plans to attack the United States directly, and every day more Americans die in Iraq. Is it not too clever by half to resort to cunning diplomacy at such a time? Is it not immoral to leave American fighting men and women in harm’s way an hour longer than is absolutely necessary?

The fires of freedom are burning all over Iran, Syria, and Lebanon. Don't stand back and admire the flames. Push the dictators in, and then cheer as free societies emerge.

Faster, confound it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. my favorite psycho neocon quote is Ledeen's
This little gem came in Apr 2002, just a few months before Rove rolled out the product...

http://www.nationalreview.com/goldberg/goldberg042302.asp

WHY IRAQ?

So how does all this, or the humble attempt at a history lesson of my last column, justify tearing down the Baghdad regime? Well, I've long been an admirer of, if not a full-fledged subscriber to, what I call the "Ledeen Doctrine." I'm not sure my friend Michael Ledeen will thank me for ascribing authorship to him and he may have only been semi-serious when he crafted it, but here is the bedrock tenet of the Ledeen Doctrine in more or less his own words: "Every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business." That's at least how I remember Michael phrasing it at a speech at the American Enterprise Institute about a decade ago (Ledeen is one of the most entertaining public speakers I've ever heard, by the way).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. BIG KICK
KICK

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. hey !!! someone nominate this thread please ...
this could be the smoking gun we've been waiting for ... bush and his little commission have convinced Americans he was given bad intelligence by the CIA ... the truth is, he was indeed given bad intelligence ... but it was done on purpose ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The Intell to convince Congress and the Amerikan people was
demanded by shrub and it was provided by The Office of Special Plans. Powell delivered the manure to the UN and the Bush Junta lied and lied to the World about Iraq. Do most of the Amerikan people care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. kick: Moderators, please combine with thread that is on front page
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
16. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
18. So where's the useless LA Times? Not interested in treason?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC