A professional victim, maybe. This isn't a case of media bias, this a con woman who went a step too far:
http://www.10tv.com/Global/story.asp?S=3187218Ayala has a history of filing lawsuits - including a claim against another fast-food restaurant.
Ayala, 39, who hired a San Jose, Calif., attorney to represent her in the Wendy's case, has been involved in at least half a dozen legal battles in the San Francisco Bay area, according to court records.
She brought a suit against an ex-boss in 1998 for sexual harassment and sued an auto dealership in 2000, alleging the wheel fell off her car. That suit was dismissed after Ayala fired her lawyer, who said she had threatened him.The early news reports that the finger was an aunt's have subsequently been discredited--turns out that was the rumor mill working. You have to wonder which one of her friends who no doubt knows her best passed that on to the media.
But, sorry--a woman who threatens HER OWN LAWYER, who has brought six or more lawsuits, seemingly as sport, has her own "burden of proof" issues, legalities aside. If it quacks like a duck...
I'm as much for justice as the next person, but the damage done to Wendy's as a result of this accusation is enormous, far reaching, and approaches the TYLENOL tampering case many years ago. If it were Fred's Bait Shop, where Fred makes 20K a year, who was accused unfairly and suffered great loss, everyone would leap to the aid of the little guy. I've never heard tell of Wendy's treating their employees like shit, and their menu appears at least slightly healthier with more variety than the average burger joint...not that I know, I don't go to those places much. In any event, even if they served cholesterol on a platter, if they've done nothing wrong, and this woman has screwed them over, they'll never be able to extract anything approaching retribution. The best hope they have is to spin it into a commercial for fish or chicken fingers...