Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I was unfamiliar with the use of the term "Papist" in the English language

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:40 PM
Original message
I was unfamiliar with the use of the term "Papist" in the English language
And for that I am truly, truly sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are you sorry that you were unfamiliar with it or sorry that you are
now familiar with it?

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Knowledge is never something to be sorry about.
</highfallutingrandstanding>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jilly Beans Donating Member (334 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. Is using the word "Papist" to describe Catholics akin to using the...
term "Fundie" to talk about evangelists?

Wonder if threads about "Fundies" will be locked, too, since "Fundie" is also a smear?

I'm just asking. I've been guilty of using the word "Fundie" myself.

Just wondering if the "no religious smear" rule is going to be equally applied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. No. "Fundie" is a stupid word....
Cloyingly cute & imprecise. Some Fundamentalists have no interest in politics & are NOT the enemy. I don't use it myself.

But it doesn't have the history of "Papist." For those lacking in literary or historical education, the internet has several lists of ethnic slurs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jilly Beans Donating Member (334 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Funny...
because I'm a PhD in history. Never have heard that the term Papist is offensive...of course, I've never used it.

But my sensitivity to slurs was heightened during my education, especially because my focus is American Indians, and there are plenty of slurs there.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. Papist was once akin to using the "n-word"
And those of us with older relatives still very much dislike it. My grandfather remembers being called that, and being beaten up and fired from jobs because of it. It was a very anti-Irish and anti-Catholic word. I myself (when I was still RC) have been called an idol worshiper, not a Christian, worshiper of the Antichrist, etc. after I moved to NC in 1982.

I also have a degree in history, and have read about the slur being used in many places. The Klan and John Birchers especially loved it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jilly Beans Donating Member (334 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Please see my response to Skinner.
I always appreciate the opportunity to be enlightened at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #33
70. I'm Catholic.
I've used Papist quite a few times, and I never considered it an insult. That is, until I moved to the UK. I was called a "Papist" in quite the same tone of voice that people would use for minority slurs here in the US. It didn't happen all that often, but it did happen a few times in the two years that I lived there. It was disconcerting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Ah, yes, the old "equally applied" argument.
I guess we can't forbid the term "Papist" because a lot of people use the term "Fundie." By this logic, we basically have to permit *all* slurs.

"Papist" is a term that gets used at Klan rallies and Bob Jones University. Let's not try to pretend that this is PC gone awry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jilly Beans Donating Member (334 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. I'm not pretending that.
I appreciate the opportunity to be educated at DU. I've never used the term "papist" and I've used the term "fundie" many, many times at DU.

And, under my name Maddy McCall, I've often been a vocal critic of people who have complained of "PC gone awry" at DU. Check my Maddy McCall post history in the Lounge. I started a topic on this.

(I've been on the road, Skinner, where I can't retrieve my password for my Maddy McCall account. That's why I'm using "Jilly Beans" while I'm gone.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #32
73. And what of the term "Islamist"?
This is getting interesting . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
53. I have no idea but I will continue to use the term "Fundie" because it
IS what they are, FUNDAMENTALISTS! I also have never considered Fundie directed at evangeliCALS, they can overlap but "Fundie" stands alone as a descriptor to me anyways. If by evangeliSTS you mean TELevangeliSTS then it probably fits more than it's fair share of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
60. fundie is not a slur, they call themselves fundamentalist
they are not embarrassed by the word fundamentalist. they are proud of this word and define themselves as fundamentalist. fundies is just shortened from fundamentalist. it is not a slur at all. it is who they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have never actually heard it used in conversation. Here is the
Edited on Thu Apr-07-05 01:45 PM by BrklynLiberal
definition I found. IT IS an offensive term.
Papist is a derisive term meaning "Roman Catholic". It was used during the English Reformation to indicate one who believed in Papal supremacy over the Anglican Church. Over time, as the political nature of the struggle between Protestants and Catholics became heated, it became a pejorative for Roman Catholics. The word ultimately derives from Latin papa, meaning "Pope". "Popish" is an adjective for Roman Catholic used much in the same vein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. ummm
i never, EVER heard that term used in a bad way. but thats just me..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. must be you, I've never heard of it used in a good way
kinda like "nigra" it is a slur, there is no other use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
50. I have
But I've also heard it in a wry way, much as that ubiquitous N word is used amongst the community it purports to label, to take the power from it.

It's not a nice word, it has 'associations' with people who tried to keep their boot on the neck of the potato eatin' folk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. Link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papism

<snip>

"While considered offensive in contemporary speech, it was a word in ordinary use until the mid-nineteenth century; it occurs frequently in Macaulay's History of England from the Accession of James II, and in other historical or controversial works from that period. It is also a legal term that defines ineligibility for the throne under the current law of the United Kingdom. Under the Act of Settlement enacted in 1701, no "Papist", nor anyone who marries a "Papist", may succeed to the throne of the United Kingdom.

The word is used by some extremist politicians in the UK, such as Ian Paisley."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. The term used to be tossed at the Irish like rotten tomatoes!
It was usually preceded by "bloody."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yep-and we're from MA so our ancestors heard it plenty!
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. i never use the word but I didn't know it was a slur either. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
47. Certainly, that, and NINA
AS in: Wanted, female, housekeeper, six days a week. NINA.

Wanted: Female, cook, seven days a week. NINA.

Wanted: Male, Liveryman, six days a week and holidays. NINA.

You see those sorts of ads in the old newspapers all the time. Who, or what, was NINA? No Irish Need Apply.

Fecking bastards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It gets the point across
but is demeaning and archaic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. It has bad connotations-particularly to Irish Catholics
that's what the Orangemen call Catholics in Northern Ireland.

But in your defense, some folks jump on every little nuance that could be construed as critical of Catholicism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formerrepuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Also: "Popery" or "Romish"...antiquated derogatory slang for Catholic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Calico Jack Rackham Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yeah I just found out I'm a bigot.
After 17 years of Catholic education I had this stunning epiphany that I hate everything and everyone Catholic(Means I can't talk to my Best friend anymore). This is my cue to take a few months off from DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Have you ever heard a Catholic refer to himself that way?
That should tell you something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Calico Jack Rackham Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Look I'm not going to be chastized by you
or anyone else so don't attempt to talk down to me. I posted something, people took offense to it, and the mods warned me end of story! If I honestly offended anyone I apologize; however, people like you are just trying to get in you last digs so kindly desist.

Oh and to answer your question yes. I have heard Catholics refer to more extreme members of their congregation as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happynewyear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. too bad you HATE Catholics
Yeah time for a time out huh?

Jesus! :grr:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Please do take some time off.
:bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. There will be many a dry eye.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
44. YOU! Thanks for nothing, pal. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. I was amazed that it was still being used....
Ignorance of the meaning of an almost-obsolete word is no big thing.

It mostly shows up in histories of the British Civil War--used by the Puritans. And histories of the xenophobic Know Nothings of the 19th century. Nowadays, its usage is confined to certain areas of Northern Ireland.

But it has always been a term of extreme hostility to Catholics. More recently, to Irish Catholics.

When someone is informed that a term is rude & decides to stop using it--they are being polite! Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. Ian Paisley uses it all the time...
if that helps anyone understand what kind of people use the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Princess Turandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
39. Well, if someone wants to keep company with a cast of notables..
such as Ian Paisley, Bob Jones I and Mel Gibson's nut-job father, I guess they could use the word. (This is not a comment on the OP at all.)

Personally, I prefer being referred to as an 'idol worshiper' lol.
Since I don't read anti-Catholic websites, I've never seen/heard someone actually refer to a Catholic as one except for here on DU, although those comments are few and far between.(I'm referring to the comment coming from posters who appear to be Protestants.)

I must go now and brush my idols, since mine have fur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
43. I've heard it used in NC
When I was at a WEDDING of all places, in a sermon. I am NOT slurring Southerners. I've lived in NC and VA since 1982. I'm just saying I don't think it is an antiquated word. I've read it in recent Klan literature, too. (they tuck it under people's windshields in my parents neighborhood)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think there is a huge difference
between having issues with the Catholic church and having issues with someone because they are Catholic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. I am almost 36...
...and I had never heard that term. I didn't know it was a term until I was reading another thread. Just goes to show, you are never too old to learn. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Me either.
I learned something new today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillowTree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. Term used as a perjorative in reference to Catholics.
And the fact that you'd not heard it until now indicates that you've been hanging with a nice class of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Well outside of Ireland, it's really not used anymore
Watch "Gangs of New York" to get a feel for the way "Natives" viewed the Irish Catholics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. I've only heard it used by Catholics
I've always assumed it was a specific Catholic organization or group, along the lines of Opus Dei (even if not RW like the ODers). There are always many subgroups within each sect of Christianity or any other religion, after all.

I've never heard it used as an insult, but I'll take the word of Catholic DUers and treat it as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. In this country, I've only heard it used by Klansmen.
In other countries, the standards of acceptable use of language are different. It all depends on the speaker and the context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Well, David Duke was from LA
But the Cajuns I know who've used such a term would *never* have supported him or his policies. So I don't know- maybe it's use and/or meaning varies somewhat by region?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
24. The Oxford English Dictionary says
it's Chiefly derogatory, but not always. And the OED is the Bible of the English Language.

Besides, it can be used to refer to people, believe it or not, who are fans or imitators of 18th century poet Alexander Pope! Long live heroic couplets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #24
71. It sounds on the face of it, whenever you are ignorant of its history
(like me), to be completely docile. Phonetically it sounds purely descriptive. So I'm not surprised that different regions both within the catholic church and outside it use it differently. It seems wherever conflicts between "reformationists" and catholics are high the term is used derogatorily as a slur. However, given the term was used by Catholics before Martin Luther, it can't be reduced to a slur in all occasions or regions. Papists=follower of the pope-sounds to me like a description. Is Papal a slur? I just heard on CNN someone say Papal authority? That only means something negative if you aren't catholic and have something against them. Laura Bush calling someone a Papist would be a slur. My father who was raised a catholic and used this term, per my discussion with him this morning, to describe himself before he left the church. So go figure. Was he slurring himself? I don't think so. He didn't know it had negative connotations in other regions because it didn't carry a negative weight in his. I won't be using the term because I could give a dime about it. Its meaning is obviously defined in relation to a particular context and so should probably stay in those contexts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
28. Anti-Catholic bias may have been enough to sink John Kerry
Its real and its still out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. Yes. These last few days have been enlightening.
Raised Catholic, I long ago lost belief in a supreme being. So I'm currently unaffiliated, although I'm interested in myth, legend & comparative religion.

If I were still practicing, I'd be agitating against several Church doctrines. I totally understand opposition to Church beliefs or practices.

But some recent posts have been made by those who sucked in extreme xenophobia with their mother's milk. Modern Know Nothings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jilly Beans Donating Member (334 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #28
46. Yes. In the South, one of the main Anti-JFK assertions was that...
he was Catholic.

Amazing, isn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
30. I confess ignorance on the term as well
I had heard the term "papacy" many times in conjunction with the Pope, but had NEVER realized the bastardized version of same was such an ignorant and disgusting term.

BTW, I am 51 years of age and a (former) Catholic, so I am surprised that I never knew of it.

I am thankful to those on DU who brought the true meaning of this term to light, and I apologize to all (even though, thankfully, I have never used it) for not being aware of its true meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
36. Well, as an English major
the only time I'd ever seen the word "Papist" until today on DU is in pre-19th Century literature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jilly Beans Donating Member (334 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. I'm a history PhD
and I've only seen it in similar context.

And I specialized in Civil Rights in the South for my MA. :shrug:

But I now know that it is an offensive term, and one that I have NEVER used, but I'll be certain to never use it.

I don't like to see ANYONE'S religion ridiculed on DU. I'm going to exercise more sensitivity in all contexts where anyone's religion is being discussed.

(On a side note, the use of Xian has always perturbed me, too.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. Xian, Xmas and so on
...would probably be better received if it were written +tian, +mas and so on. It's probably early typewriters and limited typesetting that fecked up that business...since there was no way to make the cross, signifying Christ, on a typewriter, they went to the closest thing, the x, but the doggone x is what you also use to scratch something out.

Road to hell, good intentions, whatcha gonna do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. Nope, taking offense at Xian or Xmas is a new invention
The "X" comes from the Greek letter Chi which is tied to Christ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jilly Beans Donating Member (334 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. That may be so, but in context on DU, it's almost always used in...
derrogatory fashion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #59
65. I disagree completely. It's used as shorthand
It is not derogatory, although thosw with victim complexes tend to take it that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #65
67. Walt's Right on this one
"Xian" is the SAME as writing "Christian," it's just shorthand. X=Chi=Christ. Exactly like Xmas meaning Christmas. Having people freak out about this is a relatively new occurrence. ie "taking Christ out of Christmas." I actually had someone tell me once it was a Witchcraft plot. Being a Pagan, I took umbrage at this.

I sue Xian alot on DU just as shorthand, like btw for by the way. When I'm being derogatory, I write "Fundie" or "Christian" in quotation marks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #67
69. I've even stopped using Fundie. I now call them the
Religiously Insane as I have met fundamentalist Christians who are not like these wacks. I don't consider the Religiously Insane to be Christians either, so I don't use the "Christian" thing either as it insinuates they at least attempt to eschew some level of the teachings of Jesus when in reality they pretty much do precisely the opposite of what Jesus said in the Gospels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #58
62. I agree with your assertion, and your explanation of the origins
The "bad" X IS indeed a new "American" thing, a nonsensical wedge issue for the uneducated and historically ignorant from the religious right, who equate X with crossing something out. But back in the old days, when paper and ink were scarce, it was a very religious shorthand, because they wrote it with their quills more like a + than an x.

More than we probably need to know on the subject: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10488a.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #62
66. Thank you, the ignorant who suffer from victim complexes
refuse to understand shorthand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
38. I accept your apology.
Its nice to know that we can all learn lessons even in the midst of strife. Heck, that's what makes us Democrats!

Have a good day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
48. It's been said frequently on TV
I never knew that it was a derisive term until here. I had little contact with Catholicism for the most part. I checked a couple of online dictionaries and one said it wasn't an offensive word until the 19th century. I always find it fascinating how word usage can change over the years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
49. I didn't notice it, and I'm Catholic.
Personally, I don't thkink it's even the misuse of the word unknowingly. It's when other Catholics post that the burial ritual is part of the Catholic custom and other posters go on and on about how barbaric and gross they are, that seems to be what is riling people up. I haven't been upset, just surprised that more posters don't receive these messages from Catholics here with an open ear.

Hey, I offend all the time. We all do it unknowingly. It happens. We learn and go on. That's why we're here. That's the joy of being liberal- we aren't full of hate and we understand and respect one another. The religious was should be out there, with people who force you to practice their religion, not those who just enlighten or inform you about their own. There is a huge difference! :hi:

:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. What a reasoned statement
Unintentional offense is nothing more than an opportunity to learn. And you're quite right about liberal attitudes, respect, and forgiveness.

I figured out immediately that the term was not hurled with deliberate invective attached, so I didn't sweat it excessively. But hey, we should all never pass up a chance to learn something new--I try not to!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
54. Já! Acho que ese cara não sabe de onde a bandera Brasileira é.
... más eu, estou morrendo de saudade. Acabo de assistir o "Auto da Compadecida" outra vez... aí, o sertão do Ceará! :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
achtung_circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
55. I've heard it
and mostly in connection with my grandfather. He was a carpenter/builder in the late 19th/early 20th centuries. His jobsites had a sign
"Bog-trotters, Papists & Broncos need not apply"

Bog-trotter= Irish
Papist= Catholic
Bronco= newly arrived Englishman

This grandfather was a hard line Orangeman and in addition to 3 very nice children produced my Uncle XX, he's the one who told me in 2002 that "the US should bomb the fucking sand niggers into rubble. I mean it's not like they invented the wheel or anything."

Hang on XX yes they did.

Evil and hateful and ignorant, both of them, father and son.

I've always known it was a nasty thing to say, but learned better from my father.

BTW my grandfather was troubled when my parents married because (gasp) my mother's family was IRISH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
57. I'm another former history major who learned something today.....
We all have heard "papacy", "papal" and "papabile" frequently in the last week. Taken at face value, the term "Papist" wouldn't sound particularly bigoted to someone uninformed on Cathoilic history. I'm sure that few posters deliberately meant to slur Catholics when they used it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
6000eliot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
61. Well, then
I guess "Whore of Babylon" is right out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
63. Prior to today, I had never heard the term and assumed it was benign
until I looked it up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
64. I must don't get out much, I never heard of it until your thread.
And I'm catholic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #64
68. Unless you "get out" to Klan meetings, you wouldn't hear it in Texas.
It's a word dragged from the archives of ancient bitterness. Relevant for studying the English Civil War (Cromwell, etc.) or the xenophobic Know Nothings of the 19th century, I'd thought it nearly extinct.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #68
72. Actually, you could very well hear it in SE TX
We have a large Catholic population here, due to the French influence on ths region, our proximity to the Cajun regions of Louisiana, and our own Cajun population in Texas. And the only people I've ever heard use the term were Catholics, and though they did use it in a snippy manner, it was not meant as a general insult to Catholicism. They used it to describe a Catholic who was showing more fealty to the Pope than to the Church- which was always somewhat confusing for me as a non-Catholic, since I've always thought that the Pope basically was the Church? But again, I'm not Catholic. I am a backsliding Baptist who is completely removed from organized religion. And though I did hear derogatory things about Catholics from the SBC (and Methodists and Lutherans and...), even they didn't use the term/insult Papist.

So you could very well hear it in various regions, and it not be the insult that most people here believe it to be. Perhaps it is also that the associations of England with Catholicism and the French connections to the Church are so very different. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
74. I have heard the term and always assumed it was a legitimate one.
Edited on Fri Apr-08-05 02:14 PM by Misunderestimator
...and not offensive slang... wow... I'm going to have to rethink my entire vocabulary now. :shrug: I've never used it myself, but can see how I would have... I've certainly read the word many times without understanding its meaning, possibly because the author didn't understand it either? Wow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC