Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Race is Catholicism?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Calico Jack Rackham Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:09 PM
Original message
What Race is Catholicism?
I figured I'd start a thread about this because I was called a bigot, racist etc. because I used the outdated term "Papist"; furthermore others compared it with calling a Black person darkie or nigger. Have things gotten so bad that we can not disagree with a religion without being labeled a racist against an organization not an actual ethnic group?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes they have gotten this bad.
Now kiss my ass you bigot.









<sarcasm off>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. i would just say ignore those people
they are probably the same people who think the word cracker is just as bad as the word nigger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. No it's just we have a few extremists here on DU
regarding THAT religion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Oh you are bad...
;)

And I'm worse 'cause I'm gonna note that some of the most extreme have this nasty tendency to exempt their own digressions from Church doctrine from any scrutiny while preaching the party line on issues that don't affect them personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Say it isn't so!
that would be hypocritical!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Wow...I shocked...
nothingshocksmeanymore. It's a world gone mad. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Because we all know that
the Pope is infallible and Church doctrine must go unchallenged. Unless, of course, it is the characterization of homosexuals as evil. There, and apparenly *only* there, is the Church wrong. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. But the same catholic catechism that has all the other rules
states that if you are gay, you must be chaste and not be sexually active...it's right there in the rule book.

Why should I respect your religion if you can call it wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Because that rule book
only applies to *others* silly! You think I have to live by the same rules I want forced on other people and women? :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. *snort*
"other people AND women"...oh that's too funny :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Yeah, I hoped y'all
would get that part. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I had to laugh...
the alternative is to commit shovel-beatings upon the heads of certain people who are obviously opposed to women just on general principle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I definitely agree....
the evidence of their existence is quite apparent, even on this very thread. People just go "extreme" when Catholicism is mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. I don't think there's anything extreme about having an opinion that is
less than glowing of the Catholic religion, and you can feel free to use the search to see if I have posted anything since the pope passed away...

Telling people they MUST respect your religion is worse than extreme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. i don't get it
how is using the term papist bigoted???

i've heard all sorts of people on the tv/radio using that term...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Calico Jack Rackham Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:18 PM
Original message
I think because traditionally it
was a derogatory term for Catholics. Perhaps I posted improperly and should have clarified that that term should be reserved for thr ultra conservative Catholics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LdyGuique Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is not to confuse popery with potpourri
unless one is discussing popery funeral incense burning :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm with you, since there are Catholics who are NOT Papist
e.g. the ultra-right-wing whackos Mel Gibson likes. They think the Pope is too liberal. (!!!!!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bellamia Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Catholicism is not a race
it's a Religion, but surely you knew that. IMO Papist is a perjorative term, used to demean, find fault with, another person, one not of YOUR "religion". Kinda like "Fundie". We have a long history of intolerance of another's views, beliefs, religions, in this country. I see nothing new in your experience. Sad, we haven't come all that far, have we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. literal translation of the word Catholic is Universal
Edited on Thu Apr-07-05 01:22 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well, ya see.............
Edited on Thu Apr-07-05 01:24 PM by new_beawr
The Irish Immigrants were Catholic and used Roman Catholicism as a source of cultural identity. The Native Born white Americans did not care much for the Irish. Thus, Roman Catholicism was excoriated among most Americans. Even to the point that a fairly large political party, the Know Nothing Party, existed pretty much exclusively as an anti-catholic party. See Gangs of New York.......

When the waves of mostly Catholic Eastern European and Italian immigrants followed, the general racism aimed at what were, nevertheless, white Europeans, had to be expressed somehow, and Catholicism was the most convenient way to do so.

Back in the Day, Papist was used as a Derogatory term for Roman Catholic. Catholic is used in the Apostles Creed to indicate a Universal church, Catholic meaning Universal. Thus, Protestants would be loathe to call followers of the Pope "Catholic" since it would indicate that Roman Catholics are part of the Universal Christian Church.

I gotta say, that except for all the death and destruction that have accompanied these sort of religious differences, I find it all to be pretty much like Dr. Seuss' Sneetches
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. Point of clarification: Not every Irishman/woman is a Roman Catholic
Point was driven home to me forcefully when growing up in Catholic Queens. I was told, and used to know where to find this info, that more Irish Protestants than RC's immigrated during the Famine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aintitfunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well, Papist was always
used in a negative way. As there are many catholics in the world, and on this board, I can understand people being offended by the use of the word. You can certainly disagree with the tenets of a religion, I was raised catholic and disagree with much, therefore I am no longer a practicing catholic. I respect the beliefs of others even when I disagree with them.

I did experience religious bigotry because I was raised in the Bible belt and was the only Catholic in my high school (who owned up). So it does exist. I have a friend and co-worker who is a right-wing Christian preacher and he has some obvious religious bigotry toward Mormons and a couple of other religions.

So, you are not a racist when you denigrate Catholicism as Catholics have members of every race. Your use of the word "Papist", however, to describe followers of the religion could certainly be labeled as bigotry. Perhaps you were unaware that the term Papist was considered to be derogatory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egalitariat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. It's not racism, b/c it has nothing to do with race. It is bigotry
however, as being a bigot is not only about denigrating another race, it's simply the denigration of a whole group of people (no matter what binds them together as a group).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well, the word 'Papist' is a smear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Ha Ha, I get it......n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. *groan*
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. Please, someone, I need a rimshot!
Edited on Thu Apr-07-05 01:32 PM by ArkDem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. Because the word "papist"
has been used by anti Catholics, such as Bob Jones, KKK, etc.

It's their grand conspiracy that Catholics are taking over the US & it will be cotrolled from Rome by the Pope.

When JFK ran, he faced this bigotry; now it is much more subtle, but many Fundies still believe the theory & call Catholics "Papists."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
republicansareevil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
26. It's certainly possible to be bigoted against a religion.
I'm not familiar with the term "papist." If it's an offensive term you used inadvertently, the appropriate response to you would be to educate you about the offensive connotations of the word. If it's an offensive term you used deliberately to denigrate Catholics, shame on you. Racism might be technically incorrect, but it's in the right neighborhood. Bigotry is what it is. If the term is not offensive, I see no problem, but since you talk about "disagreeing with a religion," I suspect its use was not that innocent and that you agree it's not a complimentary term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Calico Jack Rackham Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Oh no, I know what the word means and how it was used
I just think that I should have emphasized I was addressing Conservative catholics who for all intens and purposes have replaced christ with the Pope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
30. It's not racist.
It's just KKK-related bigotry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
33. It's the same as Redskin, Guinea, Darkie, Chink, etc
Or any other slur from the 19th century.

The intent behind it is to imply that Catholics worship the Pope and not God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
34. The word "Papist" is a derogatory slur.
It has no place on this message board.

You are free to disagree with religion, but using derogatly slurs goes beyond "disagreement" into the realm of bigotry.

I am stunned to see so many people here on DU saying that such terms are totally fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC