|
I think there were some people who looked at the background of the specific individuals involved in the organization, the rhetoric coming from some of the group members, the fact that some/many of them were going to be carrying guns, the fact that Border Patrol stated they didn't want or need the group's help, and the fact that some racist organizations were supporting the group and concluded that having these people out on the border was a very bad idea and that things were not going to turn out well. As one DUer (I forget who) said, it didn't take Nostradamus to see this coming. ("This" being the allegations that members of the group were harassing people.
On the other hand, I think some DUers took a more abstract view of the situation: they felt that there was nothing inherently wrong or racist about the group's general premise -- that our borders are poorly controlled. They felt there was nothing inherently wrong or racist about the group's stated intentions -- to patrol the borders and report sightings of illegal crossings. And many probably even felt there was nothing inherently wrong with carrying a gun. And, for many liberals, the innocent-until-proven-guilty concept is an important value to be applied to all areas of life, not just the courtroom.
I think that these have been the two major viewpoints that have been argued back and forth over the past few days. Arguably, both viewpoints are grounded in progressive principles, and they are not actually even mutually exclusive. Right-wingers must be enjoying the conflict this whole issue has caused for us on the left. Ironically, I think both "sides" on the left probably agree on much more than is apparent. I think we can mostly agree that seeing unprotected borders as an important concern is not necessarily racist. I think we can mostly agree that acknowledging the negative effects illegal immigration can have on worker wages is not necessarily racist. I think we can mostly agree that illegal immigrants do pump some money into the economy -- although not all of us see that as a good thing so much as further exploitation of them. Most of all, I think we can agree that Mexicans and other immigrants, legal or illegal, have value as human beings. We can sympathize with the economic conditions that compel many to seek employment here even if they break the law to do so. We can also hold in contempt the companies that exploit illegals and also hurt Americans in the process.
We can differ about the economic impact of illegal immigration and employment. We can differ about the best way or ways to solve the issues of illegal immigration. But in the end, I think most of us agree on much more than we realize.
|