Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rice, Goss, Wolfowitz, Bolton, Gonzalez, Negroponte -- which is worst?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:20 AM
Original message
Rice, Goss, Wolfowitz, Bolton, Gonzalez, Negroponte -- which is worst?
Edited on Wed Apr-06-05 09:22 AM by Zan_of_Texas
THIS THREAD - NOW OPEN for your choices as to which of these appointments is the worst, and why.

I'm not one to flail around wildly with overstatement. But, can anyone think of a half-dozen presidential appointments made around the same time that are a worse bunch?

It occurs to me that Dubya operates like he has been treated -- if you fail, someone bails you out. Time after time after time. All you have to do is be loyal. Incompetence and criminality are either ignored, or cause for promotion.

It also occurs to me that if anyone had any doubt that this administration does not fear the ballot box, this set of six is one more piece of evidence that they're not worried about any elections. These six choices fly in the face of reason, public opinion, world opinion, resumes of the six, and reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. This country could probably survive one or two of these assholes
But all combined plus the other morons in the white house and congress combined. WE ARE FUCKED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Mug shots of the vile six.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's a "murderers row"
of incompetence, thuggery, and venality that rivals any list you might want to make. Uggh! I need some fresh air...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. ooh, it's so hard to choose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. Each one worse than the other. But--
If I had to choose, I'd say the Attorney General. He has the most power to interpret/apply the rule of law for the United States government. The citizens' respect for the law could be very seriously undermined by his real actions and his bully pulpit. Then there goes one of the underlying principles of our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. Couldn't pick one...they are all bad
and really for the same reason

Bad for America. Bad for the world.
All murderers and torturers..whether they be actual, accessories or accomplices...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindoctor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. Porter Goss by a nose length
He might become to the CIA what JEH was to the FBI.

We live in the culture of incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. That's a tough one...
... but I'd have to go with Bolton. Not that he's individually the worst of the bunch, but for what he is and what he can do in the UN. He'll end up being a nasty little bull in what is a very large and somewhat delicate china shop.

The others are alternately sinister, duplicitous, zealous and toadying, but we knew that already and can expect the worst of them, which is sort of a continuation of the prior appointees.

But, Bolton is a real thumb in the eye of the UN, and it shows that Bush (or more likely, Cheney) intends to run roughshod over the Security Council as often as possible. Whether it will be so bad that they'll be forcing the General Assembly to throw out Annan and replace him with John Ashcroft, I don't know--but I expect shit as bad as that to happen.

Truthfully, Bolton makes Jeane Kirkpatrick look like Miss Manners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's an impossible choice. These are not just promotions of loyal
liars, thieves, destroyers, deflectors, destroyers who are NOT Americans...these people represent an atrocious layer to the dis-reality being spewed by this cabal and pnacers. By putting so many people in charge over us, they create just the kind of question you asked...which is better, which is worse...which only benefits the cabal/pnacers = it puts the idea in some heads that they are all not bad.

They are TOOLS OF TAKEOVER and they are hell bent on creating as much chaos as possible by breaking as many rules as possible.

TOOLs have unique and separate purposes. May they all get thrown out, lost, or sold at a garage sale.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I didn't mean to imply any were even close to acceptable.
I guess I was looking for analysis, which some of you supplied, on how these awful appointments would play out.

I think Gonzalez may have the most power to do bad domestically.

But, the reaction of the world to Bolton and Wolfowitz may hasten the tanking of the country economically, as other countries finally throw in the towel and start to punish us economically.

And, it seems clear Bolton is in place to turn the UN into an even weaker entity, with no power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I'm not knocking your question...I just regret the dis-reality that they
have created, in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. It's like picking among the potted meats in a can of Spam
Disgusting.

:9 :eyes: :puke: :hurts: :+ :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. They all are, each in his/her own way(s)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davekriss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. Way back at the start of the first GWB misadministration
Let's start with Elliot Abrams, one you forgot to list, and the conclusions we can draw from the fact that the GWB administration made him the NSC's Director of the Office of Democracy, Human Rights, and International Operations (he has since been "promoted" to another position). The appointment was an "in your face" act of pure arrogance, a slap to the face of the world, and a signal of things to come.

Elliot served the Reagan administration first as Assistant Secretary of State for Humanitarian Affairs and later as Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs. He was, if I recall, convicted (then pardoned) for perjury during the Iran-Contra affair. He directed U.S. policy in Latin America during the time when we illegally attempted (and succeeded in) overthrowing the Sandinistas, funded the death squad military in El Salvador, provided Honduras with support while its infamous Battalion 3-16, a U.S. trained death squad, committed atrocity after atrocity. The El Mozote Massacre occurred under his watch as well as (I think) the assassination of Archbishop Romero (or was that at the end of the Carter administration?). At best, we can judge Elliot as highly ineffective and incompetent; at worst, complicit in the evils of the day. As I often say about Bush himself, the truth surely lies somewhere in between -- but note that there is NOTHING positive on this continuum!

So GWB, in the early days of his administration, appoints Elliot Abrams as Director of the Office of Democracy, Human Rights, and International Operations. This marks the GWB administration as either highly incompetent in not properly vetting a man much of the rest of the world considers a war criminal, or complicit and condoning of the policy, actions, and consequences -- the evil, as any of us could argue -- of U.S. Latin American policy in the eighties and early nineties. The truth lies somewhere in this continuum, but again it shows nothing positive.

Of course, the Reagan thug on the ground was John Negroponte, Ambassador to Honduras from 1981 to 1984. He pulled a Sgt Shultz "I know nothing, I see nothing!" when challenged by human rights group about U.S. complicity with the death squads of General Alvarez and of course of the doings of Battalion 3-16. When Negroponte was appointed ambassador to Iraq I envisioned death squads taking out troublesome insurgents and terrorizing innocent citizens, after all it is his MO. Now that he's appointed internal intelligence czar I truly fear Bush is ready to fully unfold his plan for latinization of America and we might someday soon see mothers marching in candlelight vigils for their "disappeared" sons and daughters.

Wolfowitz is hardly a picnic. Along with Scooter Libby (another one forgotten from your list), he drafted for Dick Cheney Defense Policy Guidance of 1992. It pretty much looked like a harsher "Rebuilding America's Defenses". In fact, the opening paragraphs of the PNAC document include the DPG by reference and praise it as an honorable document. All wars and rumors of war, imperial outreach and cold imposition of American military might to preserve advantage in world markets.

Then theirs Tanker Condalezza. And Gonzalez, the Machiavellian madman who soon no doubt will issue the edict, "off with their heads!" for anyone with any arbitrary difference from the Rovian conception of the Master Race. There's no way to choose from this rogue's gallery! They all emerged from the 15th level of Dante's Inferno, that unique spot just below the anus (truly) of a brooding and sour Satan.

All you Christians out there, pray that God turns these men and women away from their blood lust and greed to a vision of peace where the U.S. leads by the power of its ideas and not by the barrel of a gun. Pray for peace, justice, and compassion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Yeah. I was trying to keep it recent.
Abrams is certainly in the class of the vile, but the six above all just got new jobs.

Going back, why, there's Henry Kissinger, appointed to head up the 9-11 Commission (he backed out, but he was appointed).

Chalabi, to head up Iraq (he apparently wanted too much of a cut on the oil, so the admin forced him out for awhile, until he came to his senses).

Any of the contested federal judge appointments. (Are you just WAITING for the Chief Justice appointment?!?!)

And, the illustrious original cabinet appointments.

Here's just one example. (But, see, there is too much material. I was trying to keep this thread focused on recent appointments. But, I'll digress.)

GALE NORTON. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR.
She apprenticed with James Watt at the Mountain States Legal Foundation. This was founded by Joseph Coors, who became its first chairman, with Watt the first executive director. Coors was also investing in the Heritage Foundation. She received nearly $800,000 from energy industries during her 1996 run for the U.S. Senate in Colorado.

Elected Colorado attorney general in 1991. Declined to sue tobacco companies until the last minute. In 1994, the largest contribution to her re-election campang came from Philip Morris. Declined to defend state affirmative action; spent $700,000 defending CO's decision to drop its women's softball team, in violation of Title IX. But, defended Amendment Two FOUR times, and then took it to the Supreme Court. That amendment would ban anti-discrimination laws that protected gays. Under Norton's direction, CO spent over a million dollars defending the law before it was finally struck down.

In the multi-billion lawsuit Cobell v. Norton, a federal judge declared (I believe in September 2002) Interior Secretary Gale Norton and Indian Affairs boss Neal McCaleb “unfit” to manage millions of dollars in Indian trust accounts and cited them for contempt of court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davekriss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Thought Elliot Abrams...
...and Scooter Libby were still employed by Bush, which is why I mentioned both.

But, yeah, just to mention two unemployed thugs, Bush attempted to appoint Kissinger, and had Poindextor around for a while, but they do not hold positions presently.

I'm with you; keep it current. There's enough infamy with your current list of rogues to keep us all busy watching our backs (and wallets and privacy and liberty and our nation).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
16. How do you pick the ugliest piece of shit? - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-06-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
17. Negroponte overall...but Wolfowitz is most evil at the moment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC