Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is ground zero in New York or Hiroshima? Something don't seem right here

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:49 AM
Original message
Is ground zero in New York or Hiroshima? Something don't seem right here
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBATZR667E.html

Goldman Sachs Suspends Plans to Build Headquarters at Ground Zero

According to data submitted to the United Nations by Hiroshima City in 1976, the death count reached 140,000 (plus or minus 10,000) by the end of December, 1945.

http://mothra.rerf.or.jp/ENG/A-bomb/History/Damages.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Both sites are called Ground Zero.
And the term makes sense in both cases.

The Goldman Sachs article refers to the New York Ground Zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. What that image is missing
is an image of the a-bomb dome BEFORE it hit.

http://www.pcf.city.hiroshima.jp/kids/KPSH_E/question_box/question1.html

Sigh. I do so love Hiroshima...

an off-topic Witch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's the "We are the World" complex,
that can take any tragedy, Ethiopian famine, say - and make it about "us."

For me, "Ground Zero" will always only mean Hiroshima.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eagle_Eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. I thought ground zero was at the Trinity Test Site near
Socorro, New Mexico. After all, it was the first ground zero of the first atomic bomb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. I have always been bothered by the naming of New York as Ground Zero
Hiroshima is where the first nuclear bomb was detonated.
The Pentagon was alway called Ground Zero prior to 9/11.
Using Ground Zero was a political thing that they (the MSM) used to get the ratings.
It was a collision with buildings by airplanes, not an explosion.

I never call the WTC site Ground Zero, refuse to patronize the demons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I never call it that either - it's always the World Trade to me or the WTC
I live in NYC and I hate that term. Will not use it ever. The subway stop is still World Trade Center, BTW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. Ground zero is the site of any detonation.
If you blew up a pipe bomb, the police would call the immediate area "ground zero."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrlandoGator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yes, "Ground Zero" is the term for the epicenter of any explosion.
In fact, the use of the term "Ground Zero" for the World Trade Center collapse is actually quite incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melissinha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Ashamed
I am ashamed that the company I work for consults for Goldman Sachs....Bechtel etc... time for a new job....

Yeah, the MSM and their choice of words. I learned in college that you really can tint your speech to advocate without really appearing to do so. One term I don't like is the use of the word "insurgents" by the media and politicians... the insurgents in Iraq should be referred to as guerrillas... not insurgents...

Insurgent: rising in opposition to civil or political authority or against an established government.

guerrilla: A member of an irregular, usually indigenous military operating in small bands in occupied territory to harass and undermine the enemy, as by surprise raids.

We are the Occupying force, the Iraqi "enemy combatants" are an "indigenous military or paramilitary unit operating in small bands in occupied territory to harass and undermine the enemy"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC