Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Bob Woodward a right-wing shill?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Goathead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:27 PM
Original message
Is Bob Woodward a right-wing shill?
During a press conference today held by Judge Laurence Silberman and former Senator Chuck Robb, co-chairs of the commission investigating U.S. intelligence on Iraq, Silberman referred to the "Woodward book". Silbermen has been described as "a fierce ideologue who doesn't let his judicial responsibilities get in the way of his Republican activism." I can only assume Silberman was referring to Plan of Attack. Another gentleman, with whom I've been having an on-going discussion about the current state of affairs, also advised me to read the "Woodward book", not once but about five times in one hour. This man is a self described neo-conservative and a republican, though he claims he has no love for Bush. Does the book try to let Bush off the hook? I have not read the book and I have heard people refer to Woodward as a mouthpiece for the right among other conspiratorial comments. It sounds as if at the very least Woodward is a Bush apologist. I'm going to try to find Plan of Attack at the library.(Gotta stop buying so many books! Plus I'm sure republicans think that libraries are communist institutions, which is all the better.) Anybody got any insight on Plan of Attack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
canichelouis Donating Member (357 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hell yeah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adwon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think so
His book Veil wasn't terribly kind to the Reagan administration.

Woodward, by his own admission, doesn't really write history. His books are ok to start a potential area of research, but not definitive at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's the book in which Woodward asked Bush did he consult with his
father about going to war with Saddam and he said "I answer to a higher Father". Woodward was pretty stunned by that and made no bones about it. I thought the book was a pretty clear indictment of Bush and all his cronies. Yet it didn't seem to faze them as much as it should have.

I've heard it rumored that Woodward is a longtime CIA operative. but he has never been shy about being critical of this admin. Who knows. Deep deep psy-ops?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lenidog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. I must have gotten old
I have actually lived long enough to see someone ask if Bob Woodward is a right wing shill. Nixon would probably disagree in that assessment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Even then - 30+ yrs ago - Woodward was a Republican
/just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. And based upon that you think he's a "right wing shill"?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Actually, I didn't indicate WHAT I think~
Edited on Thu Mar-31-05 02:20 PM by comsymp
Was simply responding to the post above which seemed to imply that his Watergate work (again, over 30 years ago) negated the possibility - which is, of course, ridiculous.

ON EDIT: FWIW, I don't believe he's a RW shill. I do, however, believe that he's a whore and Bush apologist. That doesn't mean that he gives the BA the Gannon / Schmidt / Faux treatment - I'd be more inclined to put him in the Isikoff column.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. *LOL* alrighty then. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindoctor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. LMAO nt
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have believed for a long time that Woodward shills for the BFEE. I think
it is no coincidence that Woodward, who was with Naval Intelligence, was placed at the Post and within 4 months a Deep Throat emerged. I have long held that Deep Throat is Poppy Bush, who needed to manipulate Nixon out of the presidency for the real fascist bosses.

Throughout Bush1's presidency, Woodward could never find a story of anything he did wrong. Woodward also declared on LKL that Enron was a nonstory.

It was no coincidence that Woodward and that propagandist from the Moonie Tiimes, Bill Sammon, were the only two shill journalists allowed to "report" on BushInc immediately following 9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lenidog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Damn excellent agent
How many intel agents have won two Pullitzers during their undercover careers. The man has got to be the most excellent undercover agent in history. He takes his cover seriously
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. That Pulitzer Prize winner stated there was "No story" in Enron.
That Pulitzer Prize winner couldn't find anything worth reporting in IranContra or BCCI?

Two of the biggest crimes against the Constitution of any administration and Woodward had nothing much to say.

Do you contend that Bush, the most secretive president in history, chose Woodward to report on 9-11 because he knew Woodward would be tough on him? HAHAHAHAHAHA.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I'm convinced that he is since reading about him on a 3/30 Octafish thread
which exposes "Operation Mockingbird".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. do you have a link? sounds fascinating... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. General Discussion :Do you know your BFEE? dead men tell no tales
Edited on Thu Mar-31-05 03:01 PM by oasis
Octafish is the author. I'll kick it to the first page.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suziedemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. What's BFEE? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Bush Family Evil Empire n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goathead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. He would be the perfect deep cover operative
Destroy one republican to prop another one up. Besides, it has been well established that "The Agency" knows no loyalties to any particular party. Employees and agents are loyal only to "The Agency"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. You're close.
Agents are loyal to the corporate fronts for which they work within the agency. The CIA is a collection of businesses, centered around oil and defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Question -
I've been meaning to ask this for some time about the acronym BFEE. What is that? Bush Family Evil Empire?

Your theory about Woodward and Deep Throat is food for thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i miss america Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. My sentiments exactly, BLM
Edited on Thu Mar-31-05 02:43 PM by i miss america
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. More accurately, a shill for military-intelligence.
Read Jim Houghton's book on Watergate, Secret Agenda. Woodward was a mouthpiece for the CIA's cover story, and shielded the agency from accountability.

Some within the CIA were more than happy to bring down Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Hopefully they haven't all been purged yet. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC