Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush: U.S. had 'darn good intelligence' on Iraq -- Tuesday, July 15, 2003

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:26 PM
Original message
Bush: U.S. had 'darn good intelligence' on Iraq -- Tuesday, July 15, 2003
'When I gave the speech, the line was relevant'

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/07/14/white.house.intel/

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush said Monday he had "darn good intelligence" on Iraq despite his disputed State of the Union claim that Baghdad sought to purchase uranium from Africa.

"The larger point is and the fundamental question is, 'Did Saddam Hussein have a weapons program?' And the answer is, 'Absolutely,' " Bush told reporters after a meeting with U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan.

Friday, Central Intelligence Agency Director George Tenet accepted responsibility for allowing the line to stay in the January 28 State of the Union address, but many Democrats say the White House still has explaining to do. (Full story)

The White House has tried to put the issue behind it, arguing that the allegation was just a small part of the U.S. justification for war.

"This revisionist notion that somehow this is now the core of why we went to war, a central issue of why we went to war, a fundamental underpinning of the president's decisions, is a bunch of bull," White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said Monday.

Many Democrats are accusing the White House of misleading the American people in the State of the Union address. But Bush said, "When I gave the speech, the line was relevant."


Oh how the mighty have FALLEN? Oh wait, no, that was all just LIES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. When neocons use either the word "darn" or "folks"
they're trying to sound down-home while trying to accomplish something extremely ruthless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formerrepuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Saddam bad, September 11th, Saddam bad, September 11th..Saddam bad..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Seymour Hersh, 3/29/05 --"We know jack"
Edited on Thu Mar-31-05 12:39 PM by Gloria
This and many more quotes from Hersh in my article on him that's being formatted for posting at Buzzflash at this very moment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. nope. no weapons, not even a 'program'
all intelligence looks 'darn good' to someone who cant think for themselves.

he is not qualified to be dog catcher, no seriously, i dont think he could pass a civil service exam. so why is he president?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. i think we do or we did but they used what they wanted
they cherry picked the questionable intel. I read that the germans warned higher ups in the Bush administration that the iraqi exile "Curveball" was not to be believed but they went ahead and used his bullshit at the UN in Powell's speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC