Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

To those who feel the law should not decide the Schiavo case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:54 PM
Original message
To those who feel the law should not decide the Schiavo case
because you don't like the rulings, what system do you suggest we Americans use to resolve such disputes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. hooket on fonecks...(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
31. that's some funny shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Dear Joe, I confess that our judicial system could be improved.
I would like to somehow destroy the influence of money and politics on that branch of our government. Moreover, I would like to punish all those who abuse that branch of government.

However, without that branch of government,...the one that at least has the responsibility of ensuring that a "rule of law" holds together this nation of ours,...no matter how imperfectly,...this nation and the experiment of "democracy" for which it stands,...would FAIL and FALL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Floogeldy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
33. I beg your pardon?
Please provide evidence that money and politics influence our judiciary. Moreover, identify the judges that are abusing that branch of government, and specify the punishment you think they should receive.

Thank you very much for your answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. How 'bout a Crusade to crush the infidels?
:P

Or a trial to determine what witch put a spell on Terri? Then we could burn them at the stake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Maybe we could just poll everyone in the United States
every time there's a dispute among family members.

What difference does the law make anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. The law doesn't matter anymore, nor the Constitution
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Right - because courts aren't perfect, no laws need apply.
I keep seeing it on DU - but no one seems to be able to suggest an alternative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. If you don't like the law, change the law
and the law, or the laws in this case, shall be changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Which law should be changed and on what legal grounds?
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. You don't need a "legal ground" to change a law
all you need is the votes in the legislature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Fine. Which law or laws specifically do you suggest changing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. That's a state issue
so it will be up to like-minded citizens in each state to review and change the laws in their respective states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Which law do YOU suggest be changed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. I can only speak for my own state
and we will see what happens next year when the legislature meets again. It is too late for anything this year. Our legislature has been too busy on more mundane matters.

I am sure that there will be some Meetups about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I'm talking about the Schiavo case. If you're unhappy with the laws
that determined this outcome, which laws do you think should be changed?

Can you name even one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I don't live in Florida
Sorry to burst your balloon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. That doesn't stop you from complaining about the law. So what
do you suggest be changed specifically?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. This is what your thread is all about..
To those who feel the law should not decide the Schiavo case because you don't like the rulings, what system do you suggest we Americans use to resolve such disputes?

My reply was to change the law. Or do you find that concept disturbing? Surely you don't advocate that people take the law into their own hands! Or do you assume that everyone that disagrees with Judge Greer's ruling on the Schiavo, or other domestic dispute cases, is an advocate of vigilante justice?

I will remind you of what you have posted about respecting the law the day you find a law that you don't like. And I will also remind you that if you don't like a particular law, that you should get together with other like minded citizens and try to change it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. So WHICH law do you think should be changed?
Edited on Thu Mar-31-05 12:56 AM by mondo joe
You've got opinions about the Schiavo case - which law do you think was the problem?

I don't know why that's such a challenge for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. I won't take your bait
It appears that the intend of your original post was nothing more than flame baiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Got it. You can complain about the law in general but can't cite
any one law in this case you think should be changed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I am not familiar with the Florida Code
plus I am not a Florida resident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. I see. You know enough to complain about it, but not enough to
even suggest what might be changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. I don't understand the prosecutorial tone...
My feelings are hoit...

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. S'okay. There are a lot of people who complain up a storm but
never have any idea how to fix the things they complain about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. Well I am SHOCKED to see no solutions presented!
After all the complaints that the courts aren't perfect I'd expect to see SOME idea about what could have been done differently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lauri16 Donating Member (509 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. Does the law not say
that a spouse is the next of kin? This never should have been an issue in the courts at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Anything can be challenged. And even an unsuccessful challenge
can tie up a case for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
32. Yes. The "legal issue", if any, really, was guardianship.
The parents thought they should call the shots instead of Michael.
Spouses and children are the most immediate family and make these decisions; if the person is not married the parents (if living) decide. The Schindlers didn't like the way Michael handled things and they wanted to take over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
13. It has been in the courts for years.
The law did decide it already. It is just that the right wing does not like what the law said, so they are calling it judicial failure.
It is scary stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. There are DUers who feel justice was not done - I would like to
know what they suggest as an alternative to the legal system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lauri16 Donating Member (509 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Stop the attention seekers from filing lawsuits.
Edited on Thu Mar-31-05 12:44 AM by Lauri16
That's all this whole thing was about. If it weren't, they wouldn't be upsetting the lives of the other patients and families. The fact that they're out there with bullhorns tells me that it's all about the attention and nothing more.


or should it be court orders? I don't think lawsuit is the right word.

*edited to add question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal43110 Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-05 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
22. Create a new federal law:
Ban death at the federal level. Everyone should be hooked up to respirators, feeding tubes, pacemakers, and dialysis machines indefinitely. Truly a culture of life, no?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC