Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton rescued Elian with federal troops. Why didn't * do this for Terri?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:33 AM
Original message
Clinton rescued Elian with federal troops. Why didn't * do this for Terri?
Do you think fundies are gnashing teeth and pulling hair out by fistfuls over this comparison? :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hey, don't give them any stupid ideas
Okay?;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. Truth is, Clinton sometimes ignored the poll numbers...
... as in the case of Elian (at least the poll numbers among the Batista apologists in Florida's Cuban-American community).

Bush sure as hell isn't ignoring them now. Karl Röve miscalculated, both in the short and long term, on using the empty husk of Terri Schiavo as a political tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. immigration in clearly a federal question. feeding tubes are clearly not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah, but I doubt many knuckledraggers can discriminate the difference.
Most are functioning on a mental level below Terri's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femme.democratique Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. The two cases are not similar
In the Elian case the stormtroopers descended because the family was in direct violation of a court order. This case is exactly the opposite, if Bu$sh did this he would himself be violating the will of courts. The cases are totally different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I don't want him to do it. I'm just wondering about the mindsets, or lack
thereof, among fundies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. There was a court order authorizing the return of Elian
Edited on Sun Mar-27-05 09:40 AM by bowens43
to his father. The courts did authorize anyone to 'rescue' Terri.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Elian's situation was decided by law. I don't recall that anyone
came to get him....well, I sort of do vaguely. But it wasn't a "rescue," really. The govt reps just went to get him, in accordance with a court order that decided the Elian situation.

What Jethro did was send some govt agencies to "rescue" Terri FROM a court order. In defiance of the law.

The first situation - legal. The second - illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Difference is that Clinton was rescueing someone from the Crazies
and if Bush sent in the Feds he'd be taking someone who is being protected from the Crazies? :shrug:

Umm, because Federal law allowed Clinton to do it and Federal and State Law prohibits Bush from doing it? :shrug:

Personally, I kinda am hoping and daring the Bush Bros to do it and show the world their true colors and maybe America would finally wake up, if they haven't already this week....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. Polls. If polls showed Bush's position to be popular he not only would
have sent in federal law enforcement to seize Schiavo, he also probably would have declared "Mission Accomplished" afterwards, especially if they let him wear a costume again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. exactly! it would not be politically expedient, is the only reason
--they (either Bush bozo) could care less about Terri Schiavo, or about the law. since "sending in the troops" would cost them dearly politically, they're not gonna do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. There are countless posts at FR about this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. What are they saying? I get ill when I go over there, plus its hard
to maneuver through the posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think femme is right. Clinton was enforcing a court order. Jeb would be
violating it. Someone would have pointed this out to the fundies and it is easily grasped that it wouldn't be a useful point of reason. Essentially it's irrelevant to their cause, which is better served, as I imagine they intuit, by appeals to emotion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
14. Good point--Big Bill has balls and Gutless George has none...
Edited on Sun Mar-27-05 09:46 AM by MrBenchley
(Of course, Bill also had the law on his side...but the law means nothing to those who are going to fret about the two cases in comparison to one another.....)

A great meme to spread among the pig-ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yep, if legal distinctions meant anything to the wackos they'd
be home respecting judicial rulings over the last decade which supported Michael Schiavo's decision to remove the feeding tube. Instead, they are committing civil disobedience, threatening and scaring both those in the hospice and surrounding community. These people have ZERO respect for the rule of law unless it agrees with their beliefs. They think * should follow suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Exactly...
There's a great post up this AM from Tena at First Draft...

"There are 70 patients in the hospice. Everyone one of those people has come to that hospice to die. Their families are there to share their last moments with their loved ones. And instead of this what they have are a bunch of religious loons screeching and using bullhorns and going into hysterics and getting arrested. And getting their children arrested.
Is this contemporary American Christianity? This is like a demon horde from hell. They are without any feelings for other human beings without any morals, and without any thought. They are without humanity.
I don't remember my NT that well, but isn't Holy Saturday the day when Christ went down to hell? These creatures outside of the hospice slavering over the death of what remains of Terri Schiavo have managed to drag hell right up to earth. "

http://first-draft.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. sure is
i am absolutely stunned at the stupidity of the question as if there were some sort of equivalence in the two cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. But those dumb enough to ask the question
can't be happy with the implications of the "answer"....unless they prefer a cowardly eunuch in the Oval Office (snicker)...

By the way, let's not forget to point out that Gutless George is a war time deserter who won't appear before audiencesunless they sign loyalty oaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. the difference is the RW leaders really want Terri to be a martyr
That way, they can scream "Remember Terri Schiavo" to rally their "base" next year, while the mainstream will have forgotten about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
20. Very simple. The law was on the side of Juan Miguel Gonzalez
It is also on the side of Michael Schiavo.

When the authorities took Elian, they were enforcing the law.

Were Jeb to send state troopers down to take Terri, he would be violating the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
21. I do think the fundies ARE making that comparison. They're WRONG,
but that never stops them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. And if deluded cognitive dissonance results in mass brain explosions
so be it! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC