Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I just read through Mrs. Schiavo's GAL report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 08:50 PM
Original message
I just read through Mrs. Schiavo's GAL report
and have posted a summary here:

http://www.thoughtcrimes.org/mt/archives/001986.html

It is quite obvious that very few people on the Right have actually read even the first page of this report, never mind all 38 pages.

David Allen
www.blackboxvoting.com
www.thoughtcrimes.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. mind if I media blast your summary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Be my guest
Certainly a LOT of reporters need to read it.

David Allen
www.blackboxvoting.com
www.thoughtcrimes.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's an excellent summary. Thank You
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Now schrubbushitler and chimp brother trying to take custody of her!
unfuckingbelievable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. If this whole wacked out fiasco had anything to do with facts,...
,...it would not be a wacked out fiasco.

What a damned shame,...this whole country should be ashamed of what it has become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. The Abuse allegations were dismissed "with prejudice"
Thanks, David! Great summary.

The abuse assertions now being put forth in front of the cameras are more of this dog and pony show.

13) A Guardian Ad Litem (GAL) was appointed to investigate claims of abuse by the Schindlers. His March 1, 1994 report found no abuse and that Michael Schiavo had been very attentive to his wife. After two years of legal procedures, the action was dismissed with prejudice.

http://www.lectlaw.com/def/d061.htm
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - When a case is dismissed for good reason and the plaintiff is barred from bringing an action on the same claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. That report is required reading for anyone who wants to know
the facts of the case that seems to be blowing the U.S. government apart right now. Good for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. It should be required reading
before any politician or reporter is allowed to open his mouth on the issue.

David Allen
www.blackboxvoting.com
www.thoughtcrimes.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. anhd what's worse, neither have the MSM
I had to correct three different people today about the facts, because they are only hearing the lies by the MSM.

It is beyond the pale what's happening here. It is unbelievable to me that the government will lie to the public ON TV in order to interject themselves into the private lives of common citizens. Every citizen in this country should be outraged -- and fearful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharonking21 Donating Member (552 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Help a poor newbie?
Okay, I give up! Everyone here and elsewhere keeps mentioning the MSM. But I don't have my decoder ring yet. Help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. MSM = Mainstream Media
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Welcome to DU!
Mainstream media, as David was so kind to point out. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savannahana Donating Member (491 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. newbie to newbie, welcome :-)
some of the acronyms had me stumped at first, too...

there's a page over at dailykos
http://www.dkosopedia.com/index.php/Common_Political_Acronyms_and_Abbreviations
that served me pretty well months ago as a basic decoder (grin), but DUers have gotten so inventive (& funny) I've been thinking it'd be a great idea to have such a page here - DUopedia??

there's a thread going in this (GD) forum (if I can just find it again ... anybody??) proposing clearer alternative shorthand for MSM -

Corporate Media (CM) or Corporate-Owned-News (CON)

with some good thinking supporting these substitutions, IMO!

anyhow,, glad to see you here (l o t s of newly registered folks here, just in the past few days!)

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Hi savannahana!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savannahana Donating Member (491 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. thanks, newyawker99 :-)
my mate's a NY native, too, so here's an extra wave from him :hi:

& :toast: for your great welcomes to Us Who Wander In here,
much appreciated!

ana
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks - that is a good summary of the facts.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. I did this because if you Google
on "Schiavo" you get a ton of hits on news stories and wacko sites. Only in the last 24 hours has one site which tries to be objective made it into the list.

I wanted to create a link to a report which answers a LOT of questions about the issue in a very compassionate manner.

David Allen
www.blackboxvoting.com
www.thoughtcrimes.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Here's another
that anyone who's interested in the truth should read http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/infopage.html#timeline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yes, that was the site I was talking about
It has links to the various court rulings on the matter.

David Allen
www.thoughtcrimes.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharonking21 Donating Member (552 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. Appreciation
Thank you for the excellent summary. I have been meaning to read the entire report, but just kept on blogging instead. Now you make me want to stop and actually the THE WHOLE THING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. It should be required reading
before anyone is allowed to open their mouth on the issue. <s>

David Allen
www.blackboxvoting.com
www.thoughtcrimes.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. I got tired of digging for information
and when I found the report, I decided to summarize it for everyone else.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
19. I saw this man on television last night...
He seemed to be a very thoughtful and fair person. He said that the Schindlers were a decent and loving family. Probably the most reasoned and non-judgmental voice that will ever be heard on this matter. And that Michael was not a warm and fuzzy sort of guy, but that fact did not make him a bad person.

He spent many hours by her bedside. He repeatedly went over court documents and physicians' reports. He has absolutely nothing to gain in any of this. He was there to see that her interests were best served.

In the end, he kept coming back to the same conclusion. It's not about the family, it's not about government intervention. It's not about those of us who have formed such strong opinions one way or the other. "It's all about Terri".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savannahana Donating Member (491 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
20. many thanks for the summary
glad to find your blog, too :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
22. Great summary, David!
:thumbsup:

...and nominated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
25. When did the right ever let facts get in the way of good slander...
lies and hysteria?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
26. Maybe I missed this, but why was Terri Schaivo under the care
of an obstetrician?
Was she pregnant at the time of her heart attack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. That was something that had me confused too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Many women use their gyn's as primary care physicians
since that's the doctor they visit most often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. They were trying to get pregnant...
Terri went from 250 to 150 to 110. The medical malpractice settlement was based on excessive and rapid weight loss and excessive hydration, that the dr. should have suspected she was bulimic and or anorectic. That is how Karen Carpenter died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. Olbermann interviewed him on Countdown last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
32. Your summary should be required reading. Excellent.
I could only dream of having the degree of care that Terri had ... and it'd be a nightmare to have her parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC