Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First Rule: When your opponent is making a mistake, don't interrupt.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 10:50 AM
Original message
First Rule: When your opponent is making a mistake, don't interrupt.
The dems played it perfectly. Sometimes the best way to win is to give your opponent exactly what they want. I am talking about the Schiavo thing. There is too much knee-jerk "those traitors, they should filibuster everything" criticism, most of it based on simplistic analysis and ignorance of tactics and strategies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Never jump in front of a perfectly good train wreck.
Anyone with political sense knows this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
achtung_circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Also known as
when they are digging their own hole, don't offer to hold the shovel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. there are a few here
on DU who understand how the game is played.

The only smart way to have navigated the Palm Sunday situation was how it was played--make it as difficult as possible without actually obstructing.

Thre was no reason to draw attention away from the naked power grab that isn't playing too well in Peoria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. The key was not allowing it to actually be passed on Palm Sunday
Edited on Tue Mar-22-05 10:57 AM by Walt Starr
That was too important to the propaganda technique being used. Denying passage on Palm Sunday was a key maneuver in this thing psychologically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. Very true
Forcing them past midnight in the house was important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Yeah, we would have heard endlessly about the "Palm Sunday Life Bill"
It would have been enough to make anyone puke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I'm really hoping
that she doesn't die on good friday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. It would be more likely she would die on Easter
But the most likely time will be next Monday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. I'm hoping for either Thursday
even though I know it's early...or Monday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MemphisTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good point, this goes for any issue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good call.
The Schiavo case is an excellent preview of the reproductive rights battle that's coming down the pike, and the American people don't like it one little bit. Schiavo is the kind of issue that resonates with the media and the AJ (average Joe)--it's about life, death and emotion, not just columns of numbers on a chart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. I have to agree.
With 70% of the electorate saying this is a decision for the husband and 80% saying Congressional Republicans are acting strictly for political ends it has got to hurt them in '06.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. That Appears to be Correct
I was afraid that the GOP had another stupid winning emotional issue. But the polls say a majority disagrees with the president.

Looks like the "don't they have more important things to do", "let her die in peace" and "it's a family and state matter" memes are winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. Tell that to the Congressional Dems who climbed on board ...
... the Panderwhore Express. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. well no need for the filibuster then.
Or opposition to anything, war included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Those are different issue.
Poster is talking only about Schaivo. How do you think the Democrats should have reacted differently on this matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. If the strategy was to let the repubs expose themselves, abstain.
Don't join in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. Amen brother! You said it.
Give them enough rope!

I'm all for Democratic Backbone, but this is playing out beautifully for our side.

They look extreme and hypocritical. The are violating the tennats of thier party which is conservatism, states rights, etc.

The Dems are doing exactly what they should. Seem above it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrainRants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. Now that they're drowning, it's time to throw them an anchor...
No Surrender! Kick the bastards while they're down...and go after the Bug Man for his ethics violations, and get Frist's medical license revoked for "practicing" medicine through a video.

Then again, they've already tied anchors around their own necks, time to watch them squirm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
12. We've pretty much mastered the "don't interrupt" strategy.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
16. My daddy always said "Give 'em enough rope,
and sooner than later they will hang themselves." My daddy was a smart man :)

It's taken me a while to learn that though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. My dad was smart too.
Some of my favorites:

Don't hate a man just because of what he is. Get to know him. Find a good excuse.

Hey, seen two, you've seen 'em all!

Just because you got a fist full of cash don't mean they really like you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
17. Ignorance
Edited on Tue Mar-22-05 11:53 AM by bigtree

I don't see it as so fucking intelligent to let the majority walk all over you like a good deal of these Democrats seem content to do. I, for one, elected my Senators and Representative to actively oppose this administration, not constantly angle for their political viability. When will this body of Democrats actually stand together against this destructive pack of republican corporatist shills?

Even more ridiculous is this notion that sitting on their hands or, as half in the House did, actually voting in agreement with the conservative majority, was some sort of strategic victory, especially in the light of polls which show that the public would have actually agreed with their opposition to the Schiavo bill. Further, the majority of those polled saw the affirmative vote as a political ploy. Here we had the majority of Americans with us on an issue that we should have been unified on, but instead of standing up and opposing the constitutional meddlers many opted instead for a duck-and-cover response which left many, like me, to wonder where the opposition was. Nesting?

The sheepish response of these timid Dem legislators seems to me to be an inviting the perception of a party which stands for nothing but the preservation of its political future. This is the same calculated meandering that gave us the ANWAR legislation, the Bankruptcy bill, and a continued occupation of Iraq. I'm sickened by the political maneuvering of the bulk of this crop of elected Democrats which has resulted in devastating defeat after defeat and augers for more of the same in the years to come.

Folks who think this is some smart strategy are just rationalizing away the abandonment of those who elected these legislators to actively oppose Bush and his minions. I don't see a grand strategy being exercised by our elected Democrats, I just see fear and craven self-preservation at the expense of the needs and concerns of their core constituents. It's hard for me to see any victory, Pyhrric or otherwise, coming out of this 'avoidance' ploy (if in fact that was what it was). I just see the morphing of our party into a weak confederation that can be counted on to effectively roll over at the slightest hint of political danger, at the expense of basic tenets of Democratic values and Democratic principles.

That's not "knee jerk", "simplistic", ignorant, or any of the other insults you want to dish out for those of us who expect more from those we give our faith, sacrifice, money, and votes to at election time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
18. Maybe- but the cross over Dems
acted as atrociously as ever- and THAT cannot in ANY WAY be said to be a welcome development.

More of the same, sell out AND hurt the party in the process crap, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
19. I'm not sure if the Democrats are that smart
Although the Republicans certainly are that grasping, and overreach is inevitable. That being said, I also understand the time constraints and physical logistics involved. The Democrats, many of whom were out of the town at the time the Republicans decided to make this an issue, didn't have time to caucus or form a coherent counterstrategy. Their initial response was all over the place, as every Representative and Senator either followed his or her conscience or bravely stuck a finger in the wind to try to define the prevailing course.

But now that it's pretty apparent the Republicans overreached their greedy, ham-fisted grasp, it's time to lower the boom on them. Get a strategy going, come out with a unified message that upholds Democratic party principles (follow the laws as written, respect the wishes of the family, honor the marriage of Michael and Terri and allow Michael to speak for his brain-dead wife who can no longer speak for herself), and call the Republicans on their political grandstanding.

Bring out that odious memo that spurred the Republicans into thinking this was a political opportunity to exploit, rather than the incredible private tragedy it is. Draw parallels between this and other Republican intrusiveness, and insist that they quit meddling in private affairs and get back to running the country, which they aren't doing a very good job of right now.

Characterize them as attention deficit-addled adults, distracted by whatever shiny issue crosses their path, while they let our budget get wildly out of whack, our trade deficit grows, the job pool shrinks, and rapacious corporations enslave our citizenry.

Go get 'em, Democrats! They've gone way out on a limb, and now is no time to be squeamish with the chainsaw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. Somebody else described this as their
Caligula moment (appointing the horse prime minister or
something like that because he could). I think that's
a pretty spot-on diagnosis.

For them to behave this way is inevitable given their
stranglehold on power in Washington and their arrogance.
It would be sweet if this issue began their unravelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. with the astonishing propaganda out there about poor starving Terri
and her apparently greedy and abusive husband, I worry that polls will turn in Delay's favor. I hope I'm just paranoid.

On the other hand, there isn't a family in America who hasn't faced the choice. We all know from experience it is a choice you don't make lightly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Living will reps report a sharp increase since the case in applications
reportedly up to 2000 a day. That would seem to indicate that the main concern of the public is against government meddling, not some soap opera, fundie propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Every American Will Face Death
and every American, while wanting to cling to every thread of life, wants to die in dignity. What is happening to Michael Schiavo's wife, Terri Schiavo, is horrific to a vast swath of people in this country.

Many people do look at life and question whether they would prefer to exist in a near vegetative state or be dead. I personally cannot think of a greater hell than being unable to fully communicate my desires, to fully express myself and not even being able to savor and enjoy the food that is being put into my system.

Mrs. Terri Schiavo can't enjoy a movie, television programs, a good book... She can't go to a lake and swim. She'll never be a mother, and never enjoy neices and nephews. What kind of hell are the Schindlers damnign Mrs. Terri Schiavo to? Why are they putting their own selfish desire before Terri's quality of life?

I believe most Americans can see this clearly. They have either gone through end of life issues with relatives and realize just how difficult a decision it is and realize that forcing someone to remain alive like this is usually a selfish decision made by the living with no respect for the patient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
25. Never murder a man who is committing suicide.
"Never murder a man who is committing suicide." Woodrow Wilson on Charles Evans Hughes, 1916.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldcoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
27. What makes sure think that the Democrats wouldn't be blamed
for this bill along with the Republicans? There are many individuals who view the two parties as identical, and the fact that so many Democrats actually voted for this bill gives them ammunition.

For the record, I do not expect the Democrats to fight every bill. However, I do expect members of both of parties to fulfill their duty to uphold the Constitution by voting against clearly unconstitutional bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC