|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
OneBlueSky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-18-05 01:43 AM Original message |
shouldn't Democrats introduce a bill mandating that oil from ANWR . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-18-05 01:48 AM Response to Original message |
1. EXCELLENT IDEA. I have heard that most of that oil would go to Japan, as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-18-05 01:52 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I've read that too. Wronk kind of crude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tokenlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-18-05 01:51 AM Response to Original message |
2. This should be done for certain.. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-18-05 01:53 AM Response to Original message |
4. I think it should go exclusively to those indigenous natives Akaka lauded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illflem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-18-05 02:01 AM Response to Original message |
5. The reason Alaskan oil goes to Japan is more logistics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-18-05 02:36 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. It does make a difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyRingo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-18-05 02:48 AM Response to Original message |
7. Watch the oil cos. lose interest in ANWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alittlelark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-18-05 03:03 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Find one that is REALLY interested. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dutchdoctor (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-18-05 03:38 AM Response to Original message |
9. That would be a bad idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-19-05 03:36 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. the actual policy may be a bad idea . . . introducing the bill is not . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-18-05 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
10. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC