Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RAWSTORY: Secret Service responds on Gannon inquiry, says ‘no deviation’..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 01:54 PM
Original message
RAWSTORY: Secret Service responds on Gannon inquiry, says ‘no deviation’..
<<SNIP>>
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/index.php?p=161

Secret Service responds on Gannon inquiry, says ‘no deviation’ from ‘proper procedures’

Secret Service says Gannon approved appropriately

By John Byrne | RAW STORY Editor

The Secret Service has responded to a request from House Democrats to investigate the approval of discredited White House correspondent ‘Jeff Gannon’ and says there was “no deviation” from “proper procedures,” RAW STORY can reveal.

The Service, which responded in a letter to Rep. John Conyers and Rep. Louise Slaughter on Monday, asserts that Gannon was approved appropriately.

“Please be advised that our Office of Protective Operations has looked into this matter and has determined that there was no deviation from Secret Service standards and procedures as your letter suggests,” wrote Secret Service Deputy Assistant Director Conrad A. Everett. “Mr. Guckert provided the Secret Service with his legal name, rather than his ‘pen name,’ and was assessed using the same criteria applied to all individuals seeking access to White House briefings.

....

Rep. Slaughter, in a statement to be included with the Secret Service letter shortly, thanked the Service for their response but said it only raised more questions.



<</SNIP>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let's see:
A gay prostitute who cared enough about hiding his activity to assume a pseudonym gets approved to enter the inner circle in the White House? Isn't that why these folks keep screaming about gays in government? That they are a BLACKMAIL RISK?

Nah, I don't buy it.

Hey Gannon! Who's ya Daddy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. right. they knew exactly who and what he was and so did the wh.
so why dont they stop lying about it and admit they were rigging the news conferences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Now that's what I'd call a truly lame cover-up attempt. From the quotes...
....of Conyers and Slaughter, they clearly see it as lame.

No lid big enough to cover this one.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Lame, indeed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Actually that is good news.
It means Gannon(sic) did not deceive them. So the blame must be with the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC