Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Global Flyer is successful. Now what, and why?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 03:35 PM
Original message
Global Flyer is successful. Now what, and why?
Most of the classic, big aviation "firsts" have now been completed. Crossing the English channel. Crossing the Atlantic. Reaching the poles. Circling the globe. Non-stop for all those things. Solo for those things. Unrefueled for those things.

So what's the next thing for the adventurous humans out there? Did SpaceshipOne open the door to civilian space based firsts? More man-powered records? Solar powered records?

If you could pick some "first" type feat to accomplish, what would it be, and why?

(Note: I'm thinking aviation firsts, but you could include things like ocean exploration, mountain climbing, etc...)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's mine
flying around the earth really really fast... backwards and turning back time so that that darn earthquake doesn't happen.

I'm more into the X Prize type of firsts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Bring an Fe based Asteriod into a La Grange point to be melted down
and used for assembling a Construct in Space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Could make a lot of people nervous.
Racing to move around iron (Fe, yes?) asteroids could involve serious hazards for people on Earth. I'd imagine there'd need to be some serious regulations to make sure no one drops a big rock on New York.

That said, I like the idea. Would foster research in a lot of areas. Space scanning techniques to locate asteroids requiring less energy to get into the La Grange. A space tug of sorts to get out to the rock and bring it back. It also presumes a facility in the La Grange to do the work.

Would be cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Scardy cat --LOL-- L4 & L5 are like 1/6th of an AU from Earth
An AU is what like 98 million miles ? --so that would be

radius X Pi ? = about 300 million miles---1/6th of that is about 50 million miles

Either that or crash the thing into the moon real slow--and use it on the moon--if you wanted to use Iron to build on the moon. Since the moon is iron poor, that might work out nice.
Then there are the impurities--Platinum and some other unimportant stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Heheh, fair enough.
It is too early to be paranoid.

However, while La Granges are a ways out, how far do you need to go to find an Fe asteroid? When bringing in something from much further out, isn't 1/6th AU relatively small change?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. There near Earth "roids" that normally pass close by- 'tween EArth
and Mars--say. Otherwise just past Mars there is a belt--full of them.
L4 and L5 are 60 degrees in front and in back of EArth--but in EArths orbit.
IIRC L1-L2 and L3 are much closer-L2 would be 'tween the Earth and moon--but much closer to the moon. IIRC L1 is sun side of Earth while L3 is out past the moon. ALL follow the Earths orbit, and are static in that regard--IIRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. At current tech, past Mars is too far.
Perhaps some of the Earth/Mars rocks, though.

Haven't people wondered of other junk might naturally collect in the L points? I assume they've been looked over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. X-Prize is a great example.
By setting a goal to be achieved, it gave people something concrete to shoot for. Without the X-Prize offer, how much longer might it have taken for a civilian program to have gotten into space?

So, if you had 10 million dollars to set aside as a prize, what goal would you set?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Here's the new X Prize
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/aviation/article/0,20967,1027551,00.html

The public has seen this vision for decades—another hopeless dreamer’s space fantasy. But here there’s a difference: Bigelow is betting $500 million of his personal fortune that he can make it come true. He has hired veteran space-travel engineers to perfect the technology, he has produced nearly launch-ready hardware for testing, and he’s floating a $50-million prize to entice other companies to create a safe, reliable orbital space vehicle to transport guests to the front door—or rather, the airlock. Even five years ago, this plot would have seemed utterly implausible. But with Burt Rutan’s recent Ansari X Prize triumph—his company, Scaled Composites, won a $10-million competition for the successful, repeated launch of a manned suborbital space vehicle—and the subsequent creation of Virgin Galactic to capitalize on Rutan’s technology for tourist spaceflights, Bigelow’s project provides an intriguing new twist in the development of a commercial spaceflight industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Yeah--something the size of a Shuttle fuel tank---sounds easy--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I'm from Jersey? Are you from Jersey?
I grew up in West Orange
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. W.O.-get on valley st. and go south to S.O.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. To be fair, I'll start:
What: Solo, man-carrying, New York to Paris purely solar powered.

Why: In the shadow of the end of oil, I want to give the world reason to believe we can accomplish great things via alternative energy.

Part of the reason Lindberg attempted his flight was to demonstrate the viability of aircraft for transportation. It was quite a while before passagers were able to follow in his trans-Atlantic footsteps.

I think the same will be true of alternative energy. The first use of it will likely be impractical for general use, but it will point the way for future improvements.

And no, I haven't started doing anything remotely like this. I just think it would be a great idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Billy Ruffian Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. Solar powered aircraft
NASA had a solar powered project. IIRC, it was lost, but the technology was working pretty well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Solo walk around the world.
With floating shoes, of course, for the watery part of the journey.

Or for half the distance, a solo walk from pole to pole. Using the floating shoes only from Antarctica to the tip of South America that could be a mostly land-based stroll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Human piloted dive to the Marianna's Trench
Seven miles deep.

(bring crash helmet and pool toys)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Billy Ruffian Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. It's been done
The Trieste bathyscape, IIRC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. Fossett made this 22,000+ mile flight on about 270 gals fuel.
In order to qualify as around-the-world by the international aviation record sanctioning body, the Fédération Aéronautique Internationale (FAI), the flight must be at least the length of the Tropic of Cancer (about 22,800 statute miles). That works out to about 85-mpg for a jet-powered (single Williams FJ44-3 ATW "Cruise Missile" fan-jet) airplane flying at a planned speed of near 300 mph.

Now what, and why?, you asked.

Designed by Burt Rutan's California-based Scaled Composites (which recently won the $10-million "X Prize" for sending a privately-designed three-person craft into space twice in two weeks), the GlobalFlyer is a derivative of earlier Rutan designs. Future Rutan iterations and derivatives will only enhance these amazing performance figures. That is the way Burt works. Solo round-the-world powered flight was never Rutan's ultimate goal. It is a step in a process of man/machine optimization.

Low drag profiles allow smaller engines to be used. Smaller engines burn less fuel with less pollution. Higher wing-sweep (an Ed Swearingen design-driver) also allows smaller engines and greater economy. There are many different ways to approach the problem of maximizing aircraft efficiency while minimizing environmental impact. Rutan, IMO, is running one of the best labs in the world in studying these problems, developing innovative solutions, and testing their theories with spectacular results.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Back in the 1920's and 1930's it was Jack Northrop, and his flying wings
Zimmerman and his flying Flapjack, and the german Horton Brothers who also designed Flying wings--but who did not solve the problem of how air spilled over the wing--creating turbulance, Northrop had hired Herb (SP?) Haskanhas who developed the "LAminar flow wing", which was 1st utilized on the P-51 Mustang--which is one of the reasons why the Mustang was clocked at Mach 1.1 in a wind tunnel in 1947.
Herb was in charge of the control surface team for the Northrop flying wing project during WW2.

Mr. Rutan stands on the shoulders of some good people that went before him, and continues to uphold the highest standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Clarence "Kelly" Johnson also comes to mind (Lockheed "Skunk-works").
"Kelly" designed the P-38 Lightning, the F-80 (America's first production jet), the F-104 "Starfighter", the U-2 of "Cold-War fame, and the SR-71/YF-12 "Blackbird," among others.


P-38


F-104A


U-2


YF-12s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Hmm yeah-but the P-38 suffered from near unfixable compressability
The lightning and the Mustang had compressability problems--but the lightning HAD to have a wing fix.
The P-38 was also transonic, most likely.
And the Laminar flow wing is still the standard today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Billy Ruffian Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. IIRC, the P-38 was one of the hot planes in the Pacific
I've seen a picture of hundreds of P-38s pushed into a pile at the end of the war. When you consider how few are left flying, it's enough to make you cry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Proposing an aircraft milage goal?
100mpg, corrected for winds? Interesting idea, as aircraft have been fuel wasters, up till now.

I'm looking for goals that can be set, then accomplished. Man/machine optimization is an interesting concept, but its a direction, not a finish line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-05 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Rutan is a national treasure
It's amazing to see what he has done in a small shop with very little money (compared to a Boeing or Lockheed)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC