Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Meet the 3 teenagers that Bush put to death

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
scoopmeister Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 09:43 PM
Original message
Meet the 3 teenagers that Bush put to death
http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/attytood/archives/001520.html

Three young men who were convicted of committing murders when they were just 17 were killed by lethal injection during Bush's tenure as governor, which ran from 1995 through the end of 2000. Two of the three execution victims each had suffered severe head injuries as children -- one the result of alleged extreme child abuse -- and were judged by experts to be mentally impaired or retarded. The third was sentenced to die by a jury because -- according to his defense lawyer -- "he was a black man who killed a white woman, and he was very very gay."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can imagine Bush's* response.
"Boohoo dint kill me boo hoo." A true man of God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. There will be a lot more where they came from
Edited on Tue Mar-01-05 10:01 PM by DenverDem
when busholini inc. finishes dismantling all the social services programs that his rich "base" no longer wants to be bothered with. These kids should have been taken care of by a compassionate community long before they got in capital trouble.

"Then shall He answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me." Matthew 25:45
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Defintion of an adult?
A 12 yr. old?

The Silverspoon Sociopath and his sidekick Gonzales love their jobs of killing human beings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. I remember recoiling in disgust when Bush made fun of Karla Fay Tucker
that is when I knew he was an evil sadist.

... to mock her like that it was revolting...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. My Sentiments Exactly, BleedingHeart
Edited on Tue Mar-01-05 10:39 PM by thecai
I knew he was evil, before he did that, but when I saw what a heartless, unforgiving, hateful hypocrite he was, MOCKING her, while she faced execution, I was appalled and sickened.
And ever since then, I have not found any redeeming qualities in the guy. He refused DNA testing to death-row inmates, and he signed more death-warrants than any Governor. He pardoned the least amount of inmates, (who incidently were all "in bed" with the busholini's).
A wise ruler scatters the wicked, but I see this present "leader" GATHER the wicked, and scatter the upright.
To mock the poor is to reproach his Maker.
IMPEACH Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius 2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. I sincerely doubt that Bush bothered to look at the files at all. He
doesn't read,doesn't think, and truly doesn't care. He simply rubber stamped whatever torture man Gonzales put in front of his ignorant little- man face.

He has no conscience, therefore no remorse and anyhow, as we all know, our Lord and Saviour, George W Bush never ever makes mistakes.

If there is a God in heaven, George W is doomed to a horrible, private hell..much deserved.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bush is a sociopath.
Edited on Tue Mar-01-05 10:22 PM by liberalmuse
Anyone who could put 151 people to death in a few years without a thought is soulless. Even Hitler pulled down the shades when his train passed by his concentration camps. Can you picture Bush doing that? I picture him laughing and joking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. in my dreams, * stands before a jury and judge, awaiting sentencing ...
life or death ...and the answer is .....YIPPEE SKIPPEE!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillowTree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Since when...
....does a governor personally execute someone?

At least in this context, Bush put no one to death. He was a governor who respected the legal verdicts and sentences of judges and juries who actually heard the cases according to the laws of the State of Texas in effect at the time.

I know how tempting it is to blame this guy for all the ills of the world during his entire lifetime, but this is completely bogus. If you want to blame someone for these executions, blame the judges and the citizens who sat on the juries. Or, worst case scenario, blame the legislators who put the laws on the books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. The Gov Signs The Death Warrants
And the gov has the power to pardon inmates. He was governor of Texas during a very corrupt era within the judicial and penal departments. And in spite of numerous wrongful convictions and coerced confessions, Gov. Bush STILL refused to grant DNA testing for death-row inmates who claimed innocence.
Bush also lied when confronted with the Abu Ghraib inmate abuse, stating "it's not the American way!" and "we didn't know anything about it". He has ignored reports of inmate abuse in America for YEARS, and he HAD to be aware that Texas is one of the worse states in the US for inmate abuse/murder/neglect. Visit links on webpage:
http://hometown.aol.com/sonrisepark/myhomepage/politics.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maveric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. Were they all black? Didnt he also commute a death sentence for
Henry Lee Lucas, a white serial killer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I Believe So
Edited on Tue Mar-01-05 11:05 PM by thecai
According to most reports, they were all or mostly black (and hispanic?), and only "friends" of bushco were pardoned. (On edit: only ONE?)
Bush has since acquired many "tokens" to appear to be non-racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. I thought this post was going to be about the young teen
soldiers and civilian children who have died in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
14. FOX News Clearly Disappointed Youths Can't Be Executed
http://www.newshounds.us/2005/03/01/fox_news_clearly_disappointed_youths_cant_be_executed.php

News Hounds
We watch FOX so you don't have to.

March 01, 2005 FOX News Clearly Disappointed Youths Can't Be Executed
You know a story is important to FOX News when an article about it on their website is written by someone at FOX rather than just being a reprint from AP. So the fact that there is a story by FOX Reporter Jane Roh (whom readers might remember was the one who "mistakenly" reported that Communists for Kerry were really pro-Kerry) indicates that the Supreme Court ruling against the death penalty for underage criminals is especially significant.

The article begins, "The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ended the option of the death penalty for 16- and 17- year-olds, stating that persons of that age cannot 'be classified among the worst offenders.'" The use of the word "option" makes it seem as though the Supreme Court has taken away some kind of freedom of choice, or the right to kill, rather than pointing out that the court is reinforcing the rights and protections of minors. In case you think I'm making too much of that, look at this sentence: "The court's decision marks the third major restriction on the death penalty in 17 years, and may be seen by advocates as moving the United States closer to a full abolition of capital punishment."

If the law won't let you kill kids, what rights will it take away next? You can almost hear FOX News honchos churning out memos warning their employees to be on guard. If so, reporter Roh must be making her bosses proud for having written, "Robert Blecker, a professor of criminal law at New York Law School, worried that death-penalty opponents would use (the) decision to further chip away at fair punishments (my emphasis) for the worst offenders. Blecker predicted that opponents would next go after life imprisonment without parole for juveniles, would lobby to raise the age of eiligibility to 20 or 21 and would argue against the death penalty for the mentally ill."

The bastards! Don't those bleeding-heart liberals know that being pro-life only applies to fetuses and the brain-dead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC