Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guckert Presswatch Day 7: The MSM are still all pussies.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 09:56 PM
Original message
Guckert Presswatch Day 7: The MSM are still all pussies.
I wanna see a shitload more than 514 Guckert stories on Google News, all filed by John Doe's News Page and other assorted blogs and the foreign press and overtly liberal websites. I've been looking at this page for DAYS, and the growth in the number of Guckert stories is slow as HELL.

http://news.google.ca/news?hl=en&ned=ca&q=guckert&ie=UTF-8&scoring=d

And, mainstream media, I don't want to hear that this story has no legs because bush broke your kneecaps.

Do your damn jobs! Pussies!!!

(The couple of exceptions who prove the rule know who they are.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. me too
Grow balls MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. They are afraid to touch this story
The real question is why. It's not as if it isn't a huge story. If this was the Clinton White House we would have seven independent investigations already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fresnobill314 Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Would you please use Mainstream Media instead of MSM.
In my circle, MSM means "men having sex with men." It took me a week to figure out that it was being used for "mainstream media."

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. MSM is less key strokes though.
MHSWM is what you're talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Don Knotts says Hi, cat girl!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. LOL!
:hi: Oh, I am so sorry I told you that.:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. LOL You shouldn't have said that you were sorry.
Edited on Wed Feb-23-05 12:27 AM by tuvor
I'll now be the bane of your existence. That is, if I have your permission.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. When I'm hanging around your circle, I'll be sure to remember that.
Edited on Tue Feb-22-05 10:21 PM by tuvor
In the meantime, MSM means something quite different in this one. :)

Oh, and welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. sorry, but MSM is now in wide use
you should stick with M4M
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. TIME magazine
has a tiny little box called Blogwatch with a picture of Guckert/Gannon. It's their out. If/when this story explodes -- when Jeff's benefactor becomes known -- TIME can say they didn't ignore it. But, their tiny little feature is more a curiousity than a serious treatment of the White House's association with prostitution. And their story on Cooper and Miller and reporters being able to protect their sources completely bypasses Novak's culpability. Why does this guy continue to get kid glove treatment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bush_is_wacko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Truthfully, if the MSM isn't following the HUGE Gannon/Guckert thread here
Edited on Tue Feb-22-05 10:31 PM by bush_is_wacko
on DU, they damn well should be! The connections that have been made are astounding! MSM NEEDS to get on this thing NOW! Gannon/Guckert is probably in grave danger. The only thing that can save him IMO is EXPOSURE! Find the original post from Andy with the title "a new wrinkle in the Gannon/Guckert story and read through it. It is astounding!

On Edit: the thread is a new wrinkle in the Gannongate story! I has now accumulated over 700 posts in three seperate threads! Even if a third of it is true it is astounding!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. Gannongate: It's worse than you think -Salon.com -2/23/05
Gannongate: It's worse than you think
Bush's press office gave Jim Guckert access, even knowing his only credentials were from the blatantly partisan group GOPUSA.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Eric Boehlert

Feb. 23, 2005  |  When the press first raised questions about why Jim Guckert had been awarded access to the White House press room for two years running while he worked for Talon News, critics charged that Talon, with its amateurish standards and close working ties to Republican activists, did not qualify as a legitimate news organization. It turns out the truth is even stranger: Guckert was waved into the White House while working for an even more blatantly partisan organization, GOPUSA.

White House press secretary Scott McClellan originally told reporters that Guckert was properly allowed into press briefings because he worked for an outlet that "published regularly." But that's when the questions were about Talon. More recently McClellan offered up a new rationale. Asked by Editor and Publisher magazine how the decision was made to allow a GOPUSA correspondent in, McClellan said, "The staff assistant went to verify that the news organization existed." (Emphasis added.)

That, apparently, was the lone criterion the press office used when Guckert (aka Jeff Gannon) approached it in February 2003 seeking a pass for White House briefings. Not yet working for Republican-friendly Talon News, which came into existence in April 2003, Guckert, using an alias and with no journalism experience whatsoever, was writing on a voluntary basis for a Web site dedicated to promoting Republican issues. To determine whether Guckert would gain entrance to the press room, normally reserved for professional journalists working for legitimate, recognized and independent news organizations, the press office simply logged on to the Internet and confirmed that GOPUSA "existed," and then quickly approved Guckert's access. In a White House obsessed, at least publicly, with security and where journalists cannot even move between the White House and the nearby Old Executive Building without a personal escort, Guckert's lenient treatment was likely unprecedented.

Yet, if there's one other person who did manage to receive the same type of kid-glove treatment from the White House press office, it was Guckert's boss at GOPUSA and later at Talon News, Bobby Eberle. A Texas-based Republican activist and a delegate to the Republican National Convention in 2000, Eberle founded Talon News after he became concerned that the name GOPUSA might appear to have a "built-in bias." With no journalism background, he too was able to secure a White House press pass, in early 2003, on the strength of representing GOPUSA, dedicated to "spreading the conservative message throughout America."

-----

To obtain a day pass during the Clinton administration, a reporter "had to make the case as to why that day was unique and why had to cover the White House from inside the gates instead of outside," Lockhart says.

So the mystery remains: How did Guckert, with absolutely no journalism background and working for a phony news organization, manage to adopt the day-pass system as his own while sidestepping a thorough background check that might have detected his sordid past? That's the central question the White House refuses to address. And like its initial explanation that Guckert received his press pass the same way other journalists do, the notion first put out by White House officials that they knew little or nothing about GOPUSA/Talon News, its correspondent Guckert or its founder Eberle has also melted away. Instead, we now know, former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer personally spoke with Eberle about GOPUSA, so concerned was Fleischer that it was not an independent organization. (Eberle convinced Fleischer that it was.) Additionally, Guckert attended the invitation-only White House press Christmas parties in 2003 and 2004, and last holiday season, in a personal posting on GOPUSA, Eberle thanked Karl Rove for his "assistance, guidance, and friendship."


Con't-

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/02/23/more_gannon/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
13. Who is stopping Hillary, Kerry, Dean & Obama from talking about it on TV?
And why are we expecting the media to run 1000 stories on how corrupt & uncredible it is????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC